Golden Sara E, Rubim Felipe, Thammana Rekha, Disher Natalie, Vranas Kelly C, Teno Joan M, Izumi Seiko, Kim Hyunjee, Tjia Jennifer, Sullivan Donald R
Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS), Portland, OR, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
PEC Innov. 2023 Dec 4;3:100241. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100241. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
This study was designed to understand the experience and needs surrounding advance care planning (ACP) discussions for surrogate decision-makers of persons with advanced dementia (PWAD).
Semi-structured qualitative interviews based on end-of-life communication models with a convenience sample of 17 clinicians, and 15 surrogates of PWAD. We used a hybrid approach of deductive and inductive thematic analysis.
Two main themes emerged. 1)Deficits in communication: Often surrogates did not fully comprehend the disease trajectory or medical treatments, like the likelihood of pneumonia and use of mechanical ventilation, nor concepts related to ACP, particularly legal documents and orders such as Do Not Hospitalize, which made decision-making challenging as perceived by clinicians. 2)Decision-making conflicts: Clinicians perceived a disconnect between surrogates' understanding of their loved one's preferences and knowing how or when to operationalize them.
Significant gaps in knowledge surrounding disease trajectory and complications, such as pneumonia, and aspects of ACP, exist. These gaps create decision-making challenges for surrogates and clinicians alike.
This study assessed both clinicians and surrogate decision-makers' perspectives on communication and decision-making concerning care preferences, goals, and ACP. The study findings from a national cohort can inform decision-support interventions for clinicians and surrogate decision-makers of PWAD.
本研究旨在了解晚期痴呆患者(PWAD)的替代决策者围绕预先护理计划(ACP)讨论的经历和需求。
基于临终沟通模型进行半结构化定性访谈,对17名临床医生和15名PWAD的替代决策者进行便利抽样。我们采用了演绎和归纳主题分析的混合方法。
出现了两个主要主题。1)沟通缺陷:替代决策者通常不能完全理解疾病发展轨迹或医疗治疗,如肺炎的可能性和机械通气的使用,也不理解与ACP相关的概念,特别是法律文件和医嘱,如“不要住院”,这使得临床医生认为决策具有挑战性。2)决策冲突:临床医生认为替代决策者对其亲人偏好的理解与知道如何或何时实施这些偏好之间存在脱节。
在疾病发展轨迹和并发症(如肺炎)以及ACP方面存在重大知识差距。这些差距给替代决策者和临床医生都带来了决策挑战。
本研究评估了临床医生和替代决策者在护理偏好、目标和ACP方面的沟通和决策观点。来自全国队列的研究结果可为PWAD的临床医生和替代决策者的决策支持干预提供参考。