Farooqui Mudassir, Divani Afshin A, Galecio-Castillo Milagros, Hassan Ameer E, Jumaa Mouhammad A, Ribo Marc, Abraham Michael, Petersen Nils, Fifi Johanna, Guerrero Waldo R, Malik Amer M, Siegler James E, Nguyen Thanh N, Sheth Sunil A, Yoo Albert J, Linares Guillermo, Janjua Nazli, Quispe-Orozco Darko, Ikram Asad, Tekle Wondewossen G, Zaidi Syed F, Zevallos Cynthia B, Rizzo Federica, Barkley Tiffany, De Leacy Reade, Khalife Jane, Abdalkader Mohamad, Salazar-Marioni Sergio, Soomro Jazba, Gordon Weston, Rodriguez-Calienes Aaron, Vivanco-Suarez Juan, Turabova Charoskhon, Mokin Maxim, Yavagal Dileep R, Ortega-Gutierrez Santiago
Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Apr;16(2):328-338. doi: 10.1007/s12975-023-01214-9. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
Risk of hemorrhage remains with antiplatelet medications required with carotid stenting during endovascular therapy (EVT) for tandem lesion (TLs). We evaluated the safety of antiplatelet regimens in EVT of TLs. This multicenter study included anterior circulation TL patients from 2015 to 2020, stratified by periprocedural EVT antiplatelet strategy: (1) no antiplatelets, (2) single oral, (3) dual oral, and (4) intravenous IV (in combination with single or dual oral). Primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes were any hemorrhage, favorable functional status (mRS 0-2) at 90 days, successful reperfusion (mTICI score ≥ 2b), in-stent thrombosis, and mortality at 90 days. Of the total 691 patients, 595 were included in the final analysis. One hundred and nineteen (20%) received no antiplatelets, 134 (22.5%) received single oral, 152 (25.5%) dual oral, and 196 (31.9%) IV combination. No significant association was found for sICH (ref: no antiplatelet: 5.7%; single:4.2%; aOR 0.64, CI 0.20-2.06, p = 0.45, dual:1.9%; aOR 0.35, CI 0.09-1.43, p = 0.15, IV combination: 6.1%; aOR 1.05, CI 0.39-2.85, p = 0.92). No association was found for parenchymal or petechial hemorrhage. Odds of successful reperfusion were significantly higher with dual oral (aOR 5.85, CI 2.12-16.14, p = 0.001) and IV combination (aOR 2.35, CI 1.07-5.18, p = 0.035) compared with no antiplatelets. Odds of excellent reperfusion (mTICI 2c/3) were significantly higher for cangrelor (aOR 4.41; CI 1.2-16.28; p = 0.026). No differences were noted for mRS 0-2 at 90 days, in-stent thrombosis, and mortality rates. Administration of dual oral and IV (in combination with single or dual oral) antiplatelets during EVT was associated with significantly increased odds of successful reperfusion without an increased rate of symptomatic hemorrhage or mortality in patients with anterior circulation TLs.
对于串联病变(TLs)进行血管内治疗(EVT)期间,在颈动脉支架置入时需要使用抗血小板药物,出血风险依然存在。我们评估了TLs的EVT中抗血小板治疗方案的安全性。这项多中心研究纳入了2015年至2020年的前循环TL患者,根据围手术期EVT抗血小板策略进行分层:(1)不使用抗血小板药物,(2)单药口服,(3)双药口服,(4)静脉注射(与单药或双药口服联合使用)。主要结局是有症状性颅内出血(sICH)。次要结局包括任何出血、90天时良好的功能状态(改良Rankin量表评分0 - 2分)、成功再灌注(脑梗死溶栓分级[mTICI]评分≥2b)、支架内血栓形成以及90天时的死亡率。在总共691例患者中,595例纳入最终分析。119例(20%)未使用抗血小板药物,134例(22.5%)单药口服,152例(25.5%)双药口服,196例(31.9%)静脉联合用药。未发现sICH有显著关联(对照:不使用抗血小板药物:5.7%;单药:4.2%;调整后比值比[aOR]0.64,置信区间[CI]0.20 - 2.06,p = 0.45;双药:1.9%;aOR 0.35,CI 0.09 - 1.43,p = 0.15;静脉联合用药:6.1%;aOR 1.05,CI 0.39 - 2.85,p = 0.92)。未发现实质或瘀点性出血有相关性。与不使用抗血小板药物相比,双药口服(aOR 5.85,CI 2.12 - 16.14,p = 0.001)和静脉联合用药(aOR 2.35,CI 1.07 - 5.18,p = 0.035)成功再灌注的几率显著更高。坎格雷洛的良好再灌注(mTICI 2c/3)几率显著更高(aOR 4.41;CI 1.2 - 16.28;p = 0.026)。90天时改良Rankin量表评分0 - 2分、支架内血栓形成及死亡率无差异。在前循环TL患者的EVT期间,双药口服和静脉注射(与单药或双药口服联合使用)抗血小板药物与成功再灌注几率显著增加相关,且未增加有症状性出血或死亡率。