• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳制品生产系统的碳足迹通过部分生命周期评估。

The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.

机构信息

USDA/Agricultural Research Service, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1266-82. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2009-2162
PMID:20172247
Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their potential effect on the environment has become an important national and international issue. Dairy production, along with all other types of animal agriculture, is a recognized source of GHG emissions, but little information exists on the net emissions from dairy farms. Component models for predicting all important sources and sinks of CH(4), N(2)O, and CO(2) from primary and secondary sources in dairy production were integrated in a software tool called the Dairy Greenhouse Gas model, or DairyGHG. This tool calculates the carbon footprint of a dairy production system as the net exchange of all GHG in CO(2) equivalent units per unit of energy-corrected milk produced. Primary emission sources include enteric fermentation, manure, cropland used in feed production, and the combustion of fuel in machinery used to produce feed and handle manure. Secondary emissions are those occurring during the production of resources used on the farm, which can include fuel, electricity, machinery, fertilizer, pesticides, plastic, and purchased replacement animals. A long-term C balance is assumed for the production system, which does not account for potential depletion or sequestration of soil carbon. An evaluation of dairy farms of various sizes and production strategies gave carbon footprints of 0.37 to 0.69kg of CO(2) equivalent units/kg of energy-corrected milk, depending upon milk production level and the feeding and manure handling strategies used. In a comparison with previous studies, DairyGHG predicted C footprints similar to those reported when similar assumptions were made for feeding strategy, milk production, allocation method between milk and animal coproducts, and sources of CO(2) and secondary emissions. DairyGHG provides a relatively simple tool for evaluating management effects on net GHG emissions and the overall carbon footprint of dairy production systems.

摘要

温室气体(GHG)排放及其对环境的潜在影响已成为一个重要的国家和国际问题。乳制品生产与所有其他类型的动物农业一样,是温室气体排放的公认来源,但关于奶牛场的净排放量的信息却很少。用于预测乳制品生产中初级和次级源中 CH(4)、N(2)O 和 CO(2)所有重要来源和汇的组件模型已集成到称为 Dairy Greenhouse Gas model 或 DairyGHG 的软件工具中。该工具根据生产系统中所有 GHG 以 CO(2)当量单位计算奶牛生产系统的碳足迹,每单位能量校正奶的净交换量。主要排放源包括反刍发酵、粪便、用于饲料生产的耕地以及用于生产饲料和处理粪便的机械中燃料的燃烧。二次排放是在农场使用的资源生产过程中发生的排放,其中可能包括燃料、电力、用于生产饲料和处理粪便的机械、肥料、农药、塑料和购买的替代动物。假定生产系统具有长期的 C 平衡,不考虑土壤碳的潜在消耗或封存。对各种规模和生产策略的奶牛场进行评估后,其碳足迹为 0.37 至 0.69kg CO(2)当量单位 /kg 能量校正奶,具体取决于牛奶产量水平和使用的喂养和粪便处理策略。与以前的研究进行比较时,DairyGHG 预测的 C 足迹与在相似的喂养策略、牛奶产量、牛奶和动物副产物之间的分配方法以及 CO(2)和二次排放源假设下报告的那些相似。DairyGHG 为评估管理对净 GHG 排放和奶牛生产系统整体碳足迹的影响提供了一个相对简单的工具。

相似文献

1
The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.乳制品生产系统的碳足迹通过部分生命周期评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1266-82. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162.
2
Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.加利福尼亚州牛肉生产系统的碳足迹和氨排放。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4641-55. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4653. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
3
Feeding strategies and manure management for cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms in Wisconsin.威斯康星州奶牛场温室气体排放成本效益缓解的饲养策略与粪便管理
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5904-17. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8082. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
4
Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of a large-scale vertically integrated organic dairy in the United States.美国大规模垂直整合有机奶牛场的生命周期能源和温室气体分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Mar 1;45(5):1903-10. doi: 10.1021/es102794m. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
5
Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.通过粪污厌氧消化缓解牛奶生产的环境影响:以波河谷的一个奶牛场为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 May 15;481:196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
6
Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in Eastern Canada: a case study.加拿大东部地区乳制品生产温室气体排放的生命周期评估:案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5164-5175. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5229.
7
A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.高产封闭式奶牛场和草地奶牛场牛奶碳足迹的案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1835-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
8
Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach.提高奶牛产奶量是否会减少温室气体排放?一种系统方法。
Animal. 2012 Jan;6(1):154-66. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001467.
9
Assessment of carbon footprint of milk production and identification of its major determinants in smallholder dairy farms in Karnataka, India.评估印度卡纳塔克邦小农牛奶生产的碳足迹,并确定其主要决定因素。
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Dec;106(12):8847-8860. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22153. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Grazing management contributions to net global warming potential: a long-term evaluation in the Northern Great Plains.放牧管理对净全球变暖潜势的贡献:大平原北部的长期评估。
J Environ Qual. 2010 Apr 13;39(3):799-809. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0272. Print 2010 May-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Enteric methane emission factors of smallholder dairy farming systems across intensification gradients in the central highlands of Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚中部高地不同集约化程度梯度下小农户奶牛养殖系统的肠道甲烷排放因子
Carbon Balance Manag. 2023 Nov 29;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00242-0.
2
Increasing farm size is an effective way to decrease the carbon footprint in dairy cattle production.增加农场规模是减少奶牛养殖碳足迹的有效途径。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Nov 27;55(6):421. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03837-4.
3
Informal waste pickers in guayaquil: Recycling rates, environmental benefits, main barriers, and troubles.
瓜亚基尔的非正式拾荒者:回收率、环境效益、主要障碍及问题
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 3;9(9):e19775. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19775. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Impact of smallholder cattle farms on the environment: a study.小农牛场对环境的影响:一项研究。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Jun 12;55(4):236. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03652-x.
5
Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Technological, Nutritional, Environmental, Market, and Social Challenges and Opportunities.植物基肉类替代品:技术、营养、环境、市场和社会挑战与机遇。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 15;15(2):452. doi: 10.3390/nu15020452.
6
The cost and profitability analysis of different dairy farm sizes.不同规模奶牛场的成本和盈利分析。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Sep 24;54(5):320. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03321-5.
7
Relationship between tourism number and air quality by carbon footprint measurement: a case study of Jiuzhaigou Scenic Area.基于碳足迹测量的旅游人数与空气质量关系:以九寨沟景区为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):20894-20902. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12068-1. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Carbon Footprint Assessment of Spanish Dairy Cattle Farms: Effectiveness of Dietary and Farm Management Practices as a Mitigation Strategy.西班牙奶牛场的碳足迹评估:日粮和农场管理措施作为缓解策略的有效性
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 10;10(11):2083. doi: 10.3390/ani10112083.
9
Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through different dairy cattle systems in subtropical regions.通过不同的亚热带奶牛养殖系统减少温室气体排放的潜力。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 18;15(6):e0234687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234687. eCollection 2020.
10
Dynamic analysis of agricultural carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese provinces along the Belt and Road.沿“一带一路”中国省份农业碳排放效率的动态分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 7;15(2):e0228223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228223. eCollection 2020.