• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证分层量表在预测哥伦比亚一家三级医院住院成人跌倒中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究。

Validation of the stratify scale for the prediction of falls among hospitalized adults in a tertiary hospital in Colombia: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Research Unit and Nursing Department, Fundación Cardio Infantil Instituto de Cardiología, Cl. 163a #13B-60, Bogotá D.C, Colombia.

Faculty of Nursing, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Avenida 42 No 48-11PBX, Bucaramanga, Colombia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):21640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48330-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-48330-y
PMID:38062044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10703912/
Abstract

The STRATIFY scale has been implemented as a preventive strategy for predicting the risk of accidental falls among hospitalized adults. However, there is still uncertainty about its accuracy. This study aimed to perform an external validation of the STRATIFY fall prediction scale in hospitalized adults in one tertiary care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. The study was a retrospective cohort of adult hospitalized patients in a high-level complexity care hospital. The sample selected included admitted patients (age ≥ 18), consecutively by the institution between 2018 and 2020, with an evaluation of the fall risk measured by the STRATIFY score given to each at the time of hospital admission. For assessing the scale's feasibility, its discriminative capability was obtained by calculating sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, predictive values, and area under the ROC curve. The evaluation included 93,347 patient hospital records (mean 56.9 years, 50.2% women). The overall sensitivity score was 0.672 [IC 95% 0.612-0.723], the specificity score was 0.612 [IC 95% 0.605-0.615], and the positive likelihood ratio was 1.73 [IC 95% 1.589-1.891]. The area under the ROC curve was 0.69 [IC 95% 0.66-0.72]. Subgroups of age obtained similar results. Applying the STRATIFY scale at hospital admission resulted in a lower performance of the tool-predict falls in hospitalized patients. It is necessary to implement an individual evaluation of the risk factors for falls in order to structure appropriate care plans to prevent and improve hospital safety.

摘要

STRATIFY 量表已被用作预测住院成人意外跌倒风险的预防策略。然而,其准确性仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在对哥伦比亚波哥大一家三级保健医院住院成人患者进行 STRATIFY 跌倒预测量表的外部验证。该研究为一家高复杂程度保健医院住院成年患者的回顾性队列研究。该样本包括 2018 年至 2020 年期间机构连续收治的成年住院患者(年龄≥18 岁),每位患者入院时均接受 STRATIFY 评分评估跌倒风险。为评估量表的可行性,通过计算灵敏度、特异性、似然比、预测值和 ROC 曲线下面积来获得其区分能力。评估包括 93347 例患者的住院记录(平均年龄 56.9 岁,50.2%为女性)。总体灵敏度评分为 0.672[95%CI 0.612-0.723],特异性评分为 0.612[95%CI 0.605-0.615],阳性似然比为 1.73[95%CI 0.589-0.891]。ROC 曲线下面积为 0.69[95%CI 0.66-0.72]。年龄亚组得到了类似的结果。在入院时应用 STRATIFY 量表导致该工具预测住院患者跌倒的性能降低。有必要对跌倒的危险因素进行个体评估,以制定适当的护理计划,预防和提高医院安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c979/10703912/379703e81101/41598_2023_48330_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c979/10703912/435e1b2d49bd/41598_2023_48330_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c979/10703912/379703e81101/41598_2023_48330_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c979/10703912/435e1b2d49bd/41598_2023_48330_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c979/10703912/379703e81101/41598_2023_48330_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the stratify scale for the prediction of falls among hospitalized adults in a tertiary hospital in Colombia: a retrospective cohort study.验证分层量表在预测哥伦比亚一家三级医院住院成人跌倒中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):21640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48330-y.
2
Relationship between occurrence of falls and fall-risk scores in an acute care setting using the Hendrich II fall risk model.在急性护理环境中使用亨德里希二世跌倒风险模型时跌倒发生率与跌倒风险评分之间的关系。
Medsurg Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;22(3):180-7.
3
Fall prevention: is the STRATIFY tool the right instrument in Italian Hospital inpatient? A retrospective observational study.跌倒预防:STRATIFY工具是否是意大利医院住院患者的合适工具?一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 15;17(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2583-7.
4
Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study.STRATIFY和唐顿工具对评估住院急性护理患者跌倒风险的诊断有效性:一项多中心纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3.
5
Validation and inter-rater reliability of a three item falls risk screening tool.验证和三项跌倒风险筛查工具的组内信度。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0669-z.
6
Comparison of the predictive validity of three fall risk assessment tools and analysis of fall-risk factors at a tertiary teaching hospital.三种跌倒风险评估工具的预测效度比较及某三级教学医院跌倒风险因素分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Sep;29(17-18):3482-3493. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15387. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the STRATIFY tool for prediction of falls in hospital patients: how well does it work?一项使用STRATIFY工具预测住院患者跌倒的研究的系统评价和荟萃分析:该工具的效果如何?
Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):621-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn203. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Evaluation of the "medication fall risk score".“药物跌倒风险评分”的评估
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):e32-e39. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150745. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
Evaluation of the STRATIFY falls prediction tool on a geriatric unit.在老年病房对STRATIFY跌倒预测工具的评估。
Outcomes Manag. 2003 Jan-Mar;7(1):8-14; quiz 15-6.
10
A predictive model for fall risk in hospitalized adults: A case-control study.住院成年人跌倒风险预测模型:病例对照研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Mar;75(3):563-572. doi: 10.1111/jan.13882. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a rapid predictive model for falls in older hospitalized patients.为老年住院患者开发快速跌倒预测模型。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1421078. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421078. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective cohort study of factors associated with severity of falls in hospital patients.医院患者跌倒严重程度相关因素的回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 18;12(1):12266. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16403-z.
2
[Review of the validity of fall risk assessment scales in hospitalised patients].[住院患者跌倒风险评估量表的有效性综述]
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2022 May-Jun;57(3):186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
Interventions to reduce falls in hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医院跌倒干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2022 May 1;51(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac077.
4
Fall prevention in hospitals and nursing homes: Clinical practice guideline.医院和养老院的跌倒预防:临床实践指南。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Apr;19(2):86-93. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12571. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
5
Hospital performance comparison of inpatient fall rates; the impact of risk adjusting for patient-related factors: a multicentre cross-sectional survey.医院住院患者跌倒率的绩效比较;对患者相关因素进行风险调整的影响:一项多中心横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07638-7.
6
Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review.跌倒风险评估量表:一项系统文献综述
Nurs Rep. 2021 Jun 2;11(2):430-443. doi: 10.3390/nursrep11020041.
7
The epidemiology of falls in Portugal: An analysis of hospital admission data.葡萄牙跌倒的流行病学:住院数据分析
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 22;16(12):e0261456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261456. eCollection 2021.
8
Falls - the socio-economic and medical aspects important for developing prevention and treatment strategies.跌倒——对于制定预防和治疗策略具有重要社会经济和医学意义。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2021 Sep 16;28(3):391-396. doi: 10.26444/aaem/122409. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Hospital Inpatient Falls across Clinical Departments.医院各临床科室住院患者跌倒情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 2;18(15):8167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158167.
10
Validation of nursing documentation regarding in-hospital falls: a cohort study.关于住院患者跌倒护理记录的验证:一项队列研究。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Apr 9;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00577-4.