• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织癌症临终疼痛缓解指南的验证

Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief during the last days and hours of life.

作者信息

Grond S, Zech D, Schug S A, Lynch J, Lehmann K A

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991 Oct;6(7):411-22. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90039-7.

DOI:10.1016/0885-3924(91)90039-7
PMID:1940485
Abstract

The efficacy of the World Health Organization's guidelines for cancer pain relief was examined in 401 dying patients. At the time of death, only 3% of the patients experienced severe or very severe pain; whereas 52% had no pain at all, 24% experienced only mild or moderate pain, and 20% were unable to rate their pain intensity. Analgesic drugs were the mainstay of therapy during the last 24 hr of life, being administered by mouth in 47% and parenterally in 44% of the patients. Only 9% of the patients required no systemic analgesics. Nonopioid analgesics alone were effective in 5% and a combination of nonopioids and "weak" opioids were effective in 16% of the patients. In the remaining 70% of the patients "strong" opioids alone or in combination with nonopioid analgesics were necessary to achieve adequate pain reduction. Additional adjuvant drugs to treat special types of pain or other symptoms were prescribed in 90% of the patients. Nonpharmacological measures, such as radiotherapy, nerve blocks or neurosurgery played only a very minor role at this stage of the disease. This study shows that cancer pain can be treated satisfactorily until death.

摘要

对401例临终患者研究了世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解指南的疗效。在死亡时,仅3%的患者经历重度或极重度疼痛;而52%的患者完全没有疼痛,24%的患者仅经历轻度或中度疼痛,20%的患者无法评定其疼痛强度。镇痛药是临终前24小时治疗的主要手段,47%的患者口服给药,44%的患者经肠外给药。仅9%的患者不需要全身性镇痛药。仅非阿片类镇痛药有效的患者占5%,非阿片类药与“弱”阿片类药联合有效的患者占16%。在其余70%的患者中,单独使用“强”阿片类药或与非阿片类镇痛药联合使用对于充分减轻疼痛是必要的。90%的患者还开具了用于治疗特殊类型疼痛或其他症状的辅助药物。在疾病的这个阶段,放疗、神经阻滞或神经外科手术等非药物措施仅起非常小的作用。这项研究表明,癌症疼痛直至死亡前都可得到满意治疗。

相似文献

1
Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief during the last days and hours of life.世界卫生组织癌症临终疼痛缓解指南的验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991 Oct;6(7):411-22. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90039-7.
2
Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study.世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解指南的验证:一项为期10年的前瞻性研究。
Pain. 1995 Oct;63(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00017-M.
3
Use of strong opioids in advanced cancer pain: a randomized trial.强效阿片类药物在晚期癌痛中的应用:一项随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 May;27(5):409-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.10.006.
4
Pain treatment and outcomes for patients with advanced cancer who receive follow-up care at home.接受居家后续护理的晚期癌症患者的疼痛治疗及治疗效果。
Cancer. 1999 Apr 15;85(8):1849-58. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990415)85:8<1849::aid-cncr27>3.0.co;2-6.
5
6
Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for pain relief in head and neck cancer. A prospective study.世界卫生组织头颈部癌疼痛缓解指南的验证:一项前瞻性研究
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993 May;102(5):342-8. doi: 10.1177/000348949310200504.
7
The importance of non-opioid analgesics for cancer pain relief according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization.根据世界卫生组织的指南,非阿片类镇痛药在缓解癌痛方面的重要性。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1991;11(6):253-60.
8
A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief.世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解方法的验证研究。
Cancer. 1987 Feb 15;59(4):850-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1.
9
[Pain relief in the final stage of cancer.].[癌症终末期的疼痛缓解。]
Schmerz. 1990 Mar;4(1):22-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02527826.
10
[Cancer pain management].[癌症疼痛管理]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1989 Apr;16(4 Pt 2-1):1031-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Availability of, Barriers to Performing, and Educational Practices of Interventional Procedures for Refractory Pain in Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Survey of Designated Cancer Hospitals in Japan.日本指定癌症医院针对癌症患者难治性疼痛的介入治疗的可及性、实施障碍及教育实践:一项全国性调查
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Dec 9;5(1):543-552. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0028. eCollection 2024.
2
Intrathecal drug delivery for the management of pain and spasticity in adults: British Pain Society's recommendations for best clinical practice.鞘内给药用于成人疼痛和痉挛的管理:英国疼痛学会最佳临床实践建议
Br J Pain. 2024 Sep 7:20494637241280356. doi: 10.1177/20494637241280356.
3
Advancing Postoperative Pain Management in Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.
口腔癌患者术后疼痛管理的进展:一项系统评价
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;17(4):542. doi: 10.3390/ph17040542.
4
Availability of and factors related to interventional procedures for refractory pain in patients with cancer: a nationwide survey.癌症难治性疼痛患者介入治疗的可及性及其相关因素:一项全国性调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 26;21(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01056-6.
5
The use of fentanyl in pain management in head and neck cancer patients: a narrative review.芬太尼在头颈部癌症患者疼痛管理中的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Br J Pain. 2018 Aug;12(3):155-162. doi: 10.1177/2049463717736787. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
The Rotterdam Elderly Pain Observation Scale (REPOS) is reliable and valid for non-communicative end-of-life patients.鹿特丹老年疼痛观察量表(REPOS)在非沟通的临终患者中具有可靠性和有效性。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 21;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0280-x.
7
Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review.世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解指南的有效性:一项综合综述。
J Pain Res. 2016 Jul 22;9:515-34. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S97759. eCollection 2016.
8
A personalized approach to assessing and managing pain in patients with cancer.一种针对癌症患者疼痛评估与管理的个性化方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 1;32(16):1640-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2508. Epub 2014 May 5.
9
Management of chronic pain in elderly, frail patients: finding a suitable, personalized method of control.老年体弱患者慢性疼痛的管理:寻找合适的、个性化的控制方法。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:37-46. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S30165. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
10
Management of pain in the elderly at the end of life.终末期老年患者的疼痛管理。
Drugs Aging. 2012 Apr 1;29(4):285-305. doi: 10.2165/11599210-000000000-00000.