• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么减少好感度并没有阻止青少年欺凌者?

Why does decreased likeability not deter adolescent bullying perpetrators?

机构信息

Research Centre Adolescent Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2019 May;45(3):348-359. doi: 10.1002/ab.21824. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1002/ab.21824
PMID:30706945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6590429/
Abstract

This study examines why the lower likeability of bullying perpetrators does not deter them from engaging in bullying behavior, by testing three hypotheses: (a) bullying perpetrators are unaware that they are disliked, (b) they value popularity more than they value likeability, (c) they think that they have nothing to lose in terms of likeability, as they believe that their targets and other classmates would dislike them anyway, regardless of their behavior. The first two hypotheses were examined in Study 1 (1,035 Dutch adolescents, M  = 14.15) and the third hypothesis was examined in Study 2 (601 Dutch adolescents, M  = 12.92). Results from regression analyses showed that those higher in bullying were not more likely to overestimate their likeability. However, they were more likely than others to find being popular more important than being liked. Moreover, those higher in bullying were more likely to endorse the belief that the victimized student or the other classmates would have disliked a bullying protagonist (in vignettes of hypothetical bullying incidents) before any bullying started. These findings suggest that adolescent bullying perpetrators may not be deterred by the costs of bullying in terms of likeability, possibly because they do not value likeability that much (Hypothesis 2), and because they believe they hardly have any likeability to lose (Hypothesis 3).

摘要

本研究通过检验三个假设来考察为何欺凌者较低的受欢迎程度并不能阻止他们实施欺凌行为

(a)欺凌者没有意识到自己不受欢迎,(b)他们更重视受欢迎程度而非受喜爱程度,(c)他们认为自己在受欢迎程度方面没有什么可失去的,因为他们认为无论自己的行为如何,目标和其他同学反正都会讨厌他们。假设(a)和(b)在研究 1(1035 名荷兰青少年,M = 14.15)中进行了检验,假设(c)在研究 2(601 名荷兰青少年,M = 12.92)中进行了检验。回归分析的结果表明,那些欺凌程度较高的青少年不太可能高估自己的受欢迎程度。然而,与其他人相比,他们更有可能认为受欢迎比受喜爱更重要。此外,那些欺凌程度较高的青少年更有可能认同这样一种信念,即在任何欺凌行为开始之前,被欺凌的学生或其他同学就已经讨厌欺凌者了(在假设的欺凌事件的情景中)。这些发现表明,青少年欺凌者可能不会因为欺凌行为在受欢迎程度方面的代价而退缩,这可能是因为他们不太重视受欢迎程度(假设 2),并且因为他们认为自己几乎没有什么受欢迎程度可失去(假设 3)。

