Robles Rebeca, Infante Sara, Feria Miriam, Arango Iván, Tirado Elsa, Rodríguez-Delgado Andrés, Miranda Edgar, Fresán Ana, Becerra Claudia, Escamilla Raul, Madrigal de León Eduardo Angel
Global Mental Health Research Center, Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.
Directorate of Clinical Services, Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 31;14:1253179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1253179. eCollection 2023.
Despite the propagation of virtual mental health services for vulnerable groups during COVID-19 pandemic, the implementation and evaluation of remote evidence-based practices (EBP) to manage them in low- and middle-income countries remains scarce. In the current study, we describe and evaluate the implementation process and clinical impact of brief, remote, manualized EBP for crisis intervention and suicide risk management among healthcare workers attending patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19-HCWs) in Mexico.
The implementation process comprised community engagement of volunteer mental health specialists, creation of new clinical teams with different disciplines and skills, intervention systematization through manuals and education through 4-h remote training as main strategies. Mexican COVID-19-HCWs who had used a free 24-h helpline rated their pre- and post-intervention emotional distress. Therapists recorded patients' pre-intervention diagnosis, severity, and suicide risk, the techniques used in each case, and their post-treatment perception of COVID-19-HCWs' improvement at the end of the intervention.
All techniques included in the intervention manual were employed at least in one case ( = 51). At the beginning of the intervention, 65.9% of the COVID-19-HCWs were considered moderately ill or worse according to Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores, whereas at the end, 79.4% of them were perceived as much or very much improved according to CGI-Improvement scores (CGI-I), and their emotional distress had been significantly reduced ( < 0.001).
This prospective study provides evidence that implementation of remote EBP is feasible and useful to reduce emotional distress and suicide risk among COVID-19-HCWs from a middle-income country. However, this study was limited by lack of a control group, improvement ratings provided by therapists and non-anonymous satisfaction ratings.
尽管在新冠疫情期间为弱势群体推广了虚拟心理健康服务,但在低收入和中等收入国家,实施和评估用于管理这些群体的远程循证实践(EBP)仍然很少见。在本研究中,我们描述并评估了针对墨西哥护理新冠患者的医护人员(COVID-19-HCWs)进行危机干预和自杀风险管理的简短、远程、手册化循证实践的实施过程和临床影响。
实施过程包括让心理健康专家志愿者参与社区活动、组建具有不同学科和技能的新临床团队、通过手册进行干预系统化以及通过4小时远程培训进行教育等主要策略。使用过免费24小时热线的墨西哥COVID-19-HCWs对干预前后的情绪困扰进行了评分。治疗师记录了患者干预前的诊断、严重程度和自杀风险、每个案例中使用的技术,以及干预结束时他们对COVID-19-HCWs改善情况的治疗后看法。
干预手册中包含的所有技术至少在一个案例(n = 51)中被使用。在干预开始时,根据临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)评分,65.9%的COVID-19-HCWs被认为病情中等或更严重,而在结束时,根据临床总体印象改善评分(CGI-I),79.4%的人被认为有很大或非常大的改善,并且他们的情绪困扰显著降低(p < 0.001)。
这项前瞻性研究提供了证据,表明实施远程循证实践对于降低来自中等收入国家的COVID-19-HCWs的情绪困扰和自杀风险是可行且有用的。然而,本研究受到缺乏对照组、治疗师提供的改善评分以及非匿名满意度评分的限制。