• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究

Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

作者信息

Liang Bin, Xiang Hua, Ma Cong, Xiong Bin, Ma Yilong, Zhao Chang, Yao Yuanhui, Zhang Zishu, Chen Changyong, Li Haiping, Long Qingyun, Zhou Jun, Luo Chao, Qiu Huaiming, Hu Hongyao, Zhao Hui, Zhou Guofeng, Zheng Chuansheng

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S187203
PMID:32104076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7020935/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with CalliSpheres microspheres (CSM-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-five HCC patients receiving CSM-TACE or cTACE were consecutively enrolled in this multi-center, retrospective cohort study, and then divided into CSM-TACE group and cTACE group accordingly. Complete response (CR), objective response (ORR) and disease control response (DCR) was assessed according to mRECIST criteria at 1 month (M1), 3 months(M3) and 6 months(M6) after treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Liver function indexes and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

CR at M3 (=0.020) and ORR at M1 (<0.001), M3 (<0.001) and M6 (=0.017) after treatment were significantly higher in the CSM-TACE compared with cTACE group. DCRs, PFS (25.3 months vs 24.2 months, =0.503) and OS (27.8 months vs 25.3 months, =0.203) were similar between the two groups. CSM-TACE was independently correlated with higher ORR at M1 (=0.002) and longer OS (=0.023). Abnormal alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (=0.049) was independently associated with lower ORR at M3, and history of alcohol intake (=0.019) and largest nodule size ≥7 cm (=0.015) independently correlated with lower ORR at M6 (=0.015). Largest nodule size ≥7 cm (=0.029) and abnormal albumin (ALB) (=0.046) were independently associated with shorter PFS. Child-Pugh stage B/C (=0.023), abnormal ALB (=0.001), ALP (=0.008) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (=0.005) were independently associated with shorter OS. Most liver function indexes and AEs were similar between the two groups (>0.05), except that ALP (=0.005), total bilirubin (=0.031), pain during procedure (=0.034) and occurrence of fever post(treatment (=0.017) were significantly elevated in the CSM-TACE compared with cTACE group.

CONCLUSION

CSM-TACE presents with a better treatment response and similar survival profile compared with cTACE in HCC patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用载药微球的经动脉化疗栓塞术(CSM-TACE)与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术(cTACE)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

本多中心回顾性队列研究连续纳入335例接受CSM-TACE或cTACE治疗的HCC患者,并据此分为CSM-TACE组和cTACE组。根据mRECIST标准在治疗后1个月(M1)、3个月(M3)和6个月(M6)评估完全缓解(CR)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。评估无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。还评估了肝功能指标和不良事件(AE)。

结果

与cTACE组相比,CSM-TACE组治疗后M3时的CR(=0.020)以及M1(<0.001)、M3(<0.001)和M6(=0.017)时的ORR显著更高。两组之间的DCR、PFS(25.3个月对24.2个月,=0.503)和OS(27.8个月对25.3个月,=0.203)相似。CSM-TACE与M1时更高的ORR(=0.002)和更长的OS(=0.023)独立相关。碱性磷酸酶(ALP)异常(=0.049)与M3时较低的ORR独立相关,饮酒史(=0.019)和最大结节大小≥7 cm(=0.015)与M6时较低的ORR独立相关(=0.015)。最大结节大小≥7 cm(=0.029)和白蛋白(ALB)异常(=0.046)与较短的PFS独立相关。Child-Pugh B/C期(=0.023)、ALB异常(=0.001)、ALP(=0.008)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)(=0.005)与较短的OS独立相关。两组之间大多数肝功能指标和AE相似(>0.05),但与cTACE组相比,CSM-TACE组的ALP(=0.005)、总胆红素(=0.031)、术中疼痛(=0.034)和治疗后发热发生率(=0.017)显著升高。

