Bengalli Rossella, Ferri Emanuele, Labra Massimo, Mantecca Paride
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Research Center POLARIS (Particulate Matter and Health Risk), 1 Piazza della Scienza, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
TRUSTICERT SRL, via Mazzini 18/C, 22036 Erba, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 20;14(10):1254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101254.
The diffusion of e-cigarette (e-CIG) opens a great scientific and regulatory debate about its safety. The huge number of commercialized devices, e-liquids with almost infinite chemical formulations and the growing market demand for a rapid and efficient toxicity screen system that is able to test all of these references and related aerosols. A consensus on the best protocols for the e-CIG safety assessment is still far to be achieved, since the huge number of variables characterizing these products (e.g., flavoring type and concentration, nicotine concentration, type of the device, including the battery and the atomizer). This suggests that more experimental evidences are needed to support the regulatory frameworks. The present study aims to contribute in this field by testing the effects of condensed aerosols (CAs) from three main e-liquid categories (tobacco, mint, and cinnamon as food-related flavor), with (18 mg/mL) or without nicotine. Two in vitro models, represented by a monoculture of human epithelial alveolar cells and a three-dimensional (3D) co-culture of alveolar and lung microvascular endothelial cells were used. Cell viability, pro-inflammatory cytokines release and alveolar-blood barrier (ABB) integrity were investigated as inhalation toxicity endpoints. Results showed that nicotine itself had almost no influence on the modulation of the toxicity response, while flavor composition did have. The cell viability was significantly decreased in monoculture and ABB after exposure to the mints and cinnamon CAs. The barrier integrity was significantly affected in the ABB after exposure to cytotoxic CAs. With the exception of the significant IL-8 release in the monoculture after Cinnamon exposure, no increase of inflammatory cytokines (IL-8 and MCP-1) release was observed. These findings point out that multiple assays with different in vitro models are able to discriminate the acute inhalation toxicity of CAs from liquids with different flavors, providing the companies and regulatory bodies with useful tools for the preliminary screening of marketable products.
电子烟(e-CIG)的普及引发了一场关于其安全性的重大科学和监管辩论。商业化设备数量众多,电子烟液的化学配方几乎无穷无尽,市场对能够测试所有这些产品及相关气雾剂的快速高效毒性筛查系统的需求也在不断增长。由于表征这些产品的变量众多(例如调味剂类型和浓度、尼古丁浓度、设备类型,包括电池和雾化器),关于电子烟安全性评估的最佳方案仍远未达成共识。这表明需要更多实验证据来支持监管框架。本研究旨在通过测试来自三种主要电子烟液类别(烟草、薄荷和肉桂,后者为与食品相关的调味剂)、含(18毫克/毫升)或不含尼古丁的浓缩气雾剂(CAs)的影响,为该领域做出贡献。使用了两种体外模型,分别是人类肺泡上皮细胞的单一培养物以及肺泡和肺微血管内皮细胞的三维(3D)共培养物。将细胞活力、促炎细胞因子释放和肺泡-血液屏障(ABB)完整性作为吸入毒性终点进行研究。结果表明,尼古丁本身对毒性反应的调节几乎没有影响,而调味剂成分则有影响。暴露于薄荷和肉桂CAs后,单一培养物和ABB中的细胞活力显著下降。暴露于细胞毒性CAs后,ABB中的屏障完整性受到显著影响。除肉桂暴露后单一培养物中白细胞介素-8(IL-8)显著释放外,未观察到炎性细胞因子(IL-8和单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1))释放增加。这些发现指出,采用不同体外模型的多种检测方法能够区分不同口味液体中CAs的急性吸入毒性,为公司和监管机构提供用于对可销售产品进行初步筛查的有用工具。