Suppr超能文献

变坡角对越野坐式滑雪生物力学的影响。

Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing.

机构信息

Sports Biomechanics Center, Sports Artificial Intelligence Institute, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, No. 11 North Third Ring Road West, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.

Biomechanics Lab, Department of Mechanics, School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48359-z.

Abstract

Cross-country sit-skiers use double poling (DP) technique to drive the slide. The aim of this study is to analyze how poling camber angle affect the capacity of power output and biomechanical parameters of the DP process. Twenty-four non-disabled college students (24.67 ± 1.46 years old) were recruited to perform three successive 30-s maximal effort tests with different poling camber angles of 0°, 15°, 24° and 30° using a sit-skiing ergometer. The biomechanical parameters, output power and muscle activation of the subjects were analyzed. The results showed that DP output power increased with the increase of poling camber angle at 15° (597.78 ± 150.31 J), 24° (610.94 ± 158.96 J, P = 0.011) and 30° (629.10 ± 168.78 J, P < 0.001) compared with 0° (590.65 ± 148.95 J). However, effective output power decreased with the increase of camber angle. Poling with camber angle of 24° had the shortest cycle time 1.53 ± 0.17 s, compared with other abduction angle (0°, 1.57 ± 0.19 s, 15°, 1.55 ± 0.16 s, and 30°, 1.56 ± 0.19 s). Compared with 0° (1.02 ± 0.14 m), the cycle distance significantly increased at poling camber angles of 24° (1.07 ± 0.12 m, P = 0.029) and 30° (1.11 ± 0.13 m, P < 0.001). With the increase of poling camber angle, the shoulder and elbow joint range of motions and joint moments were significantly increased. This study found that poling with shoulder abducted increased the output power but decreased the efficiency. By analyzing the poling angle and poling force, we find that the optimal poling camber angle may depend on the terrain or the skiing speed. These results may guide the competition techniques and tactics in the matches, and may further influence the strength-training programs of cross-country sit-skiing athletes.

摘要

越野坐姿滑雪运动员使用双杖技术来驱动滑行。本研究旨在分析撑杆弯曲角度如何影响功率输出能力和 DP 过程的生物力学参数。 24 名非残疾大学生(24.67±1.46 岁)被招募使用坐姿滑雪测功计进行三次连续 30 秒最大努力测试,撑杆弯曲角度分别为 0°、15°、24°和 30°。分析了受试者的生物力学参数、输出功率和肌肉激活情况。结果表明,与 0°(590.65±148.95J)相比,15°(597.78±150.31J)、24°(610.94±158.96J,P=0.011)和 30°(629.10±168.78J,P<0.001)时 DP 输出功率增加。然而,有效输出功率随着弯曲角度的增加而降低。与其他外展角(0°、1.57±0.19 s、15°、1.55±0.16 s 和 30°、1.56±0.19 s)相比,24°撑杆的周期时间最短为 1.53±0.17 s。与 0°(1.02±0.14 m)相比,24°(1.07±0.12 m,P=0.029)和 30°(1.11±0.13 m,P<0.001)时的周期距离显著增加。随着撑杆弯曲角度的增加,肩肘关节运动范围和关节力矩显著增加。本研究发现,肩部外展增加了撑杆的输出功率,但降低了效率。通过分析撑杆角度和撑杆力,我们发现最佳撑杆弯曲角度可能取决于地形或滑雪速度。这些结果可能指导比赛中的竞赛技术和策略,并可能进一步影响越野坐姿滑雪运动员的力量训练计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2913/10684654/0cb8ec5f0826/41598_2023_48359_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48359-z.
2
Upper limb isokinetic muscle strength predicts the performance in cross-country sit-skiing.
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 12;12(1):6093. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10103-4.
4
Double-Poling Biomechanics of Elite Cross-country Skiers: Flat versus Uphill Terrain.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Aug;48(8):1580-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000943.
5
Control of speed during the double poling technique performed by elite cross-country skiers.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):210-20. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318184f436.
6
Contribution of the legs to double-poling performance in elite cross-country skiers.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Oct;38(10):1853-60. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000230121.83641.d1.
7
Gender differences in endurance performance by elite cross-country skiers are influenced by the contribution from poling.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Feb;24(1):28-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01482.x. Epub 2012 May 24.
8
Effects of upper-body sprint-interval training on strength and endurance capacities in female cross-country skiers.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 27;12(2):e0172706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172706. eCollection 2017.
9
Exercise-induced trunk fatigue decreases double poling performance in well-trained cross-country skiers.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Oct;118(10):2077-2087. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3938-4. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
10
The effect of exercise intensity on joint power and dynamics in ergometer double-poling performed by cross-country skiers.
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Feb;57:83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of synergy-assisted EMG-driven NMSK model for upper limb muscle activation prediction in cross-country sit-skiing double poling.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 18;13:1585127. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1585127. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilateral upper extremity trunk model for cross-country sit-skiing double poling propulsion: model development and validation.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2023 Feb;61(2):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02724-8. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
2
Upper limb isokinetic muscle strength predicts the performance in cross-country sit-skiing.
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 12;12(1):6093. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10103-4.
3
Physiological responses and cycle characteristics during double-poling versus diagonal-stride roller-skiing in junior cross-country skiers.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Aug;121(8):2229-2241. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04689-2. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
4
Effect of Sitting Posture on Sit-Skiing Economy in Non-disabled Athletes.
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Apr 28;2:44. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00044. eCollection 2020.
5
Biomechanical determinants of cross-country skiing performance: A systematic review.
J Sports Sci. 2020 Sep;38(18):2127-2148. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1775375. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Muscle Contributions to Upper-Extremity Movement and Work From a Musculoskeletal Model of the Human Shoulder.
Front Neurorobot. 2019 Nov 5;13:90. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2019.00090. eCollection 2019.
7
Stronger Is Better: The Impact of Upper Body Strength in Double Poling Performance.
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 23;10:1091. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01091. eCollection 2019.
8
Biomechanical differences in double poling between sexes and level of performance during a classical cross-country skiing competition.
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jul;37(14):1582-1590. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1577119. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Shoulder and Lower Back Joint Reaction Forces in Seated Double Poling.
J Appl Biomech. 2018 Oct 1;34(5):369-376. doi: 10.1123/jab.2017-0281. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
10
Improving Mobility Performance in Wheelchair Basketball.
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):59-66. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0142.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验