• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字乳腺断层合成技术减少老年女性额外检查的能力。

The ability of digital breast tomosynthesis to reduce additional examinations in older women.

作者信息

Gharaibeh Maha, Alfwares Ahmad Abu, Elobeid Eyhab, Khasawneh Ruba, Rousan Liqa, El-Heis Mwaffaq, Al-Jarrah Mooath, Haj Hussein Ahmed A, Altalhi Maryam, Abualigah Laith

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Department of Radiation Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 21;10:1276434. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1276434. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1276434
PMID:38076239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10702740/
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in older women across varying breast densities and to compare its effectiveness for cancer detection with 2D mammography and ultrasound (U/S) for different breast density categories. Furthermore, our study aimed to predict the potential reduction in unnecessary additional examinations among older women due to DBT.

METHODS

This study encompassed a cohort of 224 older women. Each participant underwent both 2D mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis examinations. Supplementary views were conducted when necessary, including spot compression and magnification, ultrasound, and recommended biopsies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for 2D mammography, DBT, and ultrasound. The impact of DBT on diminishing the need for supplementary imaging procedures was predicted through binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

In dense breast tissue, DBT exhibited notably heightened sensitivity and NPV for lesion detection compared to non-dense breasts (61.9% vs. 49.3%, < 0.001) and (72.9% vs. 67.9%, < 0.001), respectively. However, the AUC value of DBT in dense breasts was lower compared with non-dense breasts (0.425 vs. 0.670). Regarding the ability to detect calcifications, DBT demonstrated significantly improved sensitivity and NPV in dense breasts compared to non-dense breasts (100% vs. 99.2%, < 0.001) and (100% vs. 94.7%, < 0.001), respectively. On the other hand, the AUC value of DBT was slightly lower in dense breasts compared with non-dense (0.682 vs. 0.711). Regarding lesion detection for all cases between imaging examinations, the highest sensitivity was observed in 2D mammography (91.7%, < 0.001), followed by DBT (83.7%, < 0.001), and then ultrasound (60.6%, < 0.001). In dense breasts, sensitivity for lesion detection was highest in 2D mammography (92.9%, < 0.001), followed by ultrasound (76.2%, < 0.001), and the last one was DBT. In non-dense breasts, sensitivities were 91% ( < 0.001) for 2D mammography, 50.7% ( < 0.001) for ultrasound, and 49.3% ( < 0.001) for DBT. In terms of calcification detection, DBT displayed significantly superior sensitivity compared to 2D mammography in both dense and non-dense breasts (100% vs. 91.4%, < 0.001) and (99.2% vs. 78.5%, < 0.001), respectively. However, the logistic regression model did not identify any statistically significant relationship ( > 0.05) between DBT and the four dependent variables.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that among older women, DBT does not significantly decrease the requirement for further medical examinations.

摘要

目的

评估数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)在不同乳腺密度的老年女性中的诊断性能,并比较其与二维乳腺X线摄影和超声(U/S)在不同乳腺密度类别中检测癌症的有效性。此外,我们的研究旨在预测DBT可能减少老年女性不必要的额外检查。

方法

本研究纳入了224名老年女性队列。每位参与者均接受了二维乳腺X线摄影和数字乳腺断层合成检查。必要时进行补充检查,包括点压和放大、超声检查以及建议的活检。计算二维乳腺X线摄影、DBT和超声的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和曲线下面积(AUC)。通过二元逻辑回归预测DBT对减少补充成像程序需求的影响。

