Vitaliano P P, Katon W, Russo J, Maiuro R D, Anderson K, Jones M
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Feb;175(2):78-84. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198702000-00002.
Illness behavior in panic disorder was examined by comparing the coping strategies of female primary care patients (34 with panic disorder, 30 with simple panic, and 78 without panic.) Relationships of coping and distress were also examined within each group. The groups differed significantly on the Ways of Coping Checklist, anxiety (SCL-90 and Zung scales), depression (SCL-90 and Beck scales), and number of phobias. The panic disorder group used proportionately less problem-focused and more wishful thinking than the other groups. Within the panic disorder group, anxiety and depression were correlated negatively with problem-focused coping and positively with wishful thinking, and number of phobias was correlated negatively with the seeking of social support and positively with wishful thinking. Most importantly, when an attempt was made to statistically separate panic patients with multiple phobias from those without multiple phobias, coping was a better marker than was distress. These results emphasize the importance of cognitions in illness behavior and anxiety disorder.
通过比较女性初级保健患者(34名恐慌症患者、30名单纯恐慌患者和78名无恐慌患者)的应对策略,对恐慌症中的患病行为进行了研究。同时也对每组患者应对方式与痛苦之间的关系进行了研究。在应对方式清单、焦虑(症状自评量表90和zung量表)、抑郁(症状自评量表90和贝克量表)以及恐惧症数量方面,各组之间存在显著差异。与其他组相比,恐慌症组较少采用针对问题的应对方式,而更多地采用如意算盘式思维。在恐慌症组中,焦虑和抑郁与针对问题的应对方式呈负相关,与如意算盘式思维呈正相关,恐惧症数量与寻求社会支持呈负相关,与如意算盘式思维呈正相关。最重要的是,当试图通过统计学方法将有多种恐惧症的恐慌症患者与无多种恐惧症的患者区分开来时,应对方式比痛苦程度更能作为一个指标。这些结果强调了认知在患病行为和焦虑症中的重要性。