• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医师经验对经股颈动脉支架置入术中卒中或死亡率的影响:来自血管质量改进计划的见解

Impact of Physician Experience on Stroke or Death Rates in Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting: Insights from the Vascular Quality Initiative.

作者信息

Jabbour Gabriel, Yadavalli Sai Divya, Strauss Sabrina, Sanders Andrew P, Rastogi Vinamr, Eldrup-Jorgensen Jens, Powell Richard J, Davis Roger B, Schermerhorn Marc L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Nov 17:2023.11.16.23298660. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.16.23298660.

DOI:10.1101/2023.11.16.23298660
PMID:38014117
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10680887/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the recent expansion of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage, transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS) is expected to play a larger role in the management of carotid disease. Existing research on the tfCAS learning curve, primarily conducted over a decade ago, may not adequately describe the current effect of physician experience on outcomes. This study evaluates the tfCAS learning curve using VQI data.

METHODS

We analyzed tfCAS patient data from 2005-2023. Each physician's procedures were chronologically grouped into 12 categories, from procedure counts 1-25 to 351+. Primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death rate; secondary outcomes were in-hospital stroke/death/MI, 30-day mortality, and in-hospital stroke/TIA. The relationship between outcomes and procedure counts was analyzed using Cochran Armitage test and a generalized linear model with restricted cubic splines, validated using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

We analyzed 43,147 procedures by 2,476 physicians. In symptomatic patients, there was a decrease in rates of in-hospital stroke/death (procedure counts 1-25 to 351+: 5.2% to 1.7%), in-hospital stroke/death/MI (5.8% to 1.7%), 30-day mortality (4.6% to 2.8%), in-hospital stroke/TIA (5.0% to 1.1%) (all p-values<0.05). The in-hospital stroke/death rate remained above 4% until 235 procedures. Similarly, in asymptomatic patients, there was a decrease in rates of in-hospital stroke/death (2.1% to 1.6%), in-hospital stroke/death/MI (2.6% to 1.6%), 30-day mortality (1.7% to 0.4%), and in-hospital stroke/TIA (2.8% to 1.6%) with increasing physician experience (all p-values<0.05). The in-hospital stroke/death rate remained above 2% until 13 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital stroke/death and 30-day mortality rates post-tfCAS decreased with increasing physician experience, showing a lengthy learning curve consistent with previous reports. Given that physicians' early cases may not be included in the VQI, the learning curve was likely underestimated. With the recent CMS coverage expansion for tfCAS, a significant number of physicians would enter the early stage of the learning curve, potentially leading to increased post-operative complications.

摘要

目的

随着医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)覆盖范围的近期扩大,经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(tfCAS)有望在颈动脉疾病管理中发挥更大作用。现有关于tfCAS学习曲线的研究主要在十多年前进行,可能无法充分描述医生经验对治疗结果的当前影响。本研究使用血管质量倡议(VQI)数据评估tfCAS学习曲线。

方法

我们分析了2005年至2023年的tfCAS患者数据。每位医生的手术按时间顺序分为12组,从手术例数1 - 25例到351例以上。主要结局是住院期间卒中/死亡率;次要结局是住院期间卒中/死亡/心肌梗死、30天死亡率以及住院期间卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)。使用 Cochr an Armitage检验和带有受限立方样条的广义线性模型分析结局与手术例数之间的关系,并使用广义估计方程进行验证。

结果

我们分析了2476名医生的43147例手术。在有症状的患者中,住院期间卒中/死亡率(手术例数1 - 25例到351例以上:5.2%至1.7%)、住院期间卒中/死亡/心肌梗死率(5.8%至1.7%)、30天死亡率(4.6%至2.8%)、住院期间卒中/TIA率(5.0%至1.1%)均有所下降(所有p值<0.05)。住院期间卒中/死亡率在235例手术之前一直高于4%。同样,在无症状患者中,随着医生经验增加,住院期间卒中/死亡率(2.1%至1.6%)、住院期间卒中/死亡/心肌梗死率(2.6%至1.6%)、30天死亡率(1.7%至0.4%)以及住院期间卒中/TIA率(2.8%至1.6%)均有所下降(所有p值<0.05)。住院期间卒中/死亡率在13例手术之前一直高于2%。

