Suppr超能文献

再生混凝土砖墙与掺煤矸石砌块复合墙受压承载力的对比分析

A comparative analysis of compression bearing capacity in recycled concrete brick walls and composite walls incorporating coal-ash blocks.

作者信息

Li Jianhua, Xu Xueyong, Liu Xiaoqin

机构信息

Huzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou, 313000, China.

Huzhou Key Laboratory of Green Building Technology, Huzhou, 313000, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20897. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48369-x.

Abstract

In the face of the problem of waste disposal in the demolition of concrete structures, a composite wall composed of recycled concrete bricks and fly ash blocks was proposed, and based on the previous thermal performance research, its axial compression performance were further studied. Four types of walls were designed and constructed: (1) clay brick masonry (CBM), (2) recycled concrete brick masonry (RBM), (3) bilateral clay bricks masonry with coal-ash blocks sandwich insulation wall (CFCM), and (4) bilateral recycled concrete bricks masonry with coal-ash blocks sandwich insulation wall (RFRM). The test results showed that recycled concrete brick masonry exhibited a higher bearing capacity than clay brick masonry. The ultimate load of RBM was 15% higher than that of CBM. Moreover, the ultimate load of CFCM was 21% higher than that of CBM. Following the addition of sandwich coal-ash blocks in RBM, its ultimate load increased by over 42% than that of CBM. Following the addition of coal-ash blocks sandwich in both clay and recycled concrete bricks masonry, both the bearing capacity and strain exhibited improvement, the yielding load and compressive strength of them increased. Thus, it could be concluded that coal-ash blocks improved its bearing capacity. Based on the analysis of the axial compression tests, a theoretical computational model was developed and a computational expression to explain the compressive bearing capacity of a two-sided brick with coal-ash blocks sandwich insulation wall. Comparisons between the test ultimate loads (FT) and the estimated ultimate loads (FE) confirmed the accuracy of the theoretical calculation model for the compressive bearing capacity. Thus, theoretical computational models are highly recommended for the design of two-sided bricks with insulating walls constructed from coal-ash blocks being sandwiched together. This study provides a theoretical basis for the engineering application of recycled concrete brick wall and fly ash block composite wall.

摘要

针对混凝土结构拆除中的废弃物处理问题,提出了一种由再生混凝土砖和粉煤灰砌块组成的复合墙体,并基于前期热工性能研究,进一步对其轴心受压性能展开研究。设计并建造了四种类型的墙体:(1)粘土砖砌体(CBM);(2)再生混凝土砖砌体(RBM);(3)双侧粘土砖夹粉煤灰砌块保温墙砌体(CFCM);(4)双侧再生混凝土砖夹粉煤灰砌块保温墙砌体(RFRM)。试验结果表明,再生混凝土砖砌体的承载力高于粘土砖砌体。RBM的极限荷载比CBM高15%。此外,CFCM的极限荷载比CBM高21%。在RBM中加入夹心粉煤灰砌块后,其极限荷载比CBM提高了42%以上。在粘土砖砌体和再生混凝土砖砌体中均加入粉煤灰砌块夹心后,二者的承载力和应变均有所提高,屈服荷载和抗压强度均增加。由此可以得出,粉煤灰砌块提高了其承载力。基于轴心受压试验分析,建立了理论计算模型,并给出了解释双侧砖夹粉煤灰砌块保温墙抗压承载力的计算表达式。试验极限荷载(FT)与估算极限荷载(FE)的对比验证了抗压承载力理论计算模型的准确性。因此,对于由粉煤灰砌块夹心构成的双侧保温砖墙体设计,强烈推荐使用理论计算模型。本研究为再生混凝土砖墙体和粉煤灰砌块复合墙体的工程应用提供了理论依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b680/10684658/7efd5ffd8387/41598_2023_48369_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验