• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在生命线队列研究基线时对2015年荷兰健康饮食指数的评估。

Assessment of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 in the Lifelines cohort study at baseline.

作者信息

Baart A Mireille, Brouwer-Brolsma Elske M, de Jong Hanne B T, de Vries Jeanne H M, Feskens Edith J M

机构信息

Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Mar;78(3):217-227. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01372-x. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1038/s41430-023-01372-x
PMID:38017142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10927538/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dietary indices are useful measures to investigate associations between dietary intake and disease development. The Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 (DHD2015-index), a measure of diet quality, assesses adherence to the 2015 Dutch dietary guidelines. We assessed the DHD2015-index in the Lifelines cohort study, and compared calculations from basic and detailed dietary intake data. This article replaces the retracted article that was published on 16 May 2022 [1].

METHODS

Dietary intake was assessed with a specially developed Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) called Flower-FFQ, which consists of one main questionnaire (heart-FFQ), which asks for intakes of major food groups, and three complementary questionnaires (petal-FFQs), which ask for detailed information on food types within major food groups of the heart-FFQ. The DHD2015-index was assessed using data from the total Flower-FFQ (for 56,982 participants), and using data from the heart-FFQ only (for 129,030 participants). Agreement between the two indices was assessed with correlation and cross-classification.

RESULTS

The median (25th-75th percentile) DHD2015-index score was 75 (65-85) for men and 81 (70-91) for women based on the Flower-FFQ, and 68 (58-77) for men and 73 (63-82) for women based on the heart-FFQ. The Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.67 for men and 0.66 for women. Cross-classification into quartiles of the DHD2015-index showed that 59-60% of participants were classified in the same quartile, 36-37% in the adjacent, and 4% in the non-adjacent.

CONCLUSION

Dietary data from the Flower-FFQ provide the most optimal information to assess the DHD2015-index. However, the DHD2015-index from the heart-FFQ showed good agreement with the index from the Flower-FFQ of ranking participants according to diet quality, and can be used when the DHD2015 index from the Flower-FFQ is not available.

摘要

背景

饮食指数是研究饮食摄入与疾病发展之间关联的有用指标。荷兰健康饮食指数2015(DHD2015指数)是一种饮食质量衡量指标,用于评估对2015年荷兰饮食指南的遵循情况。我们在生命线队列研究中评估了DHD2015指数,并比较了基于基本和详细饮食摄入数据的计算结果。本文取代了2022年5月16日发表的撤回文章[1]。

方法

饮食摄入通过一份专门开发的名为Flower-FFQ的食物频率问卷(FFQ)进行评估,该问卷由一份主要问卷(心脏-FFQ)组成,询问主要食物组的摄入量,以及三份补充问卷(花瓣-FFQ),询问心脏-FFQ主要食物组内食物类型的详细信息。使用来自整个Flower-FFQ的数据(针对56982名参与者)和仅来自心脏-FFQ的数据(针对129030名参与者)评估DHD2015指数。通过相关性和交叉分类评估两个指数之间的一致性。

结果

基于Flower-FFQ,男性的DHD2015指数中位数(第25-75百分位数)为75(65-85),女性为81(70-91);基于心脏-FFQ,男性为68(58-77),女性为73(63-82)。两个分数之间的肯德尔tau-b相关系数男性为0.67,女性为0.66。将DHD2015指数分为四分位数的交叉分类显示,59-60%的参与者被归为同一四分位数,36-37%在相邻四分位数,4%在非相邻四分位数。

