Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e077378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077378.
Strengthening of emergency care systems, including prehospital systems, can reduce death and disability. We aimed to identify perspectives on barriers and facilitators relating to the development and implementation of a prehospital emergency care system assessment tool (PEC-SET) from prehospital providers representing several South and Southeast (SE) Asian countries.
We conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGD) informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). FGDs were conducted in English, audioconferencing/videoconferencing was recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded using an inductive and deductive approach. Participants suggested specific elements to be measured within three main 'pillars' of disease conditions proposed by the research team of the tool being developed (cardiovascular, trauma and perinatal emergencies).
We explored the perspectives of medical directors in six low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in South and SE Asia.
A total of 16 participants were interviewed (1 Vietnam, 4 Philippines, 4 Thailand, 5 Malaysia, 1 Indonesia and 1 Pakistan) as a part of 4 focus groups.
Themes identified within the four CFIR constructs included: (1) Intervention characteristics: importance of developing an contextually specific tool, need for generalisability, trialling in one geographical area or with one pillar before expanding; (2) Inner setting: data transfer barriers, workforce shortages; (3) Outer setting: underdevelopment of EMS nationally; need for further EMS system development prior to implementing a tool and (4) Individual characteristics: lack of buy-in by prehospital personnel. Elements proposed by participants included both process and outcome measures.
Through the CFIR framework, we identified several themes which can provide a basis for codeveloping a PEC-SET for LMICs with local stakeholders. This work may inform development of quality improvement tools in LMIC PEC systems.
加强包括院前系统在内的紧急医疗服务系统可以降低死亡和残疾风险。我们旨在确定来自代表几个南亚和东南亚(SE)国家的院前提供者对开发和实施院前紧急医疗服务系统评估工具(PEC-SET)的障碍和促进因素的看法。
我们使用焦点小组讨论(FGD)进行了一项定性研究,该研究以实施研究综合框架(CFIR)为指导。FGD 以英语进行,使用音频会议/视频会议进行记录,逐字转录并使用归纳和演绎方法进行编码。参与者建议在该工具研究团队提出的三个主要“支柱”(心血管、创伤和围产期急症)内测量具体要素。
我们探讨了来自南亚和东南亚 6 个低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的医疗主任的观点。
作为 4 个焦点小组的一部分,共有 16 名参与者(1 名越南人、4 名菲律宾人、4 名泰国人、5 名马来西亚人、1 名印度尼西亚人和 1 名巴基斯坦人)接受了采访。
在 CFIR 的四个构建模块中确定了以下主题:(1)干预特征:开发具有特定背景的工具的重要性、普遍性的需求、在一个地理区域或一个支柱上试用后再扩展的需要;(2)内部环境:数据传输障碍、劳动力短缺;(3)外部环境:国家 EMS 发展不足;在实施工具之前需要进一步发展 EMS 系统,以及(4)个人特征:院前人员缺乏认同。参与者提出的要素包括过程和结果衡量标准。
通过 CFIR 框架,我们确定了几个主题,这些主题可以为与当地利益相关者共同开发适合 LMIC 的 PEC-SET 提供基础。这项工作可以为 LMIC PEC 系统的质量改进工具的开发提供信息。