Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼物理治疗师对腰痛患者的出院处理:一项英国调查。

Musculoskeletal physiotherapists' discharge practices for people treated with low back pain: A United Kingdom survey.

作者信息

Smith Toby, Singh Gurpreet, Mcnamee George, Newton Christopher

机构信息

Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Musculoskeletal Care. 2023 Nov 30. doi: 10.1002/msc.1851.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persistent low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability, and a major burden on the healthcare system globally. Many people with LBP experience recurrent pain flares and receive repeated appointments and re-referrals to services such as physiotherapy. However, it is not clear what the criteria are for discharging people with LBP from physiotherapy services. This study aims to describe the current practices for discharging people from physiotherapy for LBP in the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using an anonymous online national (UK) survey was conducted among qualified physiotherapists who treat people with LBP in UK musculoskeletal out-patient services.

RESULTS

A total of 104 surveys were completed. The majority of respondents reported using (i) a shared decision-making (77%) and (ii) person-physiotherapist goal attainment (74%) approach to discharging people with LBP. Sixty-three percent of respondents reported using a patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) approach. Only 8% of respondents reported using a graded discharge approach with 'booster' appointments. A PIFU or graded discharge approach was considered most pertinent for people at higher risk of a pain flare (97%; 86%) and with low self-efficacy to self-manage their LBP.

CONCLUSIONS

This UK survey established that discharge practices for people with LBP after physiotherapy vary. Whilst the majority of people are currently discharged with a PIFU appointment, a graded discharge approach may be more beneficial for people who are less likely to initiate a PIFU appointment. Further consideration on the development of such a pathway is now required.

摘要

背景

持续性腰痛是导致残疾的主要原因,也是全球医疗保健系统的一大负担。许多腰痛患者经历反复发作的疼痛,并多次预约并被转介到物理治疗等服务机构。然而,目前尚不清楚将腰痛患者从物理治疗服务中出院的标准是什么。本研究旨在描述英国目前将腰痛患者从物理治疗中出院的做法。

方法

在英国肌肉骨骼门诊治疗腰痛患者的合格物理治疗师中,进行了一项使用匿名在线全国(英国)调查的横断面研究。

结果

共完成了104份调查问卷。大多数受访者报告使用(i)共同决策(77%)和(ii)患者与物理治疗师目标达成(74%)的方法来让腰痛患者出院。63%的受访者报告使用患者发起的随访(PIFU)方法。只有8%的受访者报告使用带有“强化”预约的分级出院方法。PIFU或分级出院方法被认为对疼痛发作风险较高(97%;86%)且自我管理腰痛自我效能较低的患者最为适用。

结论

这项英国调查表明,物理治疗后腰痛患者的出院做法各不相同。虽然目前大多数患者通过PIFU预约出院,但分级出院方法可能对不太可能发起PIFU预约的患者更有益。现在需要进一步考虑制定这样一条途径。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验