相似文献

1
Why does decreased likeability not deter adolescent bullying perpetrators?为什么减少好感度并没有阻止青少年欺凌者?
Aggress Behav. 2019 May;45(3):348-359. doi: 10.1002/ab.21824. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
2
Heterogeneity of adolescent bullying perpetrators: Subtypes based on victimization and peer status.青少年欺凌者的异质性:基于受害和同伴地位的亚类型。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Sep;34(3):1018-1034. doi: 10.1111/jora.12986. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria.青少年时期欺凌行为中的参与者角色:地位特征、社会行为及分配标准。
Aggress Behav. 2016 May-Jun;42(3):239-53. doi: 10.1002/ab.21614. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
4
A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents' bullying and likeability over time.一种关于青少年欺凌行为与受欢迎程度随时间相互作用的社会网络研究方法。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Sep;43(9):1409-20. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0129-4. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
5
Peer and self-reported victimization: Do non-victimized students give victimization nominations to classmates who are self-reported victims?同伴报告与自我报告的受侵害情况:未受侵害的学生是否会将受侵害提名指向那些自我报告为受害者的同学?
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Aug;53(4):309-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
6
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
7
Adolescents' perception of bullying: who is the victim? Who is the bully? What can be done to stop bullying?青少年对欺凌行为的认知:谁是受害者?谁是霸凌者?如何才能制止欺凌行为?
Adolescence. 2007 Winter;42(168):749-61.
8
Participant Roles in Bullying Among Dutch Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorders.自闭症谱系障碍荷兰青少年欺凌行为中的参与者角色。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Nov-Dec;47(6):874-887. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1138411. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
9
The effect of victims' responses to overt bullying on same-sex peer bystander reactions.受害者对公然欺凌行为的反应对同性同龄旁观者反应的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Oct;53(5):375-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
10
Bullying and victimization in early adolescence: relations to social information processing patterns.青少年早期的欺凌和受害:与社会信息处理模式的关系。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):482-92. doi: 10.1002/ab.21494. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Bullying practices by students aged 13 to 17 years according to the National Survey of School Health (2019).根据2019年全国学校健康调查,13至17岁学生的欺凌行为。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 10;28:e250003. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720250003. eCollection 2025.
2
Longitudinal Associations of (Un)popularity with Weight Perceptions and Dieting in Adolescence.青少年时期受欢迎程度与体重认知及节食行为的纵向关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar;54(3):704-719. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02090-8. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Giving It a Shot with a Different Approach: Prosocial Strategies Moderate the Joint Effects of Agentic and Communal Goals on Bullying.尝试一种不同的方法:亲社会策略调节了进取型目标和社群型目标对欺凌行为的联合影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(7):583. doi: 10.3390/bs14070583.
4
Social anxiety moderates the association between adolescent irritability and bully perpetration.社交焦虑调节青少年易怒情绪与欺凌行为之间的关联。
Dev Psychopathol. 2025 May;37(2):656-663. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424000439. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
High and low levels of adolescent peer status are associated longitudinally with socioevaluative concern.青少年同伴地位的高低与社会评价的关注呈纵向相关。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Mar;34(1):114-126. doi: 10.1111/jora.12904. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Psycho-Social Correlates of Cyberbullying among Polish Adolescents.网络欺凌在波兰青少年中的心理社会相关性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 14;20(8):5521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085521.
7
A Multidimensional Investigation of Sensory Processing in Autism: Parent- and Self-Report Questionnaires, Psychophysical Thresholds, and Event-Related Potentials in the Auditory and Somatosensory Modalities.自闭症感觉加工的多维研究:父母及自我报告问卷、听觉和躯体感觉模态中的心理物理阈值及事件相关电位
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 10;16:811547. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.811547. eCollection 2022.
8
Is aggression associated with biased perceptions of one's acceptance and rejection in adolescence?在青春期,攻击性是否与对自己被接受和拒绝的偏见感知有关?
Dev Psychol. 2022 May;58(5):963-976. doi: 10.1037/dev0001333. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
9
Longitudinal Associations Between Primary and Secondary Psychopathic Traits, Delinquency, and Current Dating Status in Adolescence.青少年原发性和继发性精神病态特征、违法行为与当前约会状况的纵向关联。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Jan-Mar;20(1):14747049211068670. doi: 10.1177/14747049211068670.
10
Bullying Prevention in Adolescence: Solutions and New Challenges from the Past Decade.青少年欺凌预防:过去十年的解决方案和新挑战。
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Dec;31(4):1023-1046. doi: 10.1111/jora.12688.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in the early stages of social information processing for adolescents involved in bullying.参与欺凌行为的青少年在社会信息处理早期阶段的差异。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Nov;43(6):578-587. doi: 10.1002/ab.21716. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
The Meaningful Roles Intervention: An Evolutionary Approach to Reducing Bullying and Increasing Prosocial Behavior.有意义角色干预:减少欺凌和增加亲社会行为的一种进化方法。
J Res Adolesc. 2016 Dec;26(4):622-637. doi: 10.1111/jora.12243. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
3
Predicting aggression in adolescence: The interrelation between (a lack of) empathy and social goals.预测青少年的攻击性:(缺乏)同理心与社会目标之间的相互关系。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Apr;43(2):204-214. doi: 10.1002/ab.21675. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Developmental Relations Between ADHD Symptoms and Reactive Versus Proactive Aggression Across Childhood and Adolescence.ADHD 症状与反应性和主动性攻击行为在儿童期和青春期的发展关系。
J Atten Disord. 2020 Oct;24(12):1701-1710. doi: 10.1177/1087054716666323. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
5
Positively biased self-perceptions of peer acceptance and subtypes of aggression in children.儿童对同伴接纳的积极偏差自我认知与攻击行为亚型
Aggress Behav. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):82-96. doi: 10.1002/ab.21611. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
Behavioral Correlates of Prioritizing Popularity in Adolescence.青少年时期将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的行为关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Dec;45(12):2444-2454. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0352-7. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria.青少年时期欺凌行为中的参与者角色:地位特征、社会行为及分配标准。
Aggress Behav. 2016 May-Jun;42(3):239-53. doi: 10.1002/ab.21614. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
8
Interpretations of bullying by bullies, victims, and bully-victims in interactions at different levels of abstraction.霸凌者、受害者以及兼具霸凌者与受害者双重身份的人在不同抽象层次互动中对霸凌行为的解读。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):54-65. doi: 10.1002/ab.21605. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
9
Popularity differentially predicts reactive and proactive aggression in early adolescence.受欢迎程度对青少年早期的反应性攻击和主动性攻击有不同的预测作用。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):29-40. doi: 10.1002/ab.21603. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
10
Positively Biased Self-Perceptions: Who Has Them and What are Their Effects?积极偏向的自我认知:哪些人拥有以及其影响是什么?
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016 Apr;47(2):305-16. doi: 10.1007/s10578-015-0567-6.