• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃塞俄比亚中部高地不同集约化程度梯度下小农户奶牛养殖系统的肠道甲烷排放因子

Enteric methane emission factors of smallholder dairy farming systems across intensification gradients in the central highlands of Ethiopia.

作者信息

Feyissa Abraham Abera, Senbeta Feyera, Tolera Adugna, Diriba Dawit, Boonyanuwat Kalaya

机构信息

College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Selale University, Fitche, Ethiopia.

College of Development Studies, Center for Environment and Development, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Carbon Balance Manag. 2023 Nov 29;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00242-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13021-023-00242-0
PMID:38019331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10688001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following global pledges to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 30% by 2030 compared to the baseline level of 2020, improved quantification of GHG emissions from developing countries has become crucial. However, national GHG inventories in most Sub-Saharan African countries use default (Tier I) emission factors (EF) generated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to estimate enteric CH emissions from animal agriculture. The present study provides an improved enteric CH emission estimate (Tier II) based on animal energy requirements derived from animal characteristics and performance data collected from about 2500 cattle in 480 households from three smallholder farming systems to represent the common dairy farming in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Using average seasonal feed digestibility data, we estimated daily methane production by class of animal and farming system and subsequently generated improved EF.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that the estimated average EF and emission intensities (EI) vary significantly across farming systems. The estimated value of EF for adult dairy cows was 73, 69, and 34 kg CH/cow/year for urban, peri-urban, and rural farming systems, respectively. Rural dairy farming had significantly higher emission intensity (EI) estimated at 1.78 CO-eq per kg of fat protein-corrected milk (FPCM) than peri-urban and urban 0.71 and 0.64 CO-eq kg FPCM dairy farming systems, respectively. The EF estimates in this study are lower than the IPCC's (2019) default value for both stall-fed high-productive and dual-purpose low-productive cows.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings can be used as a baseline for the national emission inventory, which can be used to quantify the effects of future interventions, potentially improving the country's commitment to reducing GHG emissions. Similarly, this study suggests that increased animal productivity through improved feed has a considerable mitigation potential for reducing enteric methane emissions in smallholder dairy farming systems in the study area.

摘要

背景

在全球承诺到2030年将温室气体(GHG)排放量在2020年基线水平基础上减少30%之后,改进对发展中国家温室气体排放的量化变得至关重要。然而,大多数撒哈拉以南非洲国家的国家温室气体清单使用政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)生成的默认(一级)排放因子(EF)来估算畜牧业的肠道CH排放。本研究基于动物能量需求提供了一种改进的肠道CH排放估算(二级),该能量需求源自从埃塞俄比亚中部高地三个小农养殖系统的480户家庭中约2500头牛收集的动物特征和生产性能数据,以代表常见的奶牛养殖情况。利用平均季节性饲料消化率数据,我们按动物类别和养殖系统估算了每日甲烷产量,随后生成了改进的排放因子。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,估算的平均排放因子和排放强度(EI)在不同养殖系统之间存在显著差异。城市、城郊和农村养殖系统中成年奶牛的排放因子估算值分别为73、69和34千克CH/头/年。农村奶牛养殖的排放强度(EI)显著高于城郊和城市养殖系统,分别估计为每千克脂肪蛋白校正乳(FPCM)1.78千克CO2当量,而城郊和城市养殖系统分别为0.71和0.64千克CO2当量/千克FPCM。本研究中的排放因子估算值低于IPCC(2019年)对舍饲高产奶牛和兼用型低产奶牛的默认值。

