Department of Pneumology, University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Nov 17;18:2661-2672. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S426919. eCollection 2023.
The Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) study assessed the prevalence and clinical characteristics of four clinical COPD phenotypes, but not mortality. This retrospective analysis of the POPE study (RETRO-POPE) investigated the relationship between all-cause mortality and patient characteristics using two grouping methods: clinical phenotyping (as in POPE) and Burgel clustering, to better identify high-risk patients.
The two largest POPE study patient cohorts (Czech Republic and Serbia) were categorized into one of four clinical phenotypes (acute exacerbators [with/without chronic bronchitis], non-exacerbators, asthma-COPD overlap), and one of five Burgel clusters based on comorbidities, lung function, age, body mass index (BMI) and dyspnea (very severe comorbid, very severe respiratory, moderate-to-severe respiratory, moderate-to-severe comorbid/obese, and mild respiratory). Patients were followed-up for approximately 7 years for survival status.
Overall, 801 of 1,003 screened patients had sufficient data for analysis. Of these, 440 patients (54.9%) were alive and 361 (45.1%) had died at the end of follow-up. Analysis of survival by clinical phenotype showed no significant differences between the phenotypes (P=0.211). However, Burgel clustering demonstrated significant differences in survival between clusters (P<0.001), with patients in the "very severe comorbid" and "very severe respiratory" clusters most likely to die. Overall survival was not significantly different between Serbia and the Czech Republic after adjustment for age, BMI, comorbidities and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.99; P=0.036 [unadjusted]; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.7-1.1; P=0.257 [adjusted]). The most common causes of death were respiratory-related (36.8%), followed by cardiovascular (25.2%) then neoplasm (15.2%).
Patient clusters based on comorbidities, lung function, age, BMI and dyspnea were more likely to show differences in COPD mortality risk than phenotypes defined by exacerbation history and presence/absence of chronic bronchitis and/or asthmatic features.
中欧和东欧 COPD 表型(POPE)研究评估了四种临床 COPD 表型的患病率和临床特征,但不包括死亡率。这项对 POPE 研究的回顾性分析(RETRO-POPE)使用两种分组方法(如 POPE 中的临床表型和 Burgel 聚类)研究了全因死亡率与患者特征之间的关系,以更好地识别高危患者。
POPE 研究中两个最大的患者队列(捷克共和国和塞尔维亚)被分为以下四种临床表型之一(急性加重期[伴/不伴慢性支气管炎]、非加重期、哮喘-COPD 重叠),以及 Burgel 聚类中的五种之一,根据合并症、肺功能、年龄、体重指数(BMI)和呼吸困难(严重合并症、严重呼吸系统、中重度呼吸系统、中重度合并症/肥胖和轻度呼吸系统)。对患者进行了大约 7 年的随访,以确定生存状况。
总体而言,1003 名筛查患者中有 801 名有足够的数据进行分析。其中,440 名患者(54.9%)存活,361 名(45.1%)在随访结束时死亡。通过临床表型分析生存情况,各表型之间无显著差异(P=0.211)。然而,Burgel 聚类在各聚类之间的生存差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),“严重合并症”和“严重呼吸系统”聚类的患者最有可能死亡。调整年龄、BMI、合并症和 1 秒用力呼气量(危险比 [HR] 0.80,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.65-0.99;P=0.036[未调整];HR 0.88,95% CI 0.7-1.1;P=0.257[调整])后,塞尔维亚和捷克共和国之间的总体生存率无显著差异。最常见的死亡原因是呼吸系统相关(36.8%),其次是心血管疾病(25.2%),然后是肿瘤(15.2%)。
基于合并症、肺功能、年龄、BMI 和呼吸困难的患者聚类比根据加重史以及是否存在慢性支气管炎和/或哮喘特征定义的表型更有可能显示 COPD 死亡风险的差异。