Albers Richard, Lemke Stella, Knapp Sebastian, Krischak Gert, Bethge Matthias
Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
GOREHA GmbH, Neue Schönhauser Straße 20, 10178 Berlin, Germany.
BMC Digit Health. 2023;1(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
Physiotherapeutic telerehabilitation in various musculoskeletal and internal diseases, including back pain, might be comparable to face-to-face rehabilitation or better than non-rehabilitation. In Germany, a standardized back school for patients with chronic back pain is provided in outpatient rehabilitation centers. The effectiveness of this standardized back school was shown in a randomized controlled trial in face-to-face rehabilitation. This study examines non-inferiority of a hybrid rehabilitation applying a digital version of the standardized back school against a rehabilitation applying the face-to-face back school.
METHODS/DESIGN: We recruit 320 patients in eight German outpatient rehabilitation centers. Patients are randomized equally to the intervention and control groups. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with back pain are included. Patients lacking a suitable private electronic device and German language skills are excluded. Both groups receive the standardized back school as part of the 3-week rehabilitation program. The control group receives the back school conventionally in face-to-face meetings within the outpatient rehabilitation center. The intervention group receives the back school online using a private electronic device. Besides the back school, the patients participate in rehabilitation programs according to the German rehabilitation guideline for patients with chronic back pain. Hence, the term "hybrid" rehabilitation for the intervention group is used. The back school consists of seven modules. We assess data at four time points: start of rehabilitation, end of rehabilitation, 3 months after the end of rehabilitation and, 12 months after the end of rehabilitation. The primary outcome is pain self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes are, amongst others, motivational self-efficacy, cognitive and behavioral pain management, and disorder and treatment knowledge. Guided interviews with patients, physicians, physiotherapists and other health experts supplement our study with qualitative data.
DISCUSSION/AIM: Our randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online back school, compared to conventional implementation of the back school.
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028770, April 05, 2022).
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4.
包括背痛在内的各种肌肉骨骼疾病和内科疾病的物理治疗远程康复可能与面对面康复相当,或优于非康复治疗。在德国,门诊康复中心为慢性背痛患者提供标准化的背痛学校。这项标准化背痛学校的有效性在一项面对面康复的随机对照试验中得到了证实。本研究旨在检验应用标准化背痛学校数字版的混合康复与应用面对面背痛学校的康复相比是否不劣效。
方法/设计:我们在德国的八个门诊康复中心招募320名患者。患者被平均随机分配到干预组和对照组。纳入年龄在18至65岁之间的背痛患者。排除没有合适的私人电子设备和德语技能的患者。两组均接受标准化背痛学校作为为期3周康复计划的一部分。对照组在门诊康复中心内通过面对面会议常规接受背痛学校培训。干预组使用私人电子设备在线接受背痛学校培训。除了背痛学校,患者还根据德国慢性背痛患者康复指南参加康复计划。因此,干预组采用“混合”康复这一术语。背痛学校由七个模块组成。我们在四个时间点评估数据:康复开始时、康复结束时、康复结束后3个月以及康复结束后12个月。主要结局是疼痛自我效能感。次要结局包括动机自我效能感、认知和行为疼痛管理以及疾病和治疗知识等。对患者、医生、物理治疗师和其他健康专家进行的访谈为我们的研究补充了定性数据。
讨论/目的:我们的随机对照试验旨在证明与传统的背痛学校实施方式相比,在线背痛学校不劣效。
德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00028770,2022年4月5日)。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4获取的补充材料。