• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床评估专家:一种改进实习评估的新教师角色。

Clinical Assessment Specialists: A New Faculty Role to Improve Clerkship Assessment.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.

The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

Perm J. 2024 Mar 15;28(1):76-80. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.062. Epub 2023 Dec 1.

DOI:10.7812/TPP/23.062
PMID:38037372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10940249/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ambulatory clerkships, including longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs), face challenges to assessment, including time pressure and clinical demands on preceptors. High-quality clinical assessment is critical to implementing competency-based medical education, generating valid grades, and supporting learning. This importance is further heightened with the new pass/fail scoring for US Medical Licensing Exam Step 1, discontinuation of US Medical Licensing Exam Step 2 Clinical Skills, and the growing concern for bias in assessment.

METHODS

The Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine's LIC spans the first 2 years with 50 students per class. In 2021-2022, the authors created a new faculty role, the clinical assessment specialist (CASp). CASps are highly trained clinical teachers who directly observe clerkship students in the ambulatory setting, provide feedback, and complete competency-based assessment forms.

RESULTS

CASps completed 186 assessments of first-year (Y1) LIC students and 333 assessments of second-year (Y2) LIC students. Y2 students achieved average higher milestones and were rated as requiring less supervision compared to Y1 students. Y1 students rated CASps more favorably than Y2 students. Preceptors rated the contribution of CASps similarly across both years. Clerkship directors described benefits including identification of at-risk students and value of augmenting preceptor assessments.

DISCUSSION

The CASp role may offer an innovative way to generate valid assessment of student performance, offset clinical pressures faced by preceptors, identify at-risk students, and mitigate bias, especially in an LIC. Future studies may examine assessment validity, including use in summative assessment.

CONCLUSION

CASps are an innovative approach to clinical clerkship assessment.

摘要

简介

门诊实习,包括纵向综合实习(LICs),在评估方面面临挑战,包括时间压力和导师对临床的要求。高质量的临床评估对于实施基于能力的医学教育、生成有效成绩和支持学习至关重要。随着美国医师执照考试第 1 步采用新的通过/不通过评分、停止美国医师执照考试第 2 步临床技能考试,以及对评估中存在偏见的日益关注,这种重要性进一步提高。

方法

凯撒永久医疗集团伯纳德 J. 泰森医学院的 LIC 贯穿前 2 年,每班 50 名学生。在 2021-2022 年,作者创建了一个新的教师角色,即临床评估专家(CASp)。CASp 是经过高度培训的临床教师,他们直接在门诊环境中观察实习学生,提供反馈,并完成基于能力的评估表。

结果

CASp 完成了 186 名一年级(Y1)LIC 学生和 333 名二年级(Y2)LIC 学生的评估。Y2 学生平均达到更高的里程碑,并且被认为比 Y1 学生需要更少的监督。Y1 学生对 CASp 的评价比 Y2 学生更有利。导师对这两年的 CASp 贡献评价相似。实习主任描述了 CASp 的优势,包括识别有风险的学生和增强导师评估的价值。

讨论

CASp 角色可能提供了一种创新的方法,可以对学生的表现进行有效的评估,减轻导师面临的临床压力,识别有风险的学生,并减轻偏见,特别是在 LIC 中。未来的研究可以检验评估的有效性,包括在总结性评估中的应用。

结论

CASp 是一种创新的临床实习评估方法。

相似文献

1
Clinical Assessment Specialists: A New Faculty Role to Improve Clerkship Assessment.临床评估专家:一种改进实习评估的新教师角色。
Perm J. 2024 Mar 15;28(1):76-80. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.062. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
2
Positive Outcomes of Optimizing Student-Preceptor Continuity in a Traditional Block Clerkship.优化传统模块式临床实习中学生与带教老师连贯性的积极成果。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):202-212. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1412832. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
Perceptions of evaluation in longitudinal versus traditional clerkships.纵向实习与传统实习评估观念的比较。
Med Educ. 2011 May;45(5):464-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03904.x.
4
Outcomes of different clerkship models: longitudinal integrated, hybrid, and block.不同实习模式的结果:纵向综合、混合和块状。
Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):35-43. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318276ca9b.
5
Faculty experience and engagement in a longitudinal integrated clerkship.教师在纵向综合实习中的经验和参与度。
Med Teach. 2017 May;39(5):527-534. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1297528. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
6
Midclerkship feedback in the surgical clerkship: the "Professionalism, Reporting, Interpreting, Managing, Educating, and Procedural Skills" application utilizing learner self-assessment.外科实习期间的实习中期反馈:利用学习者自我评估的“专业素养、报告、解读、管理、教育及操作技能”应用
Am J Surg. 2017 Feb;213(2):212-216. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
7
Faculty verbal evaluations reveal strategies used to promote medical student performance.教师口头评价揭示了促进医学生表现的策略。
Med Educ Online. 2011;16. doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.6354. Epub 2011 May 16.
8
A web-based system for students to document their experiences within six core competency domains during all clinical clerkships.一个基于网络的系统,用于让学生记录他们在所有临床实习期间在六个核心能力领域的经历。
Acad Med. 2007 Jan;82(1):51-73. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000249990.86538.ac.
9
Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback.迈向精通:学生对采用及格/不及格评分及强化反馈的临床实习评估看法的变化
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Apr-May;34(2):198-208. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1922285. Epub 2021 May 20.
10
From Grading to Assessment for Learning: A Qualitative Study of Student Perceptions Surrounding Elimination of Core Clerkship Grades and Enhanced Formative Feedback.从评分到为学习而评估:一项定性研究,探讨了学生对核心实习成绩取消和增强形成性反馈的看法。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jun-Jul;33(3):314-325. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1847654. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Master clinical teachers and personalised learning.掌握临床教学技能和个性化学习。
Clin Teach. 2023 Apr;20(2):e13562. doi: 10.1111/tct.13562. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
2
Farewell to the Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam: New Opportunities, Obligations, and Next Steps.告别 Step 2 Clinical Skills 考试:新机遇、新义务和下一步。
Acad Med. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1250-1253. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004209.
3
Internal medicine residency program director perceptions of USMLE Step 1 pass/fail scoring: A cross-sectional survey.内科住院医师规范化培训项目主任对 USMLE 步骤 1 通过/失败评分的看法:一项横断面调查。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 16;100(15):e25284. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025284.
4
How Small Differences in Assessed Clinical Performance Amplify to Large Differences in Grades and Awards: A Cascade With Serious Consequences for Students Underrepresented in Medicine.评估临床绩效的微小差异如何放大为成绩和奖励的巨大差异:对医学领域代表性不足的学生产生严重后果的级联效应。
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1286-1292. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002323.
5
Faculty Development Revisited: A Systems-Based View of Stakeholder Development to Meet the Demands of Entrustable Professional Activity Implementation.再探教师发展:从系统的角度出发,培养利益相关者,以满足可委托专业活动实施的要求。
Acad Med. 2018 Oct;93(10):1472-1479. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002297.
6
Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education.基于能力的医学教育评估的核心原则。
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):609-616. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082.
7
Evolving concepts of assessment in a competency-based world.从以能力为基础的世界看评估理念的发展。
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):603-608. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315071.
8
Team-based assessment of medical students in a clinical clerkship is feasible and acceptable.临床实习中以团队为基础对医学生进行评估是可行且可接受的。
Med Teach. 2012;34(7):555-61. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.669083.
9
Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning.计划性评估:从学习评估到学习促进评估。
Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478-85. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828.
10
Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education.评估中的教师发展:以能力为基础的医学教育中的缺失环节。
Acad Med. 2011 Apr;86(4):460-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820cb2a7.