Department of Epidemiology Fudan University Shanghai China.
Department of Epidemiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA USA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e031217. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031217. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) has been widely used as a predictor of future cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, various definitions of cIMT exist. This study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between different cIMT definitions and CVD.
A systematic review of the different cIMT definitions used in prospective cohort studies was performed. The relationships between cIMT of different definitions (common carotid artery IMT [CCA-IMT], internal carotid artery IMT [ICA-IMT], combined segments [combined-IMT], mean CCA-IMT, and maximum CCA-IMT) with future stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and CVD events were analyzed using random effects models. Among 2287 articles, 18 articles (14 studies) with >10 different cIMT definitions were identified and included in our meta-analysis. After adjusting for age and sex, a 1-SD increase in CCA-IMT was associated with future stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.27-1.38]), MI (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.22-1.33]), and CVD events (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.19-1.37]). A 1-SD increase in ICA-IMT was related to future stroke (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11-1.42]) and CVD events (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.04-1.50]) but not MI (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.98-1.61]). A 1-SD increase in combined-IMT was associated with future stroke (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.08-1.57]) and CVD events (HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.23-1.49]). Maximum CCA-IMT was more strongly related than mean CCA-IMT with risk of MI, and both measures were similarly associated with stroke and CVD events.
Combined-IMT is more strongly associated with CVD events compared with single-segment cIMT definitions. Maximum CCA-IMT shows a stronger association with MI than mean CCA-IMT. Further research is warranted to validate our findings and to standardize the cIMT measurement protocol, as well as to explore underlying mechanisms.
颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)已被广泛用作未来心血管疾病(CVD)的预测指标;然而,cIMT 有多种定义。本研究对不同 cIMT 定义与 CVD 之间的关系进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。
对前瞻性队列研究中使用的不同 cIMT 定义进行了系统回顾。使用随机效应模型分析了不同定义的 cIMT(颈总动脉内膜中层厚度[CCA-IMT]、颈内动脉内膜中层厚度[ICA-IMT]、综合节段[综合-IMT]、平均 CCA-IMT 和最大 CCA-IMT)与未来卒中、心肌梗死(MI)和 CVD 事件之间的关系。在 2287 篇文章中,确定了 18 篇(14 项研究)有超过 10 种不同的 cIMT 定义的文章,并纳入了我们的荟萃分析。在校正年龄和性别后,CCA-IMT 每增加 1 个标准差,与未来卒中(危险比[HR],1.32[95%CI,1.27-1.38])、MI(HR,1.27[95%CI,1.22-1.33])和 CVD 事件(HR,1.28[95%CI,1.19-1.37])相关。ICA-IMT 每增加 1 个标准差与未来卒中(HR,1.25[95%CI,1.11-1.42])和 CVD 事件(HR,1.25[95%CI,1.04-1.50])相关,但与 MI 无关(HR,1.26[95%CI,0.98-1.61])。综合-IMT 每增加 1 个标准差与未来卒中(HR,1.30[95%CI,1.08-1.57])和 CVD 事件(HR,1.36[95%CI,1.23-1.49])相关。最大 CCA-IMT 与 MI 的风险相关性强于平均 CCA-IMT,且与卒中和 CVD 事件的相关性相似。
与单一节段 cIMT 定义相比,综合-IMT 与 CVD 事件的相关性更强。最大 CCA-IMT 与 MI 的相关性强于平均 CCA-IMT。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的发现,并标准化 cIMT 测量方案,以及探索潜在的机制。