• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅使用医疗补助(Medicaid-only)和双重资格(Dual-Eligible)的死者中,在使用临终关怀方面的种族和民族差异。

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use Among Medicaid-Only and Dual-Eligible Decedents.

机构信息

UConn Health, Center on Aging, Farmington, Connecticut.

Connecticut Department of Social Services, Hartford, Connecticut.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e234240. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4240.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4240
PMID:38064239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10709774/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Hospice care enhances quality of life for people with terminal illness and is most beneficial with longer length of stay (LOS). Most hospice research focuses on the Medicare-insured population. Little is known about hospice use for the racially and ethnically diverse, low-income Medicaid population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare hospice use and hospice LOS by race and ethnicity among Medicaid-only individuals and those with dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid (duals) in the Connecticut Medicaid program who died over a 4-year period.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective population-based cohort study used Medicaid and traditional Medicare enrollment and claims data for 2015 to 2020. The study included Connecticut Medicaid recipients with at least 1 of 5 most common hospice diagnoses who died from 2017 to 2020.

EXPOSURE

Race and ethnicity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hospice use (yes/no) and hospice LOS (1-7 days vs ≥8 days.) Covariates included sex, age, and nursing facility stay within 60 days of death.

RESULTS

Overall, 2407 and 23 857 duals were included. Medicaid-only decedents were younger (13.8% ≥85 vs 52.5%), more likely to be male (50.6% vs 36.4%), more racially and ethnically diverse (48.7% non-Hispanic White vs 79.9%), and less likely to have a nursing facility stay (34.9% vs 56.1%). Race and ethnicity were significantly associated with hospice use and LOS in both populations: non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic decedents had lower odds of using hospice than non-Hispanic White decedents, and Hispanic decedents had higher odds of a short LOS. In both populations, older age and female sex were also associated with more hospice use. For duals only, higher age was associated with lower odds of short LOS. For decedents with nursing facility stays, compared with those without, Medicaid-only decedents had higher odds of using hospice (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.24-1.78); duals had lower odds (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.63). Compared with decedents without nursing facility stays, duals with a nursing facility stay had higher odds of short LOS (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.43-2.85).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Findings raise concerns about equity and timing of access to hospice for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black individuals in these understudied Medicaid populations. Knowledge about, access to, and acceptance of hospice may be lacking for these low-income individuals. Further research is needed to understand barriers to and facilitators of hospice use for people with nursing facility stays.

摘要

重要性

临终关怀可提高绝症患者的生活质量,且入住时间(LOS)越长越有益。大多数临终关怀研究都集中在有医疗保险的人群上。对于种族和民族多样化、低收入的医疗补助人群,临终关怀的使用情况知之甚少。

目的

在康涅狄格州医疗补助计划中,比较仅接受医疗补助和同时有医疗保险和医疗补助资格(双重资格)的个人在四年期间的种族和民族之间的临终关怀使用情况和临终关怀 LOS。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性基于人群的队列研究,使用了 2015 年至 2020 年的医疗补助和传统医疗保险登记和索赔数据。研究纳入了至少有 5 种最常见临终关怀诊断之一的康涅狄格州医疗补助受助人,这些受助人在 2017 年至 2020 年期间死亡。

暴露

种族和民族。

主要结局和措施

临终关怀的使用(是/否)和临终关怀 LOS(1-7 天与≥8 天)。协变量包括性别、年龄和死亡前 60 天内的护理院停留情况。

结果

总体而言,纳入了 2407 名双重资格和 23857 名仅接受医疗补助的死者。仅接受医疗补助的死者年龄更小(13.8%≥85 岁 vs 52.5%),更可能为男性(50.6% vs 36.4%),种族和民族更为多样化(48.7%非西班牙裔白人 vs 79.9%),且护理院停留的可能性更小(34.9% vs 56.1%)。在两个群体中,种族和民族与临终关怀的使用和 LOS 显著相关:非西班牙裔黑人死者和西班牙裔死者使用临终关怀的可能性低于非西班牙裔白人死者,而西班牙裔死者的 LOS 较短。在两个群体中,年龄较大和女性也与更多的临终关怀使用相关。仅对双重资格者而言,年龄较大与较短 LOS 的可能性降低相关。对于有护理院停留的死者,与没有护理院停留的死者相比,仅接受医疗补助的死者使用临终关怀的可能性更高(优势比 [OR],1.49;95%CI,1.24-1.78);双重资格者的可能性较低(OR,0.60;95%CI,0.57-0.63)。与没有护理院停留的死者相比,有护理院停留的双重资格者 LOS 较短的可能性更高(OR,2.63;95%CI,2.43-2.85)。

