Galler Martina, Varela Paula
Nofima AS, Ås, Norway.
J Texture Stud. 2023 Nov 28. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12813.
In contrast to taste sensitivity, the assessment of texture or tactile sensitivity has received relatively little attention in the food context. Texture plays an important role in food preferences and food intake, and individual differences make it important to understand physiological drivers of perception as tactile sensitivity. The multi-dimensional and dynamic aspects of texture perception suggest there is not one single method that can explain individual differences. This scoping review aims to systematically map methods assessing tactile sensitivity, in the context of food, highlighting differences in approach and implementation. Eligibility criteria included papers describing methods to assess individual differences in tactile sensitivity, that involved human participants and the context was relevant to food behavior. Sources are peer-reviewed publications of original research in English. In mapping the methods, we assessed how they relate to food texture parameters (mechanical, geometrical, and surface) and the dynamics of breaking down (touch with hand, first bite/sip, oral processing, residual or after-swallowing sensations). We also review other parameters associated (oral processing, preference, diet and food intake behavior). The literature in this relatively young area is still very fragmented and it is difficult to have a clear picture regarding best practices or recommendations for the measurement of tactile sensitivity in the food context. Future studies should aim to methodological harmonization for application in the food behavior area, with a design of experiment combining different aspects of tactile sensitivity to food, focusing on the thresholds and perceived intensity of textural parameters as well as affective and behavioral responses, and covering the whole spectrum of tactile texture perception (mechanical, geometrics, and surface), including the dynamics of perception.
与味觉敏感性相比,在食物背景下,质地或触觉敏感性的评估受到的关注相对较少。质地在食物偏好和食物摄入量中起着重要作用,个体差异使得了解作为触觉敏感性的感知生理驱动因素变得很重要。质地感知的多维度和动态方面表明,没有一种单一的方法可以解释个体差异。本综述旨在系统地梳理在食物背景下评估触觉敏感性的方法,突出方法和实施方面的差异。纳入标准包括描述评估触觉敏感性个体差异方法的论文,这些方法涉及人类参与者且背景与食物行为相关。来源为英文的原创研究同行评审出版物。在梳理方法时,我们评估了它们与食物质地参数(机械、几何和表面)以及分解动态(用手触摸、第一口咬/啜饮、口腔加工、残留或吞咽后感觉)的关系。我们还回顾了其他相关参数(口腔加工、偏好、饮食和食物摄入行为)。这个相对较新的领域的文献仍然非常零散,很难对食物背景下触觉敏感性测量的最佳实践或建议有一个清晰的认识。未来的研究应旨在实现方法的统一,以便应用于食物行为领域,设计一个结合食物触觉敏感性不同方面的实验,关注质地参数的阈值和感知强度以及情感和行为反应,并涵盖触觉质地感知的整个范围(机械、几何和表面),包括感知动态。