Torres-de la Roche Luz Angela, Acevedo-Mesa Angélica, Lizarazo Ingrid Lizeth, Devassy Rajesh, Becker Sven, Krentel Harald, De Wilde Rudy Leon
University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius Hospital, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany.
University Hospital for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 28;15(23):5624. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235624.
This study aims to summarize evidence from observational studies about the lifetime use of HC and the risk of BC in women of reproductive age. The PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were searched for observational studies published from 2015 to February 2022. Meta-analyses were performed using adjusted odds ratios and relative risks with a random-effects model using the I statistic to quantify the heterogeneity among studies. Of the 724 studies identified, 650 were screened for title/abstract selection, 60 were selected for full-text revision, and 22 were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 19 were case-control studies and 3 were cohort studies. The results of the meta-analysis indicate a significantly higher risk of developing BC in ever users of HC (pooled OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.49). This effect is larger in the subgroups of case-control studies (pooled OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.70) and in the subgroup of studies that strictly define menopausal status (pooled OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.00). Although our meta-analysis of observational studies (cohort and case-control) suggests a significantly increased overall risk of BC in users or ever-users of modern hormonal contraceptives, the high heterogeneity among studies (>70%) related to differences in study design, measurement of variables, confounders, among other factors, as well as publication biases should be considered when interpreting our results.
本研究旨在总结观察性研究中有关育龄女性使用激素避孕药(HC)的终生暴露情况及其患乳腺癌(BC)风险的证据。检索了PubMed、Cochrane和EMBASE数据库中2015年至2022年2月发表的观察性研究。采用随机效应模型,使用I统计量对研究间的异质性进行量化,通过调整后的优势比和相对风险进行荟萃分析。在识别出的724项研究中,650项进行了标题/摘要筛选,60项被选作全文修订,22项纳入荟萃分析。其中,19项为病例对照研究,3项为队列研究。荟萃分析结果表明,曾经使用过HC的女性患BC的风险显著更高(合并优势比=1.33;95%置信区间=1.19至1.49)。在病例对照研究亚组(合并优势比=1.44,95%置信区间=1.21至1.70)以及严格定义绝经状态的研究亚组(合并优势比=1.48;95%置信区间,1.10至2.00)中,这种效应更大。尽管我们对观察性研究(队列研究和病例对照研究)的荟萃分析表明,现代激素避孕药使用者或曾经使用者患BC的总体风险显著增加,但在解释我们的结果时,应考虑到研究间较高的异质性(>70%),这与研究设计、变量测量、混杂因素等方面的差异以及发表偏倚有关。