结论

来自Flower-FFQ的饮食数据为评估DHD2015指数提供了最优化的信息。然而,来自心脏-FFQ的DHD2015指数在根据饮食质量对参与者进行排名方面与来自Flower-FFQ的指数显示出良好的一致性,并且在无法获得来自Flower-FFQ的DHD2015指数时可以使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a320/10927538/58ebee3c030f/41430_2023_1372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a320/10927538/58ebee3c030f/41430_2023_1372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a320/10927538/58ebee3c030f/41430_2023_1372_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 in the Lifelines cohort study at baseline.在生命线队列研究基线时对2015年荷兰健康饮食指数的评估。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Mar;78(3):217-227. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01372-x. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Development and evaluation of a diet quality screener to assess adherence to the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines.用于评估对荷兰基于食物的膳食指南依从性的饮食质量筛查工具的开发与评估。
Br J Nutr. 2021 Nov 15;128(8):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521004499.
3
Development and external validation of the 'Flower-FFQ': a FFQ designed for the Lifelines Cohort Study.开发并外部验证“Flower-FFQ”:为 Lifelines 队列研究设计的 FFQ。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):225-236. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002111. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Association between diet quality and all-cause mortality in a large Dutch cohort.饮食质量与大型荷兰队列全因死亡率的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 23;19(8):e0302905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302905. eCollection 2024.
5
Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Food Group Intake in Pregnant Jordanian Women.评估约旦孕妇食物组摄入量的食物频率问卷的相对有效性和可重复性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Aug;119(8):1349-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers.白厅Ⅱ研究中的饮食评估:7天饮食日记与食物频率问卷的比较及与生物标志物相比的效度
Br J Nutr. 2001 Sep;86(3):405-14. doi: 10.1079/bjn2001414.
7
Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record.在线膳食摄入量估计:Food4Me食物频率问卷相对于4天称重食物记录的可重复性和有效性。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Aug 11;16(8):e190. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3355.
8
Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire.在线膳食摄入量评估:Food4Me食物频率问卷
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 9;16(6):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3105.
9
Dietary Intake in the Lifelines Cohort Study: Baseline Results from the Flower Food Frequency Questionnaire among 59,982 Participants.饮食摄入在 Lifelines 队列研究中:来自 59982 名参与者的花类食物频率问卷的基线结果。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 23;14(1):48. doi: 10.3390/nu14010048.
10
Relative validity of a short screener to assess diet quality in patients with severe obesity before and after bariatric surgery.一种短筛选工具评估重度肥胖患者减肥手术前后饮食质量的相对效度。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jul 4;25(10):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022001501.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between diet quality and all-cause mortality in a large Dutch cohort.饮食质量与大型荷兰队列全因死亡率的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 23;19(8):e0302905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302905. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Assessment of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 in the Lifelines cohort study at baseline.撤回文章:在生命线队列研究基线时对2015年荷兰健康饮食指数的评估。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jan;78(1):77. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01163-w. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Dietary Intake in the Lifelines Cohort Study: Baseline Results from the Flower Food Frequency Questionnaire among 59,982 Participants.饮食摄入在 Lifelines 队列研究中:来自 59982 名参与者的花类食物频率问卷的基线结果。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 23;14(1):48. doi: 10.3390/nu14010048.
3
Cohort Profile Update: Lifelines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank.
队列简介更新:生命线研究,一项三代队列研究及生物样本库。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 13;51(5):e295-e302. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab257.
4
Development and evaluation of a diet quality screener to assess adherence to the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines.用于评估对荷兰基于食物的膳食指南依从性的饮食质量筛查工具的开发与评估。
Br J Nutr. 2021 Nov 15;128(8):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521004499.
5
Development and external validation of the 'Flower-FFQ': a FFQ designed for the Lifelines Cohort Study.开发并外部验证“Flower-FFQ”:为 Lifelines 队列研究设计的 FFQ。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):225-236. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002111. Epub 2021 May 14.
6
Development of healthy and sustainable food-based dietary guidelines for the Netherlands.制定荷兰健康和可持续的基于食物的膳食指南。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Sep;22(13):2419-2435. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001435. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
Dietary assessment methods in epidemiological research: current state of the art and future prospects.流行病学研究中的膳食评估方法:当前技术水平与未来前景
F1000Res. 2017 Jun 16;6:926. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10703.1. eCollection 2017.
8
Development and evaluation of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015.荷兰健康饮食指数 2015 的制定与评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2289-2299. doi: 10.1017/S136898001700091X. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
9
BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods.研究发现,体重指数(BMI)是一个与使用自我报告法和重复称量法时能量、蛋白质及钾摄入量误报相关的一致决定因素。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(4):598-607. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002743. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
10
The 2015 Dutch food-based dietary guidelines.2015年荷兰基于食物的膳食指南。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;70(8):869-78. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.52. Epub 2016 Apr 6.