• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Phase-of-care mortality assessment in cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure.终末期心力衰竭所致心源性休克的护理阶段死亡率评估
JHLT Open. 2024 Mar 2;4:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100077. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.高容量 Impella 轴流泵支持下心源性休克患者的临床结局:心源性休克工作组的报告。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
3
Clinical Outcomes Associated With Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Heart Failure Related Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭相关性心原性休克应用急性机械循环支持的临床转归。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 May;14(5):e007924. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007924. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
How does protocolization improve outcomes in cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure?规范化治疗如何改善终末期心力衰竭导致的心源性休克的预后?
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Dec 15;369:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.07.045. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
5
Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock.急性心力衰竭与慢性心力衰竭急性发作及心源性休克的结局差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):1118-1124. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12670. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
Temporary mechanical circulatory support utilization and outcomes in cardiogenic shock phenotypes: A comparative analysis of heart failure and acute myocardial infarction.心源性休克不同表型中临时机械循环支持的应用及结局:心力衰竭与急性心肌梗死的比较分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Jan 20. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.01.007.
7
Bridge to durable left ventricular assist device for refractory cardiogenic shock.桥接至耐用型左心室辅助装置治疗难治性心原性休克。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):752-762.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.085. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.接受临时机械循环支持的心源性休克患者的预后
JACC Asia. 2022 Oct 31;3(1):122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭和心源性休克的临床特征和住院过程。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
10
Patient Characteristics, Management and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock at a Large Safety Net Hospital.大型安全网医院心源休克患者的特征、管理及长期预后
Am J Cardiol. 2025 May 1;242:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.021. Epub 2025 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart failure related cardiogenic shock: An ISHLT consensus conference content summary.心力衰竭相关心源性休克:ISHLT 共识会议内容摘要。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Feb;43(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.014. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
2
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.体外生命支持在与梗死相关的心原性休克中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 5;389(14):1286-1297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307227. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
3
How does protocolization improve outcomes in cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure?规范化治疗如何改善终末期心力衰竭导致的心源性休克的预后?
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Dec 15;369:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.07.045. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock.标准化的以团队为基础的心源性休克治疗方案。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 9;73(13):1659-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.084.
5
The burden of haemocompatibility with left ventricular assist systems: a complex weave.左心室辅助系统的血液相容性负担:一个复杂的交织情况。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Feb 21;40(8):673-677. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx036.
6
A method to evaluate cardiac surgery mortality: phase of care mortality analysis.一种评估心脏外科手术死亡率的方法:围手术期死亡率分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jan;93(1):36-43; discussion 43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.07.057. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

终末期心力衰竭所致心源性休克的护理阶段死亡率评估

Phase-of-care mortality assessment in cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure.

作者信息

Lim Hoong Sern, Mascaro Jorge

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

JHLT Open. 2024 Mar 2;4:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100077. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100077
PMID:40144249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935383/
Abstract

End-stage heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) is associated with high risk of short-term mortality, but the causes and mode of death in HF-CS have not been described. This study aimed to (i) describe the causes/modes of death in patients with HF-CS based on the phases-of-care (Rescue-Optimization-Stabilization-Exit therapy), analogous to the phase-of-care mortality analysis, and (ii) assess the impact of the introduction of a standardized team-based care. We included 120 consecutive patients with HF-CS who underwent temporary mechanical circulatory support. The introduction of standardized team-based care reduced mortality at 6 months (36/63 (57%) vs 17/57 (30%),  = 0.003), but did not alter the distribution of phase-of-care mortality. There were fewer deaths following heart transplantation/left ventricular assist device therapy with standardized team-based care (6% vs 28%,  = 0.067) may be clinically relevant.

摘要

终末期心力衰竭相关的心源性休克(HF-CS)与短期死亡的高风险相关,但HF-CS的死因和死亡方式尚未得到描述。本研究旨在:(i)基于照护阶段(抢救-优化-稳定-出院治疗)描述HF-CS患者的死因/死亡方式,类似于照护阶段死亡率分析;(ii)评估引入标准化团队照护的影响。我们纳入了120例接受临时机械循环支持的连续性HF-CS患者。引入标准化团队照护降低了6个月时的死亡率(63例中的36例(57%)对比57例中的17例(30%),P = 0.003),但并未改变照护阶段死亡率的分布。在接受心脏移植/左心室辅助装置治疗时,标准化团队照护下的死亡人数较少(6%对比28%,P = 0.067),这可能具有临床意义。