Rasmussen Norman H, Agerter David C, Bernard Matthew E, Cha Stephen S
Consultant and Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ment Health Fam Med. 2010 Dec;7(4):197-207.
Background and objective Empirical data are scarce regarding the adaptive response to stress for patients with somatoform disorders. Our objective was to identify the preferred coping strategies of patients with abridged somatisation, a common condition in primary care. Because of the functional impairment associated with somatisation, we predicted a preference for less effective, emotion-focused coping strategies over more effective, problem-focused adaptations.Design We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study of physician referred primary care patients who presented with persistent, medically unexplained, physical symptoms. Patients were classified into two abridged somatisation groups by symptom frequency and duration, as determined by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. The groups were compared with each other and with a non-clinical reference group; outcome variables were eight emotion- and problem-focused strategies, as measured by the Ways of Coping Questionnaire.Results Of the 72 eligible individuals, 48 participated in the study. Median age was 48 years and 75% of patients were women; 26 had somatic syndrome and 22 had a subthreshold somatising level. Patients with abridged somatisation disorders preferred emotion-focused coping strategies - typically detachment and impact minimisation, wishful thinking and problem avoidance.Conclusions Patients with abridged somatising disorder responded to stress with predominantly emotion-focused strategies, which may be associated with a lower level of positive adaptive outcome. Our findings suggest that patients with abridged somatising disorders might benefit from emphasis on problem-focused coping strategies, delivered through primary care, to improve quality of life and decrease healthcare utilisation costs.
关于躯体形式障碍患者对应激的适应性反应的实证数据稀缺。我们的目的是确定简化躯体化患者(基层医疗中的常见情况)偏好的应对策略。由于与躯体化相关的功能损害,我们预测患者会偏好效果较差的、以情绪为中心的应对策略,而非更有效的、以问题为中心的应对方式。
我们对因身体症状持续且无医学解释而由医生转诊至基层医疗的患者进行了一项横断面观察性研究。根据诊断访谈表确定的症状频率和持续时间,将患者分为两个简化躯体化组。将这两组相互比较,并与一个非临床参照组进行比较;通过应对方式问卷测量的八个以情绪和问题为中心的策略作为结果变量。
72名符合条件的个体中,48名参与了研究。中位年龄为48岁,75%的患者为女性;26名患有躯体综合征,22名处于阈下躯体化水平。简化躯体化障碍患者偏好以情绪为中心的应对策略——通常是超脱和影响最小化、如意算盘和问题回避。
简化躯体化障碍患者主要以情绪为中心的策略应对压力,这可能与较低水平的积极适应性结果相关。我们的研究结果表明,简化躯体化障碍患者可能会从通过基层医疗提供的、强调以问题为中心的应对策略中受益,以改善生活质量并降低医疗利用成本。