Liu Fangyu, Peng Yu, Li Qian, Zhang Qianru, Shi Hongyun, Qie Shuai, Zhang Ruohui
Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 22;13:1290434. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1290434. eCollection 2023.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential of the flattening filter free (FFF) mode of a linear accelerator for patients with hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) by comparison with flattened beams (FF) technique in the application of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using dosimetric and radiobiological indexes based on the volume of hippocampus and target.
2 VMAT- and 2 IMRT- plans were optimized in Eclipse planning system with 2 different delivery modes (6 MV standard vs. 6 MV FFF) for each of 25 patients. Dose distributions of the target and organs at risk (OARs), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the hippocampus, monitor units, treatment time and quality assurance results were evaluated to compare the normal and FFF beam characteristics by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test with a significance level of 0.05.
VMAT-FFF provided the significantly best homogeneity and conformity of the target, delivered the lowest dose to hippocampus and the other OARs, and led to the lowest NTCP of the hippocampus among all modalities, which has the potential to alleviate neurocognitive decline after WBRT. IMRT-FFF reduced the dose to the lens with similar dose distributions of the target compared with IMRT-FF, whereas the lower dose to the hippocampus was achieved using the conventional beams. The monitor units were obviously increased by 19.2% for VMAT and 33.8% for IMRT, when FFF beams w ere used. The removal of flattening filter for IMRT resulted in a 26% reduction in treatment time, but VMAT had the similar treatment time for the two modes owing to the limitation of gantry rotation speed. Gamma analysis showed an excellent agreement for all plans at 3%/2 mm, and no statistical differences were found between FF and FFF.
In conclusion, this study suggests that FFF mode is feasible and advantageous in HA-WBRT and VMAT-FFF is the optimal solution in terms of dose distribution of the target, OARs sparing, NTCP of the hippocampus and delivery efficiency compared to the other three techniques. Additionally, the advantages of the FFF technique for VMAT are more prominent in cases with small hippocampal volumes.
本研究旨在通过在容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)和调强放射治疗(IMRT)中应用基于海马体和靶区体积的剂量学和放射生物学指标,将直线加速器的无均整器(FFF)模式与均整束(FF)技术进行比较,以评估其在海马体避让全脑放疗(HA-WBRT)患者中的应用潜力。
在Eclipse治疗计划系统中,针对25例患者中的每例,采用2种不同的射束模式(6 MV标准射束与6 MV FFF)优化2个VMAT计划和2个IMRT计划。评估靶区和危及器官(OARs)的剂量分布、海马体的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)、监测单位、治疗时间和质量保证结果,通过Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验比较标准射束和FFF射束的特性,显著性水平设定为0.05。
VMAT-FFF在所有模式中提供了最佳的靶区均匀性和适形性,对海马体和其他OARs的剂量最低,海马体的NTCP也最低,这有可能减轻WBRT后的神经认知衰退。与IMRT-FF相比,IMRT-FFF降低了晶状体的剂量,靶区剂量分布相似,而使用传统射束可降低海马体的剂量。使用FFF射束时,VMAT的监测单位明显增加了19.2%,IMRT增加了33.8%。IMRT去除均整器使治疗时间减少了26%,但由于机架旋转速度的限制,VMAT两种模式的治疗时间相似。伽马分析显示所有计划在3%/2 mm时一致性良好,FF和FFF之间未发现统计学差异。
总之,本研究表明FFF模式在HA-WBRT中是可行且具有优势的,与其他三种技术相比,VMAT-FFF在靶区剂量分布、OARs保护、海马体NTCP和输送效率方面是最佳解决方案。此外,FFF技术在海马体体积较小的病例中对VMAT的优势更为突出。