• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨甲环酸与ε-氨基己酸治疗全膝关节置换术疗效比较的Meta 分析:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Comparison of efficacy between tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid for total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Longhua District, Haikou, Hainan Province, China.

Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Longhua District, Haikou, Hainan Province, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Nov 24;102(47):e33876. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033876.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000033876
PMID:38013364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10681596/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) have been demonstrated to reduce blood loss following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TXA and EACA in reducing blood loss in primary TKA patients.

METHODS

A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identified all relevant studies published until December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting a comparison of TXA and EACA for TKA patients were selected. The main outcomes were total blood loss (TBL), hemoglobin (Hb) drop on postoperative day 3, intraoperative blood loss, operation time and the transfusion rate were evaluated. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 739 (TXA:372; EACA:367) patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative blood loss, Hb drop on postoperative day 3, operation time, tourniquet time (TT), transfusion rate and the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) between the 2 treatments groups. However, compared with EACA, TXA significant reduced TBL (WMD, 174.60; 95% CI, -244.09 to -105.11).

CONCLUSION

Our research did not demonstrate TXA to be superior to EACA in reducing need for transfusion and Hb drop. TXA was superior than EACA in reducing TBL in TKA patients. More RCTs with identical inclusion criteria and dose and duration of treatment, are required to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

氨甲环酸(TXA)和氨基己酸(EACA)已被证明可减少全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的失血。本荟萃分析旨在比较 TXA 和 EACA 在减少初次 TKA 患者失血方面的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,直到 2022 年 12 月,检索所有相关研究。选择报告 TXA 和 EACA 用于 TKA 患者比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是总失血量(TBL)、术后第 3 天血红蛋白(Hb)下降、术中失血量、手术时间和输血率。使用固定效应或随机效应模型计算加权均数差(WMD)和风险比(RR)及 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 Stata 12.0 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入 6 项研究共 739 例(TXA:372 例;EACA:367 例)患者。两组间术中失血量、术后第 3 天 Hb 下降、手术时间、止血带时间(TT)、输血率和深静脉血栓形成(DVT)发生率无显著差异。然而,与 EACA 相比,TXA 显著减少 TBL(WMD,-244.09 至-105.11)。

结论

本研究未显示 TXA 在减少输血需求和 Hb 下降方面优于 EACA。TXA 可减少 TKA 患者的 TBL,但需要更多具有相同纳入标准、剂量和治疗时间的 RCT 来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/ff28d26a343d/medi-102-e33876-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/844ceff46317/medi-102-e33876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/9d1fd11da1ac/medi-102-e33876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/b310be7c844b/medi-102-e33876-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/a92a0038dab5/medi-102-e33876-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/97ae26a49df6/medi-102-e33876-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/72b3dd8b2bc9/medi-102-e33876-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/032dcf546b6e/medi-102-e33876-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/049907b4f67f/medi-102-e33876-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/ab625b3347a9/medi-102-e33876-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/5c9c3b444f40/medi-102-e33876-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/8ad18e2edf33/medi-102-e33876-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/38e51edc57b0/medi-102-e33876-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/60b41c64239e/medi-102-e33876-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/ff28d26a343d/medi-102-e33876-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/844ceff46317/medi-102-e33876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/9d1fd11da1ac/medi-102-e33876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/b310be7c844b/medi-102-e33876-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/a92a0038dab5/medi-102-e33876-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/97ae26a49df6/medi-102-e33876-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/72b3dd8b2bc9/medi-102-e33876-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/032dcf546b6e/medi-102-e33876-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/049907b4f67f/medi-102-e33876-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/ab625b3347a9/medi-102-e33876-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/5c9c3b444f40/medi-102-e33876-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/8ad18e2edf33/medi-102-e33876-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/38e51edc57b0/medi-102-e33876-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/60b41c64239e/medi-102-e33876-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bb/10681596/ff28d26a343d/medi-102-e33876-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of efficacy between tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid for total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氨甲环酸与ε-氨基己酸治疗全膝关节置换术疗效比较的Meta 分析:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Nov 24;102(47):e33876. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033876.
2
Combination of Intravenous and Intra-Articular Application of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.静脉和关节内联合应用氨甲环酸和ε-氨基己酸在初次全膝关节置换术中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):687-694. doi: 10.1111/os.13638. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid versus tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study.氨甲环酸与氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换术中的应用:荟萃分析研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0534-2.
4
The Optimal Dose, Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid to Reduce Bleeding in TKA: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.氨甲环酸和ε-氨基己酸在 TKA 中减少出血的最佳剂量、疗效和安全性:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(4):930-946. doi: 10.1111/os.13678. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid in total joint arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial.氨甲环酸或 ε-氨基己酸用于全关节置换术?一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1093-1099. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1096.R1.
6
Comparison between epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid for total hip and knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.ε-氨基己酸与氨甲环酸在全髋关节和膝关节置换术中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Sep-Dec;28(3):2309499020959158. doi: 10.1177/2309499020959158.
7
Safety and efficacy of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) as an antihemorrhagic drug in bilateral one stage total knee arthroplasty: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.ε-氨基己酸(EACA)作为双侧一期全膝关节置换术中抗出血药物的安全性和有效性:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Knee. 2020 Jan;27(1):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Comparing ε-Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Postoperative Transfusions in Total Knee Arthroplasty.比较ε-氨基己酸和氨甲环酸在减少全膝关节置换术后输血中的作用
J Knee Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):460-466. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593362. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
9
Tranexamic acid versus aminocaproic acid for blood management after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氨甲环酸与氨基己酸在全膝关节和全髋关节置换术后血液管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 May 1.
10
Blood Conservation Using Tranexamic Acid Is Not Superior to Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid After Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后使用氨甲环酸进行血液保护并不优于氨基己酸。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1621-1628. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00738.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety study of tranexamic acid combined with low-molecular-weight heparin and nadroparin calcium in postoperative application after joint replacement: a retrospective cohort study.氨甲环酸联合低分子肝素及那屈肝素钙在关节置换术后应用的疗效与安全性研究:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Sep 1;26(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08605-z.