• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)材料和设计对降低 PICC 相关并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC-related complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Catheterization Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, People's Hospital of zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Henan Evidence-based Nursing Centre: A JBI Affiliated Group, The University of Adelaide, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Mar;21(3):e14468. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14468. Epub 2023 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.14468
PMID:38050652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898378/
Abstract

Studies showed that integrating coating or valve into Peripherally Inserted Central (PICC) can prevent related complications. However, data regarding efficiency were controversial. Therefore, a systematic review was needed to analyse the effect of PICC materials and designs on reduction of PICC-related complications. We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, EMbase, grey literature and referent literature from inception to 5 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control study were included. Two authors extracted data independently, using a predesigned Excel form, and assessed the quality of included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (V5.1.0), case-control study was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were analysed using Review Manager (v5.3.0). A total of 10 RCTs and one case-control study were included. Meta-analysis results showed that PICC designs reduce the incidence of obstruction, and at the critical value of PICC-associated bloodstream infection, but may have no effects on other complications. Based on the literature reviewed, we can only say PICC new materials did not reflect significant reduction on complications, what's more, the result needs more multicentre, large RCTs to support. We suggested clinicians combine descriptive research and cost-effect analysis to select appropriate PICC materials and designs for patients.

摘要

研究表明,在经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)中加入涂层或瓣膜可以预防相关并发症。然而,关于其效率的数据存在争议。因此,需要进行系统评价来分析 PICC 材料和设计对减少 PICC 相关并发症的影响。我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、EMbase、灰色文献和参考文献,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 8 月 5 日。纳入随机对照试验(RCT)和病例对照研究。两位作者独立提取数据,使用预先设计的 Excel 表格,并根据 Cochrane 系统评价手册(V5.1.0)评估 RCT 的质量,病例对照研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。使用 Review Manager(v5.3.0)进行数据分析。共纳入 10 项 RCT 和 1 项病例对照研究。Meta 分析结果表明,PICC 设计可降低阻塞和 PICC 相关性血流感染的发生率,但对其他并发症可能没有影响。基于我们回顾的文献,我们只能说 PICC 新材料并没有显著降低并发症的发生率,而且,这一结果需要更多的多中心、大样本 RCT 来支持。我们建议临床医生结合描述性研究和成本效益分析,为患者选择合适的 PICC 材料和设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/0eafbc791424/IWJ-21-e14468-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/5c8bdf599928/IWJ-21-e14468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/ec741c8abcaf/IWJ-21-e14468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/63fc3e0d2dd1/IWJ-21-e14468-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/9a194c8f35c5/IWJ-21-e14468-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/0e4f74308eca/IWJ-21-e14468-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/0eafbc791424/IWJ-21-e14468-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/5c8bdf599928/IWJ-21-e14468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/ec741c8abcaf/IWJ-21-e14468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/63fc3e0d2dd1/IWJ-21-e14468-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/9a194c8f35c5/IWJ-21-e14468-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/0e4f74308eca/IWJ-21-e14468-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/10898378/0eafbc791424/IWJ-21-e14468-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC-related complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)材料和设计对降低 PICC 相关并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Mar;21(3):e14468. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14468. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheter design and material for reducing catheter failure and complications.用于减少导管故障和并发症的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的设计与材料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 28;6(6):CD013366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013366.pub2.
3
Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.成人急性医院患者外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的中心静脉通路装置固定与敷料有效性研究(CASCADE):一项试点随机对照试验
Trials. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2207-x.
4
Comparison of complication rates between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中线导管与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管并发症发生率的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Sep;151:131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Safety and effectiveness of tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters versus conventional PICC in adult cancer patients.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)与传统 PICC 在成人癌症患者中的安全性和有效性比较。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Dec;34(12):7776-7785. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10852-y. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
6
Peripherally inserted central catheters in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.异基因造血干细胞移植受者的外周置入中心静脉导管。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4193-4199. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05269-z. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: A prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures.化疗期间癌症患者的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC):并发症发生率及总体失败情况的前瞻性研究
J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):708-14. doi: 10.1002/jso.24220. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
Peripherally inserted central catheters inserted with current best practices have low deep vein thrombosis and central line-associated bloodstream infection risk compared with centrally inserted central catheters: A contemporary meta-analysis.与中心静脉置管相比,按照当前最佳实践插入的外周静脉中心导管发生深静脉血栓形成和中心静脉导管相关血流感染的风险较低:一项当代荟萃分析。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Jan;22(1):9-25. doi: 10.1177/1129729820916113. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Peripherally Inserted Central catheter iNnovation to reduce Infections and Clots (the PICNIC trial): a randomised controlled trial protocol.外周置入中心静脉导管减少感染和血栓形成创新研究(PICNIC试验):一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e042475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042475.
10
Impact of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated phlebitis in neonate guided by intracavitary electrocardiogram: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.腔内心电图引导下新生儿经外周中心静脉置管相关性静脉炎的影响:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1130-1138. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13971. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Perils of the PICC: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Associated Complications and Recommendations for Prevention in Clinical Practice-A Narrative Review.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的风险:临床实践中与经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管相关的并发症及预防建议——一篇叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):1993. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161993.
2
Development and validation of a nomogram risk prediction model for PICC-related thrombosis in children with hematological malignancies.血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关血栓形成的列线图风险预测模型的构建与验证
Clin Exp Med. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):195. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01707-x.