• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心力衰竭相关心源性休克:ISHLT 共识会议内容摘要。

Heart failure related cardiogenic shock: An ISHLT consensus conference content summary.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute at Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Feb;43(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.014. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.014
PMID:38069920
Abstract

In recent years, there have been significant advancements in the understanding, risk-stratification, and treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). Despite improved pharmacologic and device-based therapies for CS, short-term mortality remains as high as 50%. Most recent efforts in research have focused on CS related to acute myocardial infarction, even though heart failure related CS (HF-CS) accounts for >50% of CS cases. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to support standardized clinical practices in approach to HF-CS. In addition, there is an unmet need to identify disease-specific diagnostic and risk-stratification strategies upon admission, which might ultimately guide the choice of therapies, and thereby improve outcomes and optimize resource allocation. The heterogeneity in defining CS, patient phenotypes, treatment goals and therapies has resulted in difficulty comparing published reports and standardized treatment algorithms. An International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus conference was organized to better define, diagnose, and manage HF-CS. There were 54 participants (advanced heart failure and interventional cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, critical care cardiologists, intensivists, pharmacists, and allied health professionals), with vast clinical and published experience in CS, representing 42 centers worldwide. State-of-the-art HF-CS presentations occurred with subsequent breakout sessions planned in an attempt to reach consensus on various issues, including but not limited to models of CS care delivery, patient presentations in HF-CS, and strategies in HF-CS management. This consensus report summarizes the contemporary literature review on HF-CS presented in the first half of the conference (part 1), while the accompanying document (part 2) covers the breakout sessions where the previously agreed upon clinical issues were discussed with an aim to get to a consensus.

摘要

近年来,人们对心源性休克(CS)的认识、风险分层和治疗方法有了重大进展。尽管 CS 的药物和器械治疗有所改善,但短期死亡率仍高达 50%。最近的研究工作主要集中在心梗相关的 CS 上,尽管心衰相关 CS(HF-CS)占 CS 病例的 50%以上。在 HF-CS 的治疗方法方面,缺乏支持标准化临床实践的高质量证据。此外,需要确定入院时针对特定疾病的诊断和风险分层策略,这可能最终指导治疗方法的选择,从而改善预后并优化资源分配。CS 的定义、患者表型、治疗目标和治疗方法的异质性导致难以比较已发表的报告和标准化治疗算法。国际心肺移植协会(ISHLT)组织了一次共识会议,以更好地定义、诊断和管理 HF-CS。共有 54 名参与者(心力衰竭和介入心脏病专家、心胸外科医生、心脏重症监护专家、重症监护医师、药剂师和相关健康专业人员)参加了会议,他们在 CS 方面具有广泛的临床和发表经验,代表了全球 42 个中心。会议首先介绍了心衰相关 CS 的最新研究成果,随后进行了分组讨论,旨在就各种问题达成共识,包括但不限于 CS 护理模式、HF-CS 患者表现以及 HF-CS 管理策略。本共识报告总结了会议上介绍的 HF-CS 的当代文献综述(第 1 部分),而随附的文件(第 2 部分)涵盖了分组讨论,这些讨论旨在就先前商定的临床问题达成共识。

相似文献

1
Heart failure related cardiogenic shock: An ISHLT consensus conference content summary.心力衰竭相关心源性休克:ISHLT 共识会议内容摘要。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Feb;43(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.014. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
2
Consensus statements from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus conference: Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.国际心肺移植学会共识会议的共识声明:心力衰竭相关性心原性休克。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Feb;43(2):204-216. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
3
Clinical Outcomes Associated With Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Heart Failure Related Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭相关性心原性休克应用急性机械循环支持的临床转归。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 May;14(5):e007924. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007924. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis.因心原性休克转至三级医疗中心治疗的患者的结局:心原性休克工作组分析。
J Card Fail. 2024 Apr;30(4):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
5
Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭和心源性休克的临床特征和住院过程。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
6
Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management Considerations: Review of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭相关性心源性休克:病理生理学、评估与管理考量:心力衰竭相关性心源性休克综述
J Card Fail. 2021 Oct;27(10):1126-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.010.
7
In-hospital and long-term outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction versus heart failure.心肌梗死后并发心原性休克与心力衰竭的院内和长期结局。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Jul;26(7):1594-1603. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3333. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
8
De Novo vs Acute-on-Chronic Presentations of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.心力衰竭相关性心源性休克的急性发作与新发表现:来自重症心脏病学试验网络注册中心的见解。
J Card Fail. 2021 Oct;27(10):1073-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.014.
9
Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock.急性心力衰竭与慢性心力衰竭急性发作及心源性休克的结局差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):1118-1124. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12670. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
Update on cardiogenic shock: from detection to team management.心源性休克最新进展:从检测到团队管理
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;38(2):108-115. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001017. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of early use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in cardiogenic shock: a propensity score-matched analysis.心源性休克中早期使用盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂的安全性和有效性:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02741-1.
2
Impact of therapeutic hypothermia on cardiogenic shock outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗性低温对心源性休克结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01541-0.
3
Hemoglobin in cardiogenic shock: the lower, the poorer survival.
心源性休克中的血红蛋白:水平越低,生存率越低。
J Intensive Care. 2025 Jun 23;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00805-y.
4
The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support in heart failure.临时机械循环支持在心力衰竭中的作用。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Feb 4;27(Suppl 4):iv39-iv46. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf002. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Phase-of-care mortality assessment in cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure.终末期心力衰竭所致心源性休克的护理阶段死亡率评估
JHLT Open. 2024 Mar 2;4:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100077. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Clinical profile, short and long-term outcomes of non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock: A FRENSHOCK sub-analysis.非缺血性心源性休克的临床特征、短期和长期结局:FRENSHOCK亚组分析
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):2335-2346. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15046. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
7
Blueprint for Building and Sustaining a Cardiogenic Shock Program: Qualitative Survey of 12 US Programs.建立和维持心源性休克治疗项目的蓝图:对美国12个项目的定性调查
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Oct 17;3(11):102288. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102288. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Safety and efficacy of up to 60 h of iv istaroxime in pre-cardiogenic shock patients: Design of the SEISMiC trial.静脉注射伊伐雷定长达60小时对心源性休克前期患者的安全性和有效性:SEISMiC试验设计
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):189-198. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15102. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
9
Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies.心源性休克管理进展综述:从急救方案到长期治疗策略
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4841. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164841.
10
The Role of Prognostic Scores in Assessing the Prognosis of Patients Admitted in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Emphasis on Heart Failure Patients.预后评分在评估心脏重症监护病房收治患者预后中的作用:重点关注心力衰竭患者。
J Clin Med. 2024 May 19;13(10):2982. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102982.