Fesce Riccardo, Gatti Roberto
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Front Netw Physiol. 2023 Nov 1;3:1294866. doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2023.1294866. eCollection 2023.
The brain cannot stop elaborating information. While the circuitries implied in processing sensory information, and those involved in programming and producing movements, have been extensively studied and characterized, what circuits elicit and sustain the endogenous activity (which might be referred to as imaginative activity) has not been clarified to a similar extent. The two areas which have been investigated most intensely are visual and motor imagery. Visual imagery mostly involves the same areas as visual processing and has been studied by having the subject face specific visual imagery tasks that are related to the use of the visual sketchpad as a component of the working memory system. Much less is known about spontaneous, free visual imagination, what circuits drive it, how and why. Motor imagery has been studied with several approaches: the neural circuits activated in the brain during performance of a movement have been compared with those involved in visually or kinaesthetically imagining performing the same movement, or in observing another person performing it. Some networks are similarly activated in these situations, although primary motor neurons are only activated during motor execution. Imagining the execution of an action seems unable to activate circuits involved in eliciting accompanying motor adjustments (such as postural adaptations) that are unconsciously (implicitly) associated to the execution of the movement. A more faithful neuronal activation is obtained through kinaesthetic motor imagination-imagining how it feels to perform the movement. Activation of sensory-motor and mirror systems, elicited by observing another person performing a transitive action, can also recruit circuits that sustain implicit motor responses that normally accompany the overt movement. This last aspect has originated the expanding and promising field of action observation therapy (AOT). The fact that the various kinds of motor imagery differentially involve the various brain networks may offer some hints on what neural networks sustain imagery in general, another activity that has an attentive component-recalling a memory, covertly rehearsing a speech, internally replaying a behaviour-and a vague, implicit component that arises from the freely flowing surfacing of internal images, not driven by intentional, conscious control.
大脑无法停止对信息的加工。虽然处理感觉信息以及参与动作编程和产生的神经回路已得到广泛研究和表征,但引发和维持内源性活动(可称为想象活动)的神经回路在同等程度上尚未得到阐明。研究最为深入的两个领域是视觉意象和运动意象。视觉意象大多涉及与视觉加工相同的区域,并且通过让受试者面对特定的视觉意象任务来进行研究,这些任务与将视觉画板用作工作记忆系统的一个组成部分相关。对于自发的、自由的视觉想象,驱动它的神经回路、方式及原因,我们所知甚少。运动意象已通过多种方法进行研究:在执行动作时大脑中激活的神经回路已与在视觉上或动觉上想象执行相同动作或观察他人执行该动作时所涉及的神经回路进行了比较。在这些情况下,一些神经网络会被类似地激活,尽管初级运动神经元仅在运动执行期间被激活。想象动作的执行似乎无法激活引发伴随运动调整(如姿势适应)的神经回路,这些调整与动作执行无意识地(隐含地)相关联。通过动觉运动想象——想象执行动作时的感觉——可获得更真实的神经元激活。观察他人执行传递性动作所引发的感觉运动和镜像系统的激活,也可募集维持通常伴随明显动作的隐含运动反应的神经回路。这最后一个方面催生了不断发展且前景广阔的动作观察疗法(AOT)领域。各种运动意象以不同方式涉及不同脑网络这一事实,可能为哪些神经网络一般维持意象提供一些线索,意象是另一种具有注意力成分——回忆记忆、暗中排练言语、在内心重演行为——以及由内部图像自由流动浮现产生的模糊、隐含成分的活动,这种浮现并非由有意的、有意识的控制驱动。