Wang Na, Chung Man Cheung, Wang Yabing, Liu Fangsong
School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Department of Psychology, Zayed University.
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Sep;16(6):999-1009. doi: 10.1037/tra0001628. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
The present study aimed to examine the profile patterns of co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), cognitive emotion regulation (CER), and disorganized attachment in traumatized adolescents. It also aimed to examine whether these adolescents with different profiles would differ in posttraumatic growth (PTG) and comorbid psychiatric symptoms after controlling for academic stress and egocentrism.
Nine hundred and forty-nine ( = 949) adolescents were recruited from two secondary schools in China. They completed measures on PTSD, comorbid psychiatric symptoms, PTG, CER, disorganized attachment, and covariates of egocentrism and academic stress.
Latent profile analysis identified a four-class model as the optimal solution: low trauma group (Class 1), adaptive copers (Class 2), moderate trauma group (Class 3), and high trauma group (Class 4). After controlling for demographics and levels of egocentrism and academic stress, Class 4 had more severe comorbid psychiatric symptoms than the other three classes. Class 3 had higher levels of comorbid psychiatric symptoms than Class 2 and Class 1, while these latter two were comparable in comorbid psychiatric symptoms. Conversely, Class 4 students had lower levels of PTG than individuals in the other three classes. Class 3 had similar levels of PTG to Class 1, and these two classes reported lower levels of PTG than Class 2.
Chinese adolescents may experience both negative and positive changes after stressful events. The extent of these psychological outcomes could vary depending on the adolescents' previous trauma experiences, emotion regulation, and attachment qualities. Implications for clinical practice were discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究旨在探讨受创伤青少年中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、认知情绪调节(CER)和紊乱依恋共现的特征模式。还旨在研究在控制学业压力和自我中心主义后,这些具有不同特征的青少年在创伤后成长(PTG)和共病精神症状方面是否存在差异。
从中国两所中学招募了949名青少年。他们完成了关于PTSD、共病精神症状、PTG、CER、紊乱依恋以及自我中心主义和学业压力协变量的测量。
潜在剖面分析确定四类模型为最佳解决方案:低创伤组(第1类)、适应性应对者(第2类)、中度创伤组(第3类)和高创伤组(第4类)。在控制人口统计学以及自我中心主义和学业压力水平后,第4类比其他三类有更严重的共病精神症状。第3类的共病精神症状水平高于第2类和第1类,而后两类在共病精神症状方面相当。相反,第4类学生的PTG水平低于其他三类个体。第3类的PTG水平与第1类相似,这两类报告的PTG水平低于第2类。
中国青少年在经历应激事件后可能会出现消极和积极的变化。这些心理结果的程度可能因青少年以前的创伤经历、情绪调节和依恋特质而有所不同。讨论了对临床实践的启示。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)