结论

与cTACE相比,CSM-TACE在HCC患者中表现出更好的治疗反应和相似的生存情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/8984077c9f3f/CMAR-12-941-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/fb64fb5a1973/CMAR-12-941-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/f1fe03a85d76/CMAR-12-941-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/990a83f81ec8/CMAR-12-941-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/8984077c9f3f/CMAR-12-941-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/fb64fb5a1973/CMAR-12-941-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/f1fe03a85d76/CMAR-12-941-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/990a83f81ec8/CMAR-12-941-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4021/7020935/8984077c9f3f/CMAR-12-941-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.
2
Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球栓塞化疗与常规肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌疗效及生存的综合预测因素
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar;45(2):101460. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Comparison of treatment response, survival and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球(CalliSpheres®)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性比较
J BUON. 2019 May-Jun;24(3):1150-1166.
4
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球(CalliSpheres)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术作为肝细胞癌患者一线治疗的疗效与安全性比较
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):7456-7470. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of Treatment Response, Survival Profiles, as Well as Safety Profiles Between CalliSpheres Microsphere Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma.CalliSpheres微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗巨大肝细胞癌的疗效、生存情况及安全性比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:793581. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.793581. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of liver function and safety in hepatocellular cancer patients treated with DEB-TACE and cTACE: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study.经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术(cTACE)治疗肝细胞癌患者的肝功能及安全性比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Sep;8(5):1950-1964. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.09.15.
7
Treatment Response, Survival, and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization With CalliSpheres Microspheres Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性:一项荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 16;11:576232. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.576232. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.载药微球与常规 TACE 治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
9
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history.对于有传统经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗史的肝细胞癌患者,载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)显示出比传统TACE更好的疗效和相同的耐受性。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;46(3):101814. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101814. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: A comparison of efficacy and safety.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与传统TACE治疗有多次传统TACE治疗史的肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(21):e15314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015314.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization vs conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in adult patients: a systematic review and update meta-analysis of observational studies.药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗成年肝细胞癌的比较:观察性研究的系统评价与更新的荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 12;14:1526268. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1526268. eCollection 2024.
2
5-Fluorouracil combined with CalliSphere drug-eluting beads or conventional transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis.5-氟尿嘧啶联合 CalliSphere 载药微球与常规经动脉化疗栓塞治疗不可切除肝细胞癌:倾向评分加权分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77531-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Affecting Clinical Response and Short-Term Survival to Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Treatment in Patients With Liver Cancer.影响肝癌患者药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗临床反应及短期生存因素的综合分析
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818759878. doi: 10.1177/1533033818759878.
2
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.欧洲肝脏研究学会临床实践指南:肝细胞癌的管理
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Sustained multiple organ ischaemia after transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Repeated Partial Splenic Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Hypersplenism and Thrombocytopenia.经动脉化疗栓塞术联合重复部分脾栓塞术治疗合并脾功能亢进和血小板减少症的肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Jun 11;11:1065-1078. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S455461. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical research progress of callisperes of drug-loaded microsphere arterial chemoembolisation in the treatment of solid tumors.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗实体瘤的临床研究进展
Discov Oncol. 2024 May 13;15(1):161. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01030-z.
5
Safety and Effectiveness of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Aged Greater versus Less Than 80 Years.经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗 80 岁以上与 80 岁以下肝细胞癌患者的安全性和有效性。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Nov 14;18:1883-1892. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S429259. eCollection 2023.
6
Construction of pain prediction model for patients undergoing hepatic arterial chemoembolization.构建肝动脉化疗栓塞患者疼痛预测模型。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar 20;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02986-y.
7
Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.载药微球与常规 TACE 治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
8
Callispheres drug-eluting bead transhepatic artery chemoembolization with oral delivery of sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable liver cancer.载药微球经肝动脉化疗栓塞联合索拉非尼口服治疗不可切除肝癌
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 2;9:981116. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.981116. eCollection 2022.
9
CalliSpheres microsphere transarterial chemoembolization combined with I brachytherapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer liver metastases.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞联合碘-125粒子植入治疗非小细胞肺癌肝转移患者
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 12;12:882061. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882061. eCollection 2022.
10
Tumor Response and Nomogram-Based Prognostic Stratification for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization.经动脉化疗栓塞术联合载药微球治疗肝细胞癌后的肿瘤反应及基于列线图的预后分层
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2022 Jun 7;9:537-551. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S360421. eCollection 2022.
经动脉化疗栓塞联合载药微球治疗肝细胞癌后出现持续性多器官缺血。
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Feb;15(2):1479-1483. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5540. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
Conventional drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.传统药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌。
World J Hepatol. 2017 Jun 28;9(18):808-814. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i18.808.
5
Comparison of Triple-Drug Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) With Single-Drug TACE Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads: Long-Term Survival in 313 Patients.多柔比星洗脱微球载药 TACE 与单纯 TACE 治疗原发性肝癌的长期生存比较:313 例患者分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct;209(4):722-732. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18219. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
Albumin-Bilirubin and Platelet-Albumin-Bilirubin Grades Accurately Predict Overall Survival in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.白蛋白-胆红素及血小板-白蛋白-胆红素分级准确预测接受常规经动脉化疗栓塞术的高危肝细胞癌患者的总生存期。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Sep;28(9):1224-1231.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
7
Comparison of pharmacokinetics and drug release in tissues after transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin using diverse lipiodol emulsions and CalliSpheres Beads in rabbit livers.在兔肝脏中使用不同的碘油乳剂和载药微球进行经动脉化疗栓塞后,比较阿霉素在组织中的药代动力学和药物释放情况。
Drug Deliv. 2017 Nov;24(1):1011-1017. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1344336.
8
[Development of CalliSpheres® embolic microspheres].[CalliSpheres®栓塞微球的研发]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 20;24(7):549-551. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2016.07.016.
9
Nine-year experience of doxorubicin-eluting beads chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.多柔比星洗脱微球肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌九年经验
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016 Oct;15(5):493-498. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60133-9.
10
Conventional versus Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Tertiary Medical Centre Experience in Malaysia.常规与多柔比星洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗不可切除肝细胞癌:马来西亚一家三级医疗中心的经验
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):4037-41.