结果

在致密乳腺组织中,与非致密乳腺相比,DBT在病变检测方面表现出显著更高的灵敏度和NPV(分别为61.9%对49.3%,<0.001)和(72.9%对67.9%,<0.001)。然而,致密乳腺中DBT的AUC值低于非致密乳腺(0.425对0.670)。关于钙化检测能力,与非致密乳腺相比,DBT在致密乳腺中表现出显著提高的灵敏度和NPV(分别为100%对99.2%,<0.001)和(100%对94.7%,<0.001)。另一方面,致密乳腺中DBT的AUC值略低于非致密乳腺(0.682对0.711)。关于所有病例在成像检查之间的病变检测,二维乳腺X线摄影的灵敏度最高(91.7%,<0.001),其次是DBT(83.7%,<0.001),然后是超声(60.6%,<0.001)。在致密乳腺中,病变检测的灵敏度二维乳腺X线摄影最高(92.9%,<0.001),其次是超声(76.2%,<0.001),最后是DBT。在非致密乳腺中,二维乳腺X线摄影的灵敏度为91%(<0.001),超声为50.7%(<0.001),DBT为49.3%(<0.001)。在钙化检测方面,DBT在致密和非致密乳腺中均显示出比二维乳腺X线摄影显著更高的灵敏度(分别为100%对91.4%,<0.001)和(99.2%对78.5%,<0.001)。然而,逻辑回归模型未发现DBT与四个因变量之间存在任何统计学显著关系(>0.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在老年女性中,DBT并未显著降低进一步医学检查的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10702740/49cc808b27c1/fmed-10-1276434-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10702740/71331588ee55/fmed-10-1276434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10702740/49cc808b27c1/fmed-10-1276434-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10702740/71331588ee55/fmed-10-1276434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4b/10702740/49cc808b27c1/fmed-10-1276434-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The ability of digital breast tomosynthesis to reduce additional examinations in older women.数字乳腺断层合成技术减少老年女性额外检查的能力。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 21;10:1276434. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1276434. eCollection 2023.
2
3
4
Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.与数字乳腺断层合成术相比,数字乳腺钼靶筛查与间隔期浸润性和高级别乳腺癌风险的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 14;327(22):2220-2230. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7672.
5
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts.数字化乳腺断层融合超声与数字化乳腺钼靶联合超声在致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查中的应用比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Apr;24(4):274-283. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0649.
6
Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.在接受筛查的致密型乳腺女性中,比较用于乳腺癌检测的简化乳腺 MRI 与数字乳腺断层合成术。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):746-756. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0572.
7
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus MRI as an Adjunct to Full-Field Digital Mammography for Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer according to Mammographic Density.数字乳腺断层合成摄影术与 MRI 作为全数字化乳腺摄影术的辅助手段,用于根据乳腺密度对乳腺癌进行术前评估。
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Nov;23(11):1031-1043. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0967. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
8
Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影在社区实践中对患者年龄、筛查轮次和乳腺密度的筛查性能比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11792.
9
Diagnostic Efficacy across Dense and Non-Dense Breasts during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound Assessment for Recalled Women.数字乳腺断层合成和超声评估对召回女性致密型和非致密型乳腺的诊断效能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;12(6):1477. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061477.
10
Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography.数字乳腺断层合成术对不同人群乳腺可疑钙化灶的诊断性能:与全视野数字乳腺摄影的比较
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018 Dec 20;17:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.12.004. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Diagnostic Efficacy of Four Breast Imaging Modalities in Dense Breasts: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.四种乳腺成像方式对致密型乳腺的诊断效能比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 17;13(7):1750. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071750.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Efficacy across Dense and Non-Dense Breasts during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound Assessment for Recalled Women.数字乳腺断层合成和超声评估对召回女性致密型和非致密型乳腺的诊断效能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;12(6):1477. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061477.
2
Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised mammography versus digital screening mammography for the detection of invasive breast cancer (TOSYMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.数字化乳腺断层合成联合合成乳腺摄影与数字化乳腺筛查摄影用于浸润性乳腺癌检测的比较(TOSYMA):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、对照、优效性试验
Lancet Oncol. 2022 May;23(5):601-611. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00194-2. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
3
Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
欧洲乳腺影像学会(EUSOBI)关于致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查的建议。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):4036-4045. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08617-6. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion.数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)联合与不联合超声与乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)在乳腺病变检测中的对比研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020759.
5
Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.数字乳腺断层合成或数字乳腺摄影评估的乳腺密度比较:乳腺癌监测联盟。
Radiology. 2022 Feb;302(2):286-292. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204579. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography in Older Women.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与乳腺 X 线摄影对老年女性的比较效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1870-1876. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07132-6. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Breast cancer detection: Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis across non-dense and dense breasts.乳腺癌检测:数字化乳腺钼靶摄影与数字化乳腺断层合成在非致密型和致密型乳腺中的比较。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Nov;27(4):1027-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
8
Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.前瞻性基于人群的马尔默乳腺断层合成筛查试验中的间期乳腺癌发生率和肿瘤特征。
Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):559-567. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204106. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
Comparison of Cancers Detected by Screening Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.筛查性乳腺超声与数字乳腺断层合成摄影检出癌症的比较。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Mar;29(3):339-347. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
10
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Update on Technology, Evidence, and Clinical Practice.数字乳腺断层合成技术:技术、证据和临床实践的更新。
Radiographics. 2021 Mar-Apr;41(2):321-337. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200101. Epub 2021 Feb 5.