Vig Elizabeth K, Starks Helene, Taylor Janelle S, Hopley Elizabeth K, Fryer-Edwards Kelly
Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1274-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0252-y. Epub 2007 Jul 7.
A majority of end-of-life medical decisions are made by surrogate decision-makers who have varying degrees of preparation and comfort with their role. Having a seriously ill family member is stressful for surrogates. Moreover, most clinicians have had little training in working effectively with surrogates.
To better understand the challenges of decision-making from the surrogate's perspective.
Semistructured telephone interview study of the experience of surrogate decision-making.
Fifty designated surrogates with previous decision-making experience.
We asked surrogates to describe and reflect on their experience of making medical decisions for others. After coding transcripts, we conducted a content analysis to identify and categorize factors that made decision-making more or less difficult for surrogates.
Surrogates identified four types of factors: (1) surrogate characteristics and life circumstances (such as coping strