Bienz Stefan P, Gadzo Naida, Zuercher Anina N, Wiedemeier Daniel, Jung Ronald E, Thoma Daniel S
Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Clin Periodontol. 2024 Mar;51(3):319-329. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13903. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
To evaluate the progression of wound healing of standardized palatal defects in groups using three different collagen-based wound dressings and a control group, in terms of wound closure, pain perception and descriptive histology.
Twenty participants were enrolled in this experimental study, in whom four palatal defects were created. The defects (6 mm diameter, 3 mm depth) were randomly assigned to one of four treatment modalities: C (control), MG (Mucograft®), MD (mucoderm®) and FG (Fibro-Gide®). Photographs were taken, and pain assessment was performed before and after treatment and at 5, 7, 9, 12, 14 and 16 days after surgery. All participants wore a palatal splint for a duration of 16 days.
All groups achieved complete wound closure at 14 days. The percentage of the remaining open wound on day 7 amounted to 49.3% (C; interquartile range [IQR]: 22.6), 70.1% (FG; IQR: 20.7), 56.8% (MD; IQR: 26.3) and 62.2% (MG; IQR: 34.4). Statistically significant differences were found between FG and C (p =.01) and between MD and FG (p =.04). None of the participants rated pain higher than 4 out of 10 during the entire study period.
Collagen-based wound dressings provide coverage of open defects, albeit without acceleration of wound closure or reduction of pain. FG (which is not intended for open oral wounds) showed slower wound closure compared to C and MD.
使用三种不同的基于胶原蛋白的伤口敷料及一个对照组,从伤口闭合、疼痛感知和描述性组织学方面评估各实验组标准化腭部缺损的伤口愈合进程。
20名参与者纳入本实验研究,在其腭部制造4处缺损。这些缺损(直径6毫米,深3毫米)被随机分配至四种治疗方式之一:C组(对照组)、MG组(Mucograft®)、MD组(mucoderm®)和FG组(Fibro-Gide®)。在治疗前、治疗后以及术后第5、7、9、12、14和16天拍照并进行疼痛评估。所有参与者佩戴腭护板16天。
所有组均在14天实现完全伤口闭合。第7天剩余开放伤口的百分比在C组为49.3%(四分位间距[IQR]:22.6),FG组为70.1%(IQR:20.7),MD组为56.8%(IQR:26.3),MG组为62.2%(IQR:34.4)。FG组与C组之间(p = 0.01)以及MD组与FG组之间(p = 0.04)存在统计学显著差异。在整个研究期间,没有参与者将疼痛评为高于10分制的4分。
基于胶原蛋白的伤口敷料可覆盖开放性缺损,尽管并未加速伤口闭合或减轻疼痛。与C组和MD组相比,FG组(不适用于开放性口腔伤口)伤口闭合较慢。