Suppr超能文献

在资源匮乏的环境下开发院前急救护理系统评估工具(PEC-SET)的障碍和促进因素:定性分析。

Barriers and facilitators for developing a prehospital emergency care system evaluation tool (PEC-SET) for low-resource settings: a qualitative analysis.

机构信息

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e077378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077378.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Strengthening of emergency care systems, including prehospital systems, can reduce death and disability. We aimed to identify perspectives on barriers and facilitators relating to the development and implementation of a prehospital emergency care system assessment tool (PEC-SET) from prehospital providers representing several South and Southeast (SE) Asian countries.

DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGD) informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). FGDs were conducted in English, audioconferencing/videoconferencing was recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded using an inductive and deductive approach. Participants suggested specific elements to be measured within three main 'pillars' of disease conditions proposed by the research team of the tool being developed (cardiovascular, trauma and perinatal emergencies).

SETTING

We explored the perspectives of medical directors in six low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in South and SE Asia.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 16 participants were interviewed (1 Vietnam, 4 Philippines, 4 Thailand, 5 Malaysia, 1 Indonesia and 1 Pakistan) as a part of 4 focus groups.

RESULTS

Themes identified within the four CFIR constructs included: (1) Intervention characteristics: importance of developing an contextually specific tool, need for generalisability, trialling in one geographical area or with one pillar before expanding; (2) Inner setting: data transfer barriers, workforce shortages; (3) Outer setting: underdevelopment of EMS nationally; need for further EMS system development prior to implementing a tool and (4) Individual characteristics: lack of buy-in by prehospital personnel. Elements proposed by participants included both process and outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the CFIR framework, we identified several themes which can provide a basis for codeveloping a PEC-SET for LMICs with local stakeholders. This work may inform development of quality improvement tools in LMIC PEC systems.

摘要

目的

加强包括院前系统在内的紧急医疗服务系统可以降低死亡和残疾风险。我们旨在确定来自代表几个南亚和东南亚(SE)国家的院前提供者对开发和实施院前紧急医疗服务系统评估工具(PEC-SET)的障碍和促进因素的看法。

设计

我们使用焦点小组讨论(FGD)进行了一项定性研究,该研究以实施研究综合框架(CFIR)为指导。FGD 以英语进行,使用音频会议/视频会议进行记录,逐字转录并使用归纳和演绎方法进行编码。参与者建议在该工具研究团队提出的三个主要“支柱”(心血管、创伤和围产期急症)内测量具体要素。

设置

我们探讨了来自南亚和东南亚 6 个低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的医疗主任的观点。

参与者

作为 4 个焦点小组的一部分,共有 16 名参与者(1 名越南人、4 名菲律宾人、4 名泰国人、5 名马来西亚人、1 名印度尼西亚人和 1 名巴基斯坦人)接受了采访。

结果

在 CFIR 的四个构建模块中确定了以下主题:(1)干预特征:开发具有特定背景的工具的重要性、普遍性的需求、在一个地理区域或一个支柱上试用后再扩展的需要;(2)内部环境:数据传输障碍、劳动力短缺;(3)外部环境:国家 EMS 发展不足;在实施工具之前需要进一步发展 EMS 系统,以及(4)个人特征:院前人员缺乏认同。参与者提出的要素包括过程和结果衡量标准。

结论

通过 CFIR 框架,我们确定了几个主题,这些主题可以为与当地利益相关者共同开发适合 LMIC 的 PEC-SET 提供基础。这项工作可以为 LMIC PEC 系统的质量改进工具的开发提供信息。

相似文献

4
Emergency Medical Services Leadership Perspectives on Implementation of Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Qualitative Study.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(7):946-954. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2128484. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
8
Using the South African Triage Scale for prehospital triage: a qualitative study.
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00522-3.
9
EMS Systems in Lower-Middle Income Countries: A Literature Review.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Feb;32(1):64-70. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1600114X. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
10
Understanding safety in prehospital emergency medical services for children.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):350-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.869640. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2023.
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 May;32(5):553-569. doi: 10.1111/acem.70012. Epub 2025 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an emergency medical services system in Thailand: Roles of the universal health coverage and the national lead agency.
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Aug;33(4):756-758. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13794. Epub 2021 May 12.
2
Issues and Challenges Associated with Data-Sharing in LMICs: Perspectives of Researchers in Thailand.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):528-536. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0651. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research.
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
5
National Assessment of Quality Programs in Emergency Medical Services.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):370-378. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1380094. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS): Rationale and Methodology of an International and Multicenter Trauma Registry.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):58-83. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1347224. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
7
Development and Implementation of a Novel Prehospital Care System in the State of Kerala, India.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Dec;31(6):663-666. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000960. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
8
Trust, Respect, and Reciprocity: Informing Culturally Appropriate Data-Sharing Practice in Vietnam.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):251-63. doi: 10.1177/1556264615592387.
9
Emergency medical services key performance measurement in Asian cities.
Int J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr 23;8:12. doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0062-7. eCollection 2015.
10
Assessment of the status of prehospital care in 13 low- and middle-income countries.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):381-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.664245. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验