结论

tfCAS术后住院期间卒中/死亡率和30天死亡率随着医生经验增加而降低,显示出与先前报告一致的漫长学习曲线。鉴于VQI可能未纳入医生的早期病例,学习曲线可能被低估。随着CMS近期对tfCAS覆盖范围的扩大,大量医生将进入学习曲线的早期阶段,可能导致术后并发症增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a7b/10680887/68e5b7aecb7f/nihpp-2023.11.16.23298660v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a7b/10680887/88dc6aa0e993/nihpp-2023.11.16.23298660v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a7b/10680887/68e5b7aecb7f/nihpp-2023.11.16.23298660v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a7b/10680887/88dc6aa0e993/nihpp-2023.11.16.23298660v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a7b/10680887/68e5b7aecb7f/nihpp-2023.11.16.23298660v1-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Physician Experience on Stroke or Death Rates in Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting: Insights from the Vascular Quality Initiative.医师经验对经股颈动脉支架置入术中卒中或死亡率的影响:来自血管质量改进计划的见解
medRxiv. 2023 Nov 17:2023.11.16.23298660. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.16.23298660.
2
Learning curve of transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry.经股颈动脉支架置入术在血管质量倡议注册研究中的学习曲线。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):138-150.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.026. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
5
Carotid lesion length independently predicts stroke and death after transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.颈动脉病变长度可独立预测经颈动脉血管重建术和经股颈动脉支架置入术后的中风和死亡情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1615-1623.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.099. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Outcomes after transfemoral carotid artery stenting stratified by preprocedural symptom status.经股颈动脉支架置入术患者的术前症状分层预后。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2021-2029. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.031. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
7
Perioperative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral and transcervical carotid artery stenting in radiation-induced carotid lesions.放射性颈动脉病变行颈动脉内膜切除术、经股动脉和经颈动脉腔内治疗的围手术期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):915-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.087. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
8
Carotid stenosis patients with a remote history of cerebrovascular events have increased risk of major adverse events over asymptomatic patients.有脑血管事件既往史的颈动脉狭窄患者发生主要不良事件的风险高于无症状患者。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1625-1632. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Performance of Carotid Revascularization Procedures as Modified by Sex.按性别分类的颈动脉血运重建手术效果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;81:171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.051. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
10
The role of transfemoral carotid artery stenting with proximal balloon occlusion embolic protection in the contemporary endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术联合近端球囊阻断栓塞保护在当代颈动脉狭窄血管内治疗中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1701-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race.新型基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的估算肾小球滤过率方程,无需考虑种族因素。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1737-1749. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102953. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
2
European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.欧洲卒中组织关于颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术和支架置入术的指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Jun;6(2):I-XLVII. doi: 10.1177/23969873211012121. Epub 2021 May 11.
3
Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up in Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.
颅外颈动脉狭窄的诊断、治疗和随访。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Nov 20;117(47):801-807. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0801.
4
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization with Dynamic Flow Reversal Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy.经颈动脉动态血流逆转血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术及颈动脉内膜切除术的系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;69:426-436. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.070. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
5
In-hospital outcomes alone underestimate rates of 30-day major adverse events after carotid artery stenting.仅院内结局就低估了颈动脉支架置入术后 30 天主要不良事件的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;71(4):1233-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.201. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.经颈动脉血运重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄患者卒中和死亡的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 17;322(23):2313-2322. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18441.
7
Learning Curve for Surgeons Adopting Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Based on the Vascular Quality Initiative-Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Surveillance Project.基于血管质量倡议-颈动脉血运重建监测项目的外科医生采用经颈动脉血管重建术的学习曲线。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
8
In-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的院内转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.029. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
The learning curve of transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建术的学习曲线。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;70(2):516-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.115. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
A multi-institutional analysis of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to carotid endarterectomy.多机构分析经颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.060. Epub 2019 Jan 6.