结论和相关性

研究结果令人担忧,在这些研究较少的医疗补助人群中,西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑人个人获得临终关怀的机会和时间存在公平性问题。这些低收入人群可能对临终关怀的了解、获得和接受程度较低。需要进一步研究以了解有护理院停留的人使用临终关怀的障碍和促进因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a97/10709774/e18b6c17b6b2/jamahealthforum-e234240-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a97/10709774/e18b6c17b6b2/jamahealthforum-e234240-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a97/10709774/e18b6c17b6b2/jamahealthforum-e234240-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use Among Medicaid-Only and Dual-Eligible Decedents.仅使用医疗补助(Medicaid-only)和双重资格(Dual-Eligible)的死者中,在使用临终关怀方面的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e234240. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4240.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Use and Access Associated With Loss of Medicaid Supplemental Insurance Eligibility Above the Federal Poverty Level.医疗保健使用和获得方面的种族和族裔差异与超过联邦贫困水平的医疗补助补充保险资格丧失有关。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):534-543. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0512.
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
Coverage Gaps and Contraceptive Use Among Medicare Enrollees With Disabilities.医疗保险参保残疾人群体中的保险覆盖缺口与避孕措施使用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517718. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17718.
8
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
Receipt of Buprenorphine and Naltrexone for Opioid Use Disorder by Race and Ethnicity and Insurance Type.按种族、民族和保险类型划分的丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮用于阿片类物质使用障碍的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2518493. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18493.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Acute Transition to Home With Supportive Care (PATHS): A Novel Nurse Practitioner-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve End-of-Life Oncology Care.急性后期过渡到居家支持性护理(PATHS):一种由执业护士主导的新型远程医疗干预措施,旨在改善临终肿瘤护理。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 May;69(5):496-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Specialty palliative care use among cancer patients: A population-based study.癌症患者中专科姑息治疗的使用情况:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0313732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313732. eCollection 2025.
3
Evolution in Documented Goals of Care at End of Life for Adolescents and Younger Adults With Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Reforming the Medicare Hospice Benefit-Unintended Consequences.改革医疗保险临终关怀福利——意外后果
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Aug 4;4(8):e233532. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3532.
2
Hospice-The Time Is Now for Additional Integrity Oversight.临终关怀——现在是加强诚信监督的时候了。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 May 5;4(5):e232045. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2045.
3
2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2023 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
癌症青少年及年轻成人临终关怀记录目标的演变
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2450489. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.50489.
4
Errors in Table 2 and Table 4.表2和表4中的错误。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240409. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0409.
5
Errors in the Abstract Results and Table.摘要、结果及表格中的错误。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jan 5;5(1):e235350. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5350.
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Apr;19(4):1598-1695. doi: 10.1002/alz.13016. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
4
Comparison of the Pathway to Hospice Enrollment Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.比较医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险的临终关怀入院途径。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Feb 3;4(2):e225457. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5457.
5
Carving in Hospice to Medicare Advantage-Potential Unintended Consequences.临终关怀向医疗保险优势计划的转变——潜在的意外后果。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 2;2(7):e212269. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2269.
6
Hospice Referral in Advanced Cancer in New Jersey.新泽西州晚期癌症患者的临终关怀转诊。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Jun 1;24(3):167-174. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000845. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
Association of Prognostic Understanding With Health Care Use Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.预后认知与老年晚期癌症患者医疗保健利用的关联:一项集群随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0018.
8
Interventions to Improve Prognostic Understanding in Advanced Stages of Life-Limiting Illness: A Systematic Review.干预措施以改善生命终末期严重疾病患者的预后理解:系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Feb;63(2):e212-e223. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Changing Institutional Culture Around Hospice Using LEAN Tools to Improve Hospice Utilization in a Veteran Population.利用精益工具改变临终关怀机构文化,提高退伍军人人群的临终关怀利用率。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Oct;62(4):836-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Dying Poor in the US-Disparities in End-of-Life Care.美国贫困者临终时的情况——临终关怀中的差异
JAMA. 2021 Feb 2;325(5):423-424. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26162.