• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年同伴地位的高低与社会评价的关注呈纵向相关。

High and low levels of adolescent peer status are associated longitudinally with socioevaluative concern.

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

J Res Adolesc. 2024 Mar;34(1):114-126. doi: 10.1111/jora.12904. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1111/jora.12904
PMID:38012779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10922244/
Abstract

This study examined linear and curvilinear longitudinal associations between peer status (i.e., likeability and popularity) and socioevaluative concern, a socio-cognitive feature characterized by attunement to judgment from peers. A sample of 716 adolescents (M  = 16.01, SD = 1.25; 54% female; 46.5% White; 69.5% reduced-price lunch) was assessed twice annually. Likeability and popularity were assessed with peer nominations at Time 1. Measures of general (rejection sensitivity, peer importance) and online (digital status seeking, online status importance) socioevaluative concern were obtained at Times 1 and 2. High and low levels of likeability were longitudinally associated with increased peer importance, while high and low levels of popularity were associated with increased digital status seeking, and decreased online status importance for girls.

摘要

本研究考察了同伴地位(即受欢迎程度)与社会评价关注之间的线性和曲线性纵向关联,社会评价关注是一种社会认知特征,其特点是对来自同伴的判断做出协调。研究样本包括 716 名青少年(M=16.01,SD=1.25;54%为女性;46.5%为白人;69.5%享受减免餐),每年评估两次。在第 1 次时通过同伴提名评估受欢迎程度和受欢迎程度。在第 1 次和第 2 次时获得一般(拒绝敏感性、同伴重要性)和在线(数字状态寻求、在线状态重要性)社会评价关注的测量。高和低水平的受欢迎程度与同伴重要性的增加呈纵向相关,而高和低水平的受欢迎程度与女孩的数字状态寻求增加以及在线状态重要性降低有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10922244/f60884e087ad/nihms-1943549-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10922244/6de6bf4e6800/nihms-1943549-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10922244/c738c7413f6b/nihms-1943549-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10922244/f60884e087ad/nihms-1943549-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10922244/6de6bf4e6800/nihms-1943549-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10922244/c738c7413f6b/nihms-1943549-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10922244/f60884e087ad/nihms-1943549-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
High and low levels of adolescent peer status are associated longitudinally with socioevaluative concern.青少年同伴地位的高低与社会评价的关注呈纵向相关。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Mar;34(1):114-126. doi: 10.1111/jora.12904. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
School engagement trajectories in adolescence: The role of peer likeability and popularity.青少年时期的学校参与轨迹:同伴可爱度和受欢迎程度的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Oct;64:61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 11.
3
Dispositional and Social Correlates of Digital Status Seeking Among Adolescents.青少年数字状态寻求的性格和社会相关性。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024 Mar;27(3):187-193. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2023.0342. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
It's Lonely at the Top: Adolescent Students' Peer-perceived Popularity and Self-perceived Social Contentment.高处不胜寒:青少年学生的同伴感知受欢迎程度和自我感知的社交满意度。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Feb;48(2):341-358. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0970-y. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
5
Behavioral Engagement, Peer Status, and Teacher-Student Relationships in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study on Reciprocal Influences.青少年期的行为参与、同伴地位与师生关系:一项关于相互影响的纵向研究
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jun;45(6):1192-207. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: a social relations analysis.同伴地位与课堂座位安排:一项社会关系分析。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
7
Do Adolescents Adopt the Prosocial Behaviors of the Classmates They Like? A Social Network Analysis on Prosocial Contagion.青少年会效仿他们喜欢的同学的亲社会行为吗?一项关于亲社会行为传播的社会网络分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan;54(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02037-z. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
8
A healthy peer status: Peer preference, not popularity, predicts lower systemic inflammation in adolescence.健康的同伴地位:同伴偏好而非受欢迎程度预测青少年的系统性炎症较低。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Nov;109:104402. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104402. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
Individual Popularity, Peer Group Popularity Composition and Adolescents' Alcohol Consumption.个体受欢迎程度、同伴群体受欢迎程度构成与青少年饮酒行为
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Aug;46(8):1716-1726. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0611-2. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
10
Social Costs for Wannabes: Moderating Effects of Popularity and Gender on the Links between Popularity Goals and Negative Peer Experiences.追求人气的代价:受欢迎程度和性别对追求人气目标与负面同伴经历之间关联的调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1894-1906. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0810-0. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
How popularity goal and popularity status are related to observed and peer-nominated aggressive and prosocial behaviors in elementary school students.小学生的受欢迎度目标和受欢迎度状况如何与观察到的以及同伴提名的攻击性行为和亲社会行为相关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Mar;227:105590. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105590. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
2
Measuring peer influence susceptibility to alcohol use: Convergent and predictive validity of a new analogue assessment.测量同伴对饮酒影响的易感性:一种新型模拟评估的收敛效度和预测效度
Int J Behav Dev. 2022 May;46(3):190-199. doi: 10.1177/0165025420965729. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
Adolescent Digital Stress: Frequencies, Correlates, and Longitudinal Association With Depressive Symptoms.
青少年数字压力:频率、相关性及其与抑郁症状的纵向关联。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Feb;70(2):336-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
4
The Silver Lining in the Dark Cloud of Social Status Insecurity: The Mediating Role of Popularity Goals in the Association Between Social Status Insecurity and Chinese Adolescents' Bullying Bystander Behaviors.社会地位不安全感的乌云中的一线希望:受欢迎目标在社会地位不安全感与中国青少年欺凌旁观者行为之间的中介作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15851-NP15873. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023489. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
5
Prospective Associations between Popularity, Victimization, and Aggression in Early Adolescence.青少年早期的受欢迎程度、受害和攻击行为的前瞻性关联。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Nov;49(11):2347-2357. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01248-4. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
The longitudinal association between social status insecurity and relational aggression: Moderation effects of social cognition about relational aggression.社会地位不安全感与关系攻击之间的纵向关联:社会认知对关系攻击的调节作用。
Aggress Behav. 2020 Jan;46(1):84-96. doi: 10.1002/ab.21872. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Conceptualizing Digital Stress in Adolescents and Young Adults: Toward the Development of an Empirically Based Model.概念化青少年和年轻人的数字压力:迈向基于实证的模型的发展。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;23(1):15-26. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00300-5.
8
Why does decreased likeability not deter adolescent bullying perpetrators?为什么减少好感度并没有阻止青少年欺凌者?
Aggress Behav. 2019 May;45(3):348-359. doi: 10.1002/ab.21824. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
It's Lonely at the Top: Adolescent Students' Peer-perceived Popularity and Self-perceived Social Contentment.高处不胜寒:青少年学生的同伴感知受欢迎程度和自我感知的社交满意度。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Feb;48(2):341-358. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0970-y. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
10
Forms and Functions of Aggression in Early Childhood.幼儿期攻击行为的形式和功能。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Sep-Oct;48(5):790-798. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1485104. Epub 2018 Jul 27.