Sports Biomechanics Center, Sports Artificial Intelligence Institute, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, No. 11 North Third Ring Road West, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Biomechanics Lab, Department of Mechanics, School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48359-z.
Cross-country sit-skiers use double poling (DP) technique to drive the slide. The aim of this study is to analyze how poling camber angle affect the capacity of power output and biomechanical parameters of the DP process. Twenty-four non-disabled college students (24.67 ± 1.46 years old) were recruited to perform three successive 30-s maximal effort tests with different poling camber angles of 0°, 15°, 24° and 30° using a sit-skiing ergometer. The biomechanical parameters, output power and muscle activation of the subjects were analyzed. The results showed that DP output power increased with the increase of poling camber angle at 15° (597.78 ± 150.31 J), 24° (610.94 ± 158.96 J, P = 0.011) and 30° (629.10 ± 168.78 J, P < 0.001) compared with 0° (590.65 ± 148.95 J). However, effective output power decreased with the increase of camber angle. Poling with camber angle of 24° had the shortest cycle time 1.53 ± 0.17 s, compared with other abduction angle (0°, 1.57 ± 0.19 s, 15°, 1.55 ± 0.16 s, and 30°, 1.56 ± 0.19 s). Compared with 0° (1.02 ± 0.14 m), the cycle distance significantly increased at poling camber angles of 24° (1.07 ± 0.12 m, P = 0.029) and 30° (1.11 ± 0.13 m, P < 0.001). With the increase of poling camber angle, the shoulder and elbow joint range of motions and joint moments were significantly increased. This study found that poling with shoulder abducted increased the output power but decreased the efficiency. By analyzing the poling angle and poling force, we find that the optimal poling camber angle may depend on the terrain or the skiing speed. These results may guide the competition techniques and tactics in the matches, and may further influence the strength-training programs of cross-country sit-skiing athletes.
越野坐姿滑雪运动员使用双杖技术来驱动滑行。本研究旨在分析撑杆弯曲角度如何影响功率输出能力和 DP 过程的生物力学参数。 24 名非残疾大学生(24.67±1.46 岁)被招募使用坐姿滑雪测功计进行三次连续 30 秒最大努力测试,撑杆弯曲角度分别为 0°、15°、24°和 30°。分析了受试者的生物力学参数、输出功率和肌肉激活情况。结果表明,与 0°(590.65±148.95J)相比,15°(597.78±150.31J)、24°(610.94±158.96J,P=0.011)和 30°(629.10±168.78J,P<0.001)时 DP 输出功率增加。然而,有效输出功率随着弯曲角度的增加而降低。与其他外展角(0°、1.57±0.19 s、15°、1.55±0.16 s 和 30°、1.56±0.19 s)相比,24°撑杆的周期时间最短为 1.53±0.17 s。与 0°(1.02±0.14 m)相比,24°(1.07±0.12 m,P=0.029)和 30°(1.11±0.13 m,P<0.001)时的周期距离显著增加。随着撑杆弯曲角度的增加,肩肘关节运动范围和关节力矩显著增加。本研究发现,肩部外展增加了撑杆的输出功率,但降低了效率。通过分析撑杆角度和撑杆力,我们发现最佳撑杆弯曲角度可能取决于地形或滑雪速度。这些结果可能指导比赛中的竞赛技术和策略,并可能进一步影响越野坐姿滑雪运动员的力量训练计划。