结论

当前研究结果可作为国家排放清单的基线,可用于量化未来干预措施的效果,有可能提升该国对减少温室气体排放的承诺。同样,本研究表明,通过改善饲料提高动物生产力在研究区域的小农奶牛养殖系统中具有相当大的减少肠道甲烷排放的缓解潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e95/10688001/76708b5bf805/13021_2023_242_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e95/10688001/76708b5bf805/13021_2023_242_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e95/10688001/76708b5bf805/13021_2023_242_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enteric methane emission factors of smallholder dairy farming systems across intensification gradients in the central highlands of Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚中部高地不同集约化程度梯度下小农户奶牛养殖系统的肠道甲烷排放因子
Carbon Balance Manag. 2023 Nov 29;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00242-0.
2
Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia.理解埃塞俄比亚中高原小农户奶牛场碳足迹的变异性。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Dec 2;54(6):411. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03379-1.
3
Assessment of carbon footprint of milk production and identification of its major determinants in smallholder dairy farms in Karnataka, India.评估印度卡纳塔克邦小农牛奶生产的碳足迹,并确定其主要决定因素。
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Dec;106(12):8847-8860. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22153. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Accuracy of enteric methane emission models for cattle in sub-Saharan Africa: status quo and the way forward.撒哈拉以南非洲反刍动物肠道甲烷排放模型的准确性:现状和未来方向。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad397.
5
Greenhouse gases inventory and carbon balance of two dairy systems obtained from two methane-estimation methods.两种甲烷估算方法获得的两个奶牛系统的温室气体清单和碳平衡。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 15;571:744-54. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.046. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
6
Enteric methane emissions by lactating and dry cows in the high Andes of Peru.秘鲁安第斯高地泌乳牛和干奶牛的肠道甲烷排放。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Mar 26;54(2):144. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03146-2.
7
Herd-level versus animal-level variation in methane emission prediction in grazing dairy cattle.放牧奶牛甲烷排放预测中的 herd-level 与 animal-level 变异性。
Animal. 2021 Sep;15(9):100325. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100325. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
8
Applying a mechanistic fermentation and digestion model for dairy cows with emission and nutrient cycling inventory and accounting methodology.应用具有排放和养分循环核算方法的奶牛机械发酵和消化模型。
Animal. 2020 Aug;14(S2):s406-s416. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120001482. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
9
Impact of nitrate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on the carbon footprints of milk from cattle produced in confined-feeding systems across regions in the United States: A life cycle analysis.硝酸盐和3-硝基氧丙醇对美国不同地区集约化饲养系统中奶牛所产牛奶碳足迹的影响:生命周期分析。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jun;105(6):5074-5083. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20988. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
10
Farm-level emission intensities of smallholder cattle (Bos indicus; B. indicus-B. taurus crosses) production systems in highlands and semi-arid regions.小农户肉牛(印度野牛;印度野牛-瘤牛杂交牛)生产系统在高地和半干旱地区的农场层面排放强度。
Animal. 2022 Jan;16(1):100445. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100445. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia.理解埃塞俄比亚中高原小农户奶牛场碳足迹的变异性。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Dec 2;54(6):411. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03379-1.
2
Estimation of enteric methane emission factors for Ndama cattle in the Sudanian zone of Senegal.塞内加尔苏丹地区 Ndama 牛肠道甲烷排放系数的估算。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020 Nov;52(6):2883-2895. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02280-z. Epub 2020 May 23.
3
Development of methane emission factors for enteric fermentation in cattle from Benin using IPCC Tier 2 methodology.
采用政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)二级方法制定贝宁牛肠道发酵甲烷排放因子。
Animal. 2015 Mar;9(3):526-33. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002626. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
4
Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems.全球牲畜系统的生物质利用、生产、饲料效率和温室气体排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20888-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308149110.
5
Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach.提高奶牛产奶量是否会减少温室气体排放?一种系统方法。
Animal. 2012 Jan;6(1):154-66. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001467.
6
The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.乳制品生产系统的碳足迹通过部分生命周期评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1266-82. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162.
7
Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants.影响反刍动物甲烷生成和减排的因素。
Anim Sci J. 2010 Feb;81(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x.
8
Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk.牛奶能量值的预测
J Dairy Sci. 1965 Sep;48(9):1215-23. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(65)88430-2.