Trofimov Alex O, Agarkova Darya I, Trofimova Kseniia A, Nemoto Edwin M, Bragina Olga A, Bragin Denis E
Department of Neurological Diseases, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Brain Spine. 2023 Sep 21;3:102675. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102675. eCollection 2023.
The relationship between arterial and venous blood flow in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is poorly understood.
was to compare differences in perfusion computed tomography (PCT)-derived arterial and venous cerebral blood flow (CBF) in moderate-to-severe TBI as an indication of changes in cerebral venous outflow patterns referenced to arterial inflow.
Moderate-to-severe TBI patients (women 53; men 74) underwent PCT and were stratified into 3 groups: I (moderate TBI), II (diffuse severe TBI without surgery), and III (severe TBI after the surgery). Arterial and venous CBF were measured by PCT in both the internal carotid arteries (CBFica) and the confluence of upper sagittal, transverse, and straight sinuses (CBFcs).
In group I, CBFica on the left and right sides were significantly correlated with each other (p < 0.0001) and with CBFcs (p = 0.048). In group II, CBFica on the left and right sides were also correlated (P < 0.0000001) but not with CBFcs. Intracranial pressure reactivity (PRx) and CBFcs were correlated (p = 0.00014). In group III, CBFica on the side of the removed hematoma was not significantly different from the opposite CBFica (P = 0.680) and was not correlated with CBFcs.
The increasing severity of TBI is accompanied by a rising uncoupling between the arterial and venous CBF in the supratentorial vessels suggesting a shifting of cerebral venous outflow.
中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中动脉血流与静脉血流之间的关系尚未完全明确。
旨在比较中重度TBI患者灌注计算机断层扫描(PCT)得出的动脉和静脉脑血流量(CBF)差异,以此作为参考动脉流入量的脑静脉流出模式变化的指标。
中重度TBI患者(女性53例;男性74例)接受PCT检查,并分为3组:I组(中度TBI)、II组(非手术的弥漫性重度TBI)和III组(手术后的重度TBI)。通过PCT测量颈内动脉(CBFica)以及上矢状窦、横窦和直窦汇合处(CBFcs)的动脉和静脉CBF。
在I组中,左右两侧的CBFica彼此显著相关(p < 0.0001),且与CBFcs相关(p = 0.048)。在II组中,左右两侧的CBFica也具有相关性(P < 0.0000001),但与CBFcs不相关。颅内压反应性(PRx)与CBFcs相关(p = 0.00014)。在III组中,血肿清除侧的CBFica与对侧CBFica无显著差异(P = 0.680),且与CBFcs不相关。
TBI严重程度的增加伴随着幕上血管中动脉和静脉CBF之间解偶联的增加,提示脑静脉流出发生改变。