Department of Social and Health Sciences in Sport Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Institute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):2450. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17366-0.
Living in urban environments is associated with several health risks (e.g., noise, and air pollution). However, there are also beneficial aspects such as various opportunities for social activities, which might increase levels of social participation and (physically) active mobility that in turn have positive effects on health and well-being. However, how aspects of the environment, active mobility, and social participation are associated is not well established. This study investigates the moderating effect of low vs. high walkability neighborhoods on the associations between active mobility, and social participation and integrates individuals' subjective perception of the neighborhood environment they are living in.
Cross-sectional data from 219 adults (48% female, mean age = 46 ± 3.8 years) from 12 urban neighborhoods (six low, six high walkability) were analyzed: First, social participation, active mobility, and subjective neighborhood perceptions were compared between people living in a low vs. high walkability neighborhood via t-tests. Second, multigroup path analyses were computed to explore potential differences in the associations between these variables in low vs. high walkability neighborhoods.
Social participation, active mobility, and subjective neighborhood perceptions didn't differ in low vs. high walkability neighborhoods (p: 0.37 - 0.71). Active mobility and subjective neighborhood perceptions were significantly stronger related to social participation in low vs. high walkability neighborhoods (active mobility in low: ß = 0.35, p < .01 vs. high: ß = 0.09, p = .36; subjective neighborhood perceptions in low: ß = 0.27, p < .01 vs. high: ß = 0.15, p = .18).
Despite living in neighborhoods with objectively different walkability, participants rated social participation and active mobility equally and perceived their neighborhoods similarly. However, zooming into the interrelations of these variables reveals that social participation of residents from low walkability neighborhoods depends stronger on active mobility and perceiving the environment positively. Positive perceptions of the environment and active mobility might buffer the objectively worse walkability. Future research should focus on underlying mechanisms and determinants of subjective neighborhood perceptions and active mobility, especially in low walkability neighborhoods.
生活在城市环境中与多种健康风险相关(例如,噪音和空气污染)。然而,城市环境也有有益的方面,例如各种社交活动的机会,这可能会增加社交参与度和(身体)积极的流动性,进而对健康和幸福感产生积极影响。然而,环境、积极流动性和社交参与的各个方面是如何相关的尚不清楚。本研究调查了低步行性和高步行性社区对积极流动性和社交参与之间关联的调节作用,并整合了个体对其居住的社区环境的主观感知。
来自 12 个城市社区(6 个低步行性,6 个高步行性)的 219 名成年人(48%为女性,平均年龄为 46 ± 3.8 岁)的横断面数据进行了分析:首先,通过 t 检验比较居住在低步行性和高步行性社区的人之间的社交参与度、积极流动性和主观社区感知。其次,计算多组路径分析以探索低步行性和高步行性社区中这些变量之间关联的潜在差异。
低步行性和高步行性社区之间的社交参与度、积极流动性和主观社区感知没有差异(p:0.37 - 0.71)。在低步行性和高步行性社区中,积极流动性和主观社区感知与社交参与的关系更为密切(低步行性:β = 0.35,p < 0.01 与高步行性:β = 0.09,p = 0.36;低步行性:β = 0.27,p < 0.01 与高步行性:β = 0.15,p = 0.18)。
尽管居住在具有客观不同步行性的社区中,参与者对社交参与度和积极流动性的评价相同,对其社区的感知也相似。然而,深入研究这些变量之间的相互关系表明,低步行性社区居民的社交参与更多地取决于积极流动性和对环境的积极感知。对环境的积极感知和积极流动性可能会缓解客观上较差的步行性。未来的研究应侧重于主观社区感知和积极流动性的潜在机制和决定因素,特别是在低步行性社区。