Suppr超能文献

患者对正畸保持器的认知:系统评价。

Patients' perception of orthodontic retainers: a systematic review.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Pará, UFPA - Belém, Pará, Brazil.

School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;46(1). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad068.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orthodontic retainers are widely used to prevent relapses after orthodontic treatment; however, evidence about patients' perceptions of retainers is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patients' perception of orthodontic retainers.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, LIVIVO, Cochrane Library, and gray literature (Google Scholar) were searched without date or language restrictions. A manual search of the reference lists of the included articles was also performed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies comparing patients' perceptions of wearing orthodontic retainers were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

According to the study design, the risk of bias (RoB) assessment was performed using RoB 2.0 or ROBINS-I. The level of evidence was assessed through the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. After the RoB assessment, 12 randomized controlled trials presented a high RoB, and 4 non-randomized controlled trials presented a moderate RoB. The certainty of evidence was classified as very low for the four assessed outcomes. The studies generally reported an initial temporary negative impact of orthodontic retainers. Different esthetic, functional, and ease-of-use advantages are reported using removable and fixed retainers. A quantitative analysis was not performed due to the considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence, although very limited, suggests that orthodontic retainers have an initial negative impact related to discomfort and functional limitations, but they seem to regress over time. There is a preference for thermoplastic over Hawley-type retainers. However, thermoplastic retainers cause different functional difficulties, and bonded retainers present the advantage of affecting speech function less than orthodontic removable retainers, although they can facilitate oral hygiene problems.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022306665).

摘要

背景

正畸保持器被广泛用于预防正畸治疗后的复发;然而,缺乏关于患者对保持器认知的证据。

目的

评估患者对正畸保持器的认知。

检索方法

无时间和语言限制地检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、LILACS、LIVIVO、Cochrane 图书馆和灰色文献(Google Scholar)。还对纳入文章的参考文献进行了手动检索。

选择标准

纳入了比较患者佩戴正畸保持器认知的研究。

数据收集和分析

根据研究设计,使用 RoB 2.0 或 ROBINS-I 对偏倚风险(RoB)进行评估。通过 GRADE(推荐、评估、开发和评估分级)工具评估证据水平。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究有 17 项。经过 RoB 评估,12 项随机对照试验呈现高 RoB,4 项非随机对照试验呈现中 RoB。四个评估结果的证据确定性被归类为极低。这些研究通常报告正畸保持器最初会产生暂时的负面影响。使用可摘式和固定式保持器可报告不同的美观、功能和易用性优势。由于研究之间存在很大的临床和方法学异质性,因此未进行定量分析。

结论

尽管目前的证据非常有限,但表明正畸保持器最初会产生与不适和功能限制相关的负面影响,但随着时间的推移,这种影响似乎会消退。与 Hawley 式保持器相比,热塑式保持器具有更多优势。然而,热塑式保持器会引起不同的功能困难,而黏附式保持器对语音功能的影响小于正畸可摘式保持器,尽管它们可能会增加口腔卫生问题。

注册

PROSPERO(CRD42022306665)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验