• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗 80 岁以上与 80 岁以下肝细胞癌患者的安全性和有效性。

Safety and Effectiveness of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Aged Greater versus Less Than 80 Years.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging of Hubei Province, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Nov 14;18:1883-1892. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S429259. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/CIA.S429259
PMID:38020452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10656852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Population aging has emerged as a pressing global concern and a significant medical challenge. The use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been extensively employed for managing unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of TACE specifically in individuals aged 80 years and above.

AIM

To examine the safety and effectiveness of TACE in elderly patients (≥ 80 years) compared to younger patients (< 80 years) with HCC, and the potential risk factors that may impact the progression-free survival (PFS) for TACE were also identified.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a consecutive cohort of unresectable HCC patients who were initially treated with TACE. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the age at which they underwent TACE, and the efficacy and safety of the treatment were evaluated. The PFS was investigated, and the prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients were included in this study, with 44 patients aged 80 years or older and 154 patients younger than 80 years. The cumulative risk of PFS after TACE was similar between the two groups ( = 0.800). In the multivariate analysis, a lower ECOG score ( = 0.039) and an earlier BCLC stage ( = 0.004) were identified as independent predictors of better PFS. Patients in both groups tolerated the TACE treatment well.

CONCLUSION

The impact of aging on poor PFS is not significant. In patients with HCC, TACE therapy is both safe and effective for octogenarians, similar to younger patients. Furthermore, the better PFS is associated with a low ECOG score and an early BCLC stage.

摘要

背景

人口老龄化已成为全球关注的紧迫问题和重大医学挑战。经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)已广泛用于治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)。然而,关于 TACE 在 80 岁及以上人群中的安全性和有效性的证据有限。

目的

研究 TACE 在年龄≥80 岁的老年 HCC 患者与年龄<80 岁的年轻 HCC 患者中的安全性和有效性,并确定可能影响 TACE 无进展生存期(PFS)的潜在危险因素。

方法

对接受 TACE 初始治疗的不可切除 HCC 患者连续队列进行回顾性分析。根据接受 TACE 的年龄将患者分为两组,并评估治疗的疗效和安全性。研究 PFS,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险模型分析预后因素。

结果

本研究共纳入 198 例患者,其中 44 例年龄≥80 岁,154 例年龄<80 岁。两组患者 TACE 后 PFS 的累积风险相似(=0.800)。多因素分析显示,ECOG 评分较低(=0.039)和 BCLC 分期较早(=0.004)是 PFS 较好的独立预测因素。两组患者均能耐受 TACE 治疗。

结论

年龄对较差 PFS 的影响不显著。对于 HCC 患者,TACE 治疗对 80 岁以上患者和年轻患者同样安全有效。此外,更好的 PFS 与较低的 ECOG 评分和较早的 BCLC 分期相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1214/10656852/764f90f77109/CIA-18-1883-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1214/10656852/764f90f77109/CIA-18-1883-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1214/10656852/764f90f77109/CIA-18-1883-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Aged Greater versus Less Than 80 Years.经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗 80 岁以上与 80 岁以下肝细胞癌患者的安全性和有效性。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Nov 14;18:1883-1892. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S429259. eCollection 2023.
2
Improved clinical outcome using transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation for patients in Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage A or B hepatocellular carcinoma regardless of tumor size: results of a single-center retrospective case control study.经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期 A 或 B 期肝细胞癌患者的临床结局改善,无论肿瘤大小:单中心回顾性病例对照研究结果。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):983. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6237-5.
3
Comparison of transarterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation for unresectable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching.经动脉化疗栓塞术与射频消融术治疗不可切除的巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期0/A期肝细胞癌的比较:倾向评分匹配法
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;31(2):442-9. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13077.
4
Microvascular Invasion as a Predictor of Response to Treatment with Sorafenib and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Recurrent Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.微血管侵犯作为索拉非尼联合经肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗复发性中期肝细胞癌疗效预测因子的研究
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):237-247. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181818. Epub 2019 May 28.
5
Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.对比中期肝细胞癌手术切除与肝动脉化疗栓塞联合或不联合射频消融的总生存率:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01235-w.
6
Thermal Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy After Transarterial Chemoembolization for Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗后无法手术的肝细胞癌行热消融与立体定向体部放疗的疗效比较:倾向评分加权分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Sep;217(3):691-698. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24117. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Safety and Prognosis of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Octogenarians with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.高龄原发性肝癌患者经肝动脉化疗栓塞术的安全性及预后分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):1413-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02290-x. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
8
Comparison of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.肝切除术与经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗孤立性肝细胞癌的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 21;21(15):4635-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4635.
9
Safety and effectiveness of chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球化疗栓塞术治疗晚期肝细胞癌的安全性与有效性
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Apr;37(2):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0654-7. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10
Imaging Changes and Clinical Complications After Drug-Eluting Bead Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Study.不可切除肝细胞癌患者经载药微球与传统经动脉化疗栓塞治疗后的影像学改变及临床并发症:多中心研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Oct;217(4):933-943. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24708. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunological Landscape and Molecular Therapeutic Targets of the Tumor Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌肿瘤微环境的免疫格局与分子治疗靶点
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 13;26(16):7836. doi: 10.3390/ijms26167836.
2
The impact of age on the survival outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after transarterial chemoembolization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.年龄对经动脉化疗栓塞术后肝细胞癌患者生存结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):1234-1243. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.11718.

本文引用的文献

1
Systemic Treatment for Older Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.不可切除肝细胞癌老年患者的系统治疗。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Jul;38(7):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00871-5. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Survival and Tolerability of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Greater Versus less than 70 Years of Age Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis.
经动脉化疗栓塞术在 70 岁以上与 70 岁以下不可切除肝细胞癌患者中的生存和耐受性:倾向评分分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):1015-1024. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02451-3. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
4
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.
5
Safety and Prognosis of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Octogenarians with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.高龄原发性肝癌患者经肝动脉化疗栓塞术的安全性及预后分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):1413-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02290-x. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
The Tsinghua-Lancet Commission on Healthy Cities in China: unlocking the power of cities for a healthy China.清华-柳叶刀中国健康城市委员会:释放城市力量,建设健康中国。
Lancet. 2018 May 26;391(10135):2140-2184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30486-0. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.欧洲肝脏研究学会临床实践指南:肝细胞癌的管理
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization for HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.经动脉化疗栓塞术辅助治疗 HBV 相关肝细胞癌切除术后:一项随机对照研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 1;24(9):2074-2081. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2899. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and safety in elderly patients.经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗中晚期肝细胞癌:老年患者的临床疗效和安全性。
J Cancer. 2014 Jul 17;5(7):590-7. doi: 10.7150/jca.9413. eCollection 2014.
10
Treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients are as effective as in younger patients: a 20-year multicentre experience.老年肝细胞癌患者的治疗与年轻患者同样有效:20 年多中心经验。
Gut. 2010 Mar;59(3):387-96. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.194217.