Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences, C228 Pool Agricultural Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29631, USA.
Department Nutritional Sciences, University of Georgia, 206 Hoke Smith Annex, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;23(1):2359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16771-9.
In August 2021, only 47.6% of all eligible residents in South Carolina (SC) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with only 41% having completed their vaccination series. Additionally, only 27% of all Hispanics in SC had completed their vaccination series compared to 34.1% of non-Hispanics. Vaccine hesitancy is a complex phenomenon that is context and vaccine-specific. Focusing on unvaccinated Hispanics living in rural areas of SC, this study aimed to identify barriers to vaccination and provide an educational intervention designed to address vaccine hesitancy.
A complex mixed-methods evaluation design was used to conduct this study. First, in-person vaccine educational sessions were implemented, along with a pre-post-test survey, to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, motivations, barriers, and intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination. Second, in-person follow-up focus groups were held with the same participants to gather in-depth insight about participants' knowledge and attitudes about the COVID-19 vaccination. Third, an online follow-up survey was conducted to assess the effect of the training and discussion session on COVID-19 vaccination. Study outcomes were assessed among the 17 individuals who participated in the educational sessions and focus group discussions.
Findings revealed that for unvaccinated Hispanics living in South Carolina; vaccine hesitancy was primarily driven by: 1) misinformation and information coming from unverified sources and 2) negative perceptions of the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. Specifically, participants were fearful that the vaccine development was rushed and that the vaccines might contain questionable ingredients that could cause strong side effects or even death. Participants were also concerned that vaccination might cause them to get sick and be hospitalized, which would have financial implications since they could not afford healthcare or take time off work.
Program implementation and mass communication campaigns should focus on COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness, including side effects, what to expect after being vaccinated, and how to look for information from reputable sources. The educational session implemented proved to be effective and helped reduce vaccine hesitancy since most participants (80%) self-reported receiving a COVID-19 vaccine after program participation.
2021 年 8 月,南卡罗来纳州(SC)仅有 47.6%的符合条件的居民接种了至少一剂 COVID-19 疫苗,仅有 41%完成了疫苗接种系列。此外,与非西班牙裔相比,南卡罗来纳州所有西班牙裔中仅有 27%完成了疫苗接种系列。疫苗犹豫是一种复杂的现象,具有背景和疫苗特异性。本研究聚焦于居住在南卡罗来纳州农村地区的未接种西班牙裔人群,旨在确定疫苗接种的障碍,并提供旨在解决疫苗犹豫问题的教育干预措施。
采用复杂的混合方法评估设计进行本研究。首先,开展了现场疫苗教育课程,并进行了预-后测试调查,以评估知识、态度、动机、障碍和接种 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿变化。其次,与同一参与者进行了现场后续焦点小组讨论,以深入了解参与者对 COVID-19 疫苗的知识和态度。第三,进行了在线后续调查,以评估培训和讨论对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的影响。研究结果在参加教育课程和焦点小组讨论的 17 名个体中进行了评估。
研究结果表明,对于居住在南卡罗来纳州的未接种西班牙裔人群;疫苗犹豫主要由以下因素驱动:1)来自未经证实的来源的错误信息和信息;2)对 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性和有效性的负面看法。具体而言,参与者担心疫苗开发过于仓促,疫苗可能含有可疑成分,可能会引起强烈的副作用甚至死亡。参与者还担心接种疫苗会使他们生病并住院,这将对他们造成经济影响,因为他们无法负担医疗保健费用或请假。
项目实施和大众传播活动应侧重于 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性和有效性,包括副作用、接种疫苗后的预期、以及如何从可靠来源获取信息。实施的教育课程被证明是有效的,因为大多数参与者(80%)在参与项目后自我报告接种了 COVID-19 疫苗,从而帮助减少了疫苗犹豫。