• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解方法的验证研究。

A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief.

作者信息

Ventafridda V, Tamburini M, Caraceni A, De Conno F, Naldi F

出版信息

Cancer. 1987 Feb 15;59(4):850-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1
PMID:3802043
Abstract

The method for cancer pain relief proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) consists of guidelines for a three-step treatment, from non-opioids to weak and then strong opioids, according to need. Adjuvant drugs can be added to each step. This report presents the 2-year experience of the WHO Collaborating Centre at the National Cancer Institute of Milan in the use of this method. This retrospective study shows that a correct use of the analgesic ladder can reduce pain to a third of its initial intensity. The use of non-opioids had an average duration of 19.2 days; in 52% of the cases treatment was discontinued due to inefficacy and in 42%, to side effects. Weak opioids were administered on an average for 28.0 days. A shift to Strong opioids was made in 92% of the cases due to inefficacy and in 8% because of side effects. Treatment with strong opioids lasted for an average of 46.6 days and can be considered the mainstay of cancer pain therapy. Performance status was not altered considerably during the study and hours of sleep were doubled. The analgesic ladder proved efficacious in 71% of the cases. Neurolytic procedures had to be used in 29%. The authors conclude that analgesics, as proposed by WHO, are the most suitable treatment arm in controlling pain in palliative treatment for advanced cancer patients. Lack of availability or underuse of opioids constitute the real obstacle to the application of this method.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)提出的癌症疼痛缓解方法包括三步治疗指南,即根据需要从非阿片类药物过渡到弱阿片类药物,再到强阿片类药物。每一步均可添加辅助药物。本报告介绍了米兰国立癌症研究所WHO合作中心使用该方法的两年经验。这项回顾性研究表明,正确使用止痛阶梯可将疼痛减轻至初始强度的三分之一。非阿片类药物的平均使用时长为19.2天;52%的病例因无效而停药,42%因副作用停药。弱阿片类药物的平均使用时长为28.0天。92%的病例因无效而改用强阿片类药物,8%因副作用改用。强阿片类药物的治疗平均持续46.6天,可被视为癌症疼痛治疗的主要手段。研究期间患者的身体状况没有明显改变,睡眠时间增加了一倍。止痛阶梯在71%的病例中证明有效。29%的病例必须采用神经溶解术。作者得出结论,WHO提议的镇痛药是晚期癌症患者姑息治疗中控制疼痛最合适的治疗手段。阿片类药物供应不足或使用不足是应用该方法的真正障碍。

相似文献

1
A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief.世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解方法的验证研究。
Cancer. 1987 Feb 15;59(4):850-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1.
2
WHO guidelines for the use of analgesics in cancer pain.世界卫生组织癌症疼痛镇痛药物使用指南。
Int J Tissue React. 1985;7(1):93-6.
3
4
Use of strong opioids in advanced cancer pain: a randomized trial.强效阿片类药物在晚期癌痛中的应用:一项随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 May;27(5):409-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.10.006.
5
Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study.世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解指南的验证:一项为期10年的前瞻性研究。
Pain. 1995 Oct;63(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00017-M.
6
Pain treatment and outcomes for patients with advanced cancer who receive follow-up care at home.接受居家后续护理的晚期癌症患者的疼痛治疗及治疗效果。
Cancer. 1999 Apr 15;85(8):1849-58. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990415)85:8<1849::aid-cncr27>3.0.co;2-6.
7
Opioid and adjuvant analgesics: compared and contrasted.阿片类和辅助镇痛药:比较与对比
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Aug;28(5):378-83. doi: 10.1177/1049909111410298. Epub 2011 May 26.
8
[Opioids for cancer pain treatment. Efficacy and side effects].[用于癌症疼痛治疗的阿片类药物。疗效与副作用]
Schmerz. 2005 Oct;19(5):395-400, 402-3. doi: 10.1007/s00482-005-0425-8.
9
Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief during the last days and hours of life.世界卫生组织癌症临终疼痛缓解指南的验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991 Oct;6(7):411-22. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90039-7.
10
Misappropriation of the 1986 WHO analgesic ladder: the pitfalls of labelling opioids as weak or strong.滥用 1986 年世卫组织阿片类药物镇痛阶梯:将阿片类药物标记为弱或强的陷阱。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;129(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of oral morphine versus oral tramadol on early pain control in opioid-naive patients with moderate cancer pain.口服吗啡与口服曲马多对中度癌痛初治患者早期疼痛控制效果的比较。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 Mar 5;19:1864. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1864. eCollection 2025.
2
Management of pain in cancer patients - an update.癌症患者疼痛的管理——最新进展
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Dec 12;18:1821. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1821. eCollection 2024.
3
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) cardiac turnkey order set for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery: Proceedings from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) ERAS Conclave 2023.
心脏手术围手术期疼痛管理的加速康复外科(ERAS)心脏一站式医嘱集:美国胸外科协会(AATS)2023年ERAS研讨会会议记录
JTCVS Open. 2024 Sep 6;22:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.08.018. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Pharmacological Pain Treatment in Older Persons.老年人的药物性疼痛治疗
Drugs Aging. 2024 Dec;41(12):959-976. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01151-8. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
5
Rehabilitation for Functioning and Quality of Life in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Scoping Review.恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者功能和生活质量的康复:范围综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jul 30;31(8):4318-4337. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31080322.
6
Temporal characterization of acute pain and toxicity kinetics during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. A retrospective study.头颈部癌放射治疗期间急性疼痛的时间特征及毒性动力学。一项回顾性研究。
Oral Oncol Rep. 2023 Sep;7. doi: 10.1016/j.oor.2023.100092. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Education in Patients with Cancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症疼痛患者的治疗性教育效果:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;15(16):4123. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164123.
8
Impact of Anxiety During Hospitalization on the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture.住院期间焦虑情绪对骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体骨折患者临床结局的影响
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):417-424. doi: 10.1177/21925682231192847. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
9
Characterization and Risk Assessment of PM-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and their Derivatives Emitted from a Typical Pesticide Factory in China.中国一家典型农药厂排放的与颗粒物结合的多环芳烃及其衍生物的特征分析与风险评估
Toxics. 2023 Jul 23;11(7):637. doi: 10.3390/toxics11070637.
10
[Drug therapy for cancer-related pain-evidence regarding hydromorphone, oxycodone, and methadone : Presentation and summary of three Cochrane reviews].[癌症相关疼痛的药物治疗——关于氢吗啡酮、羟考酮和美沙酮的证据:三项Cochrane系统评价的介绍与总结]
Urologie. 2023 Jun;62(6):622-627. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02100-w. Epub 2023 May 30.