• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经股颈动脉支架置入术在血管质量倡议注册研究中的学习曲线。

Learning curve of transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):138-150.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.026. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.026
PMID:38428653
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the recent expansion of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage, transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS) is expected to play a larger role in the management of carotid disease. Existing research on the tfCAS learning curve, primarily conducted over a decade ago, may not adequately describe the current effect of physician experience on outcomes. Because approximately 30% of perioperative strokes/deaths post-CAS occur after discharge, appropriate thresholds for in-hospital event rates have been suggested to be <4% for symptomatic and <2% for asymptomatic patients. This study evaluates the tfCAS learning curve using Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data.

METHODS

We identified VQI patients who underwent tfCAS between 2005 and 2023. Each physician's procedures were chronologically grouped into 12 categories, from procedure counts 1-25 to 351+. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death rate; secondary outcomes were in-hospital stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI), 30-day mortality, in-hospital stroke/transient ischemic attack (stroke/TIA), and access site complications. The relationship between outcomes and procedure counts was analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test and a generalized linear model with restricted cubic splines. Our results were then validated using a generalized estimating equations model to account for the variability between physicians.

RESULTS

We analyzed 43,147 procedures by 2476 physicians. In symptomatic patients, there was a decrease in rates of in-hospital stroke/death (procedure counts 1-25 to 351+: 5.2%-1.7%), in-hospital stroke/death/MI (5.8%-1.7%), 30-day mortality (4.6%-2.8%), in-hospital stroke/TIA (5.0%-1.1%), and access site complications (4.1%-1.1%) as physician experience increased (all P values < .05). The in-hospital stroke/death rate remained above 4% until 235 procedures. Similarly, in asymptomatic patients, there was a decrease in rates of in-hospital stroke/death (2.1%-1.6%), in-hospital stroke/death/MI (2.6%-1.6%), 30-day mortality (1.7%-0.4%), and in-hospital stroke/TIA (2.8%-1.6%) with increasing physician experience (all P values <.05). The in-hospital stroke/death rate remained above 2% until 13 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital stroke/death and 30-day mortality rates after tfCAS decreased with increasing physician experience, showing a lengthy learning curve consistent with previous reports. Given that physicians' early cases may not be included in the VQI, the learning curve was likely underestimated. Nevertheless, a substantially high rate of in-hospital stroke/death was found in physicians' first 25 procedures. With the recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage expansion for tfCAS, a significant number of physicians would enter the early stage of the learning curve, potentially leading to increased postoperative complications.

摘要

目的

随着医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)覆盖范围的扩大,股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(transfemoral carotid artery stenting,tfCAS)预计将在颈动脉疾病的治疗中发挥更大的作用。现有的关于 tfCAS 学习曲线的研究主要是在十多年前进行的,可能无法充分描述当前医生经验对结果的影响。由于大约 30%的颈动脉支架置入术(carotid artery stenting,CAS)后围手术期卒中/死亡发生在出院后,因此建议适当的住院期间事件发生率阈值为:症状性患者<4%,无症状患者<2%。本研究使用血管质量倡议(Vascular Quality Initiative,VQI)数据评估 tfCAS 的学习曲线。

方法

我们确定了 2005 年至 2023 年期间接受 tfCAS 的 VQI 患者。每位医生的手术按时间顺序分为 12 组,从手术例数 1-25 到 351+。主要结局是住院期间卒中/死亡发生率;次要结局包括住院期间卒中/死亡/心肌梗死(myocardial infarction,MI)、30 天死亡率、住院期间卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作(transient ischemic attack,TIA)和入路部位并发症。使用 Cochran-Armitage 检验和具有限制立方样条的广义线性模型分析结局与手术例数之间的关系。我们的结果随后使用广义估计方程模型进行验证,以考虑医生之间的变异性。

结果

我们分析了 2476 名医生的 43147 例手术。在症状性患者中,随着医生经验的增加,住院期间卒中/死亡(手术例数 1-25 到 351+:5.2%-1.7%)、住院期间卒中/死亡/MI(5.8%-1.7%)、30 天死亡率(4.6%-2.8%)、住院期间卒中/TIA(5.0%-1.1%)和入路部位并发症(4.1%-1.1%)的发生率降低(所有 P 值均<.05)。住院期间卒中/死亡发生率仍高于 4%,直到 235 例手术。同样,在无症状患者中,随着医生经验的增加,住院期间卒中/死亡(2.1%-1.6%)、住院期间卒中/死亡/MI(2.6%-1.6%)、30 天死亡率(1.7%-0.4%)和住院期间卒中/TIA(2.8%-1.6%)的发生率降低(所有 P 值均<.05)。住院期间卒中/死亡发生率仍高于 2%,直到 13 例手术。

结论

tfCAS 后住院期间卒中/死亡和 30 天死亡率随着医生经验的增加而降低,这表明存在与以往报道一致的较长学习曲线。鉴于医生的早期病例可能未包含在 VQI 中,因此学习曲线可能被低估了。尽管如此,在医生的前 25 例手术中仍发现了相当高的住院期间卒中/死亡发生率。随着医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心最近对 tfCAS 覆盖范围的扩大,大量医生将进入学习曲线的早期阶段,可能导致术后并发症增加。

相似文献

1
Learning curve of transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry.经股颈动脉支架置入术在血管质量倡议注册研究中的学习曲线。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):138-150.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.026. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Impact of Physician Experience on Stroke or Death Rates in Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting: Insights from the Vascular Quality Initiative.医师经验对经股颈动脉支架置入术中卒中或死亡率的影响:来自血管质量改进计划的见解
medRxiv. 2023 Nov 17:2023.11.16.23298660. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.16.23298660.
3
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Complexity of Aortic Arch Anatomy Affects the Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.主动脉弓解剖结构的复杂性对经颈动脉血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的疗效产生影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
5
Outcomes after transfemoral carotid artery stenting stratified by preprocedural symptom status.经股颈动脉支架置入术患者的术前症状分层预后。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2021-2029. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.031. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy.年龄对经颈动脉血管重建术、经股颈动脉血管支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术住院治疗结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):931-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Perioperative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral and transcervical carotid artery stenting in radiation-induced carotid lesions.放射性颈动脉病变行颈动脉内膜切除术、经股动脉和经颈动脉腔内治疗的围手术期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):915-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.087. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
8
Investigation of the weekend effect on perioperative complications and mortality after carotid revascularization.调查颈动脉血运重建术后围手术期并发症和死亡率的周末效应。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1487-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.06.163. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
9
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.
10
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of postoperative stroke after transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术后卒中的预测因素
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.023.
2
Effectiveness of Transcarotid vs Transfemoral Carotid Stenting for Stroke Prevention.经颈动脉与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中的有效性比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e259143. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9143.