Pharmacology Section, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, SW17 0RE London, UK; UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 ORQ, UK.
Division of Environmental Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Toxicology. 2023 Dec;500:153683. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2023.153683. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
Scientific progress and ethical considerations are increasingly shifting the toxicological focus from in vivo animal models to in vitro studies utilizing physiologically relevant cell cultures. Consequently, we evaluated and validated a three-dimensional (3D) model of the human lung using Calu-3 cells cultured at an air-liquid interface (ALI) for 28 days. Assessment of seven essential genes of differentiation and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements, in conjunction with mucin (MUC5AC) staining, validated the model. We observed a time-dependent increase in TEER, genetic markers of mucus-producing cells (muc5ac, muc5b), basal cells (trp63), ciliated cells (foxj1), and tight junctions (tjp1). A decrease in basal cell marker krt5 levels was observed. Subsequently, we utilized this validated ALI-cultured Calu-3 model to investigate the adversity of the aerosols generated from three flavored electronic cigarette (EC) e-liquids: cinnamon, vanilla tobacco, and hazelnut. These aerosols were compared against traditional cigarette smoke (3R4F) to assess their relative toxicity. The aerosols generated from PG/VG vehicle control, hazelnut and cinnamon e-liquids, but not vanilla tobacco, significantly decreased TEER and increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release compared to the incubator and air-only controls. Compared to 3R4F, there were no significant differences in TEER or LDH with the tested flavored EC aerosols other than vanilla tobacco. This starkly contrasted our expectations, given the common perception of e-liquids as a safer alternative to cigarettes. Our study suggests that these results depend on flavor type. Therefore, we strongly advocate for further research, increased user awareness regarding flavors in ECs, and rigorous regulatory scrutiny to protect public health.
科学进步和伦理考虑因素越来越多地将毒理学的焦点从体内动物模型转移到利用生理相关细胞培养的体外研究。因此,我们使用在气液界面(ALI)培养 28 天的 Calu-3 细胞评估和验证了一种三维(3D)人肺模型。通过评估七种分化的必需基因和跨上皮电阻(TEER)测量值,以及粘蛋白(MUC5AC)染色,验证了该模型。我们观察到 TEER 随时间的增加,粘液产生细胞(muc5ac、muc5b)、基底细胞(trp63)、纤毛细胞(foxj1)和紧密连接(tjp1)的遗传标志物增加。基底细胞标志物 krt5 水平下降。随后,我们利用经过验证的 ALI 培养的 Calu-3 模型来研究三种调味电子烟(EC)烟液产生的气溶胶的危害性:肉桂、香草烟草和榛子。将这些气溶胶与传统香烟烟雾(3R4F)进行比较,以评估它们的相对毒性。与孵育器和仅空气对照相比,PG/VG 载体对照、榛子和肉桂烟液产生的气溶胶显著降低了 TEER 并增加了乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)释放,但香草烟草烟液则不然。与 3R4F 相比,除了香草烟草之外,测试的调味 EC 气溶胶在 TEER 或 LDH 方面没有显著差异。鉴于人们普遍认为电子烟液是香烟的更安全替代品,这与我们的预期形成鲜明对比。我们的研究表明,这些结果取决于风味类型。因此,我们强烈主张进行进一步的研究,提高用户对 EC 中风味的认识,并加强监管审查,以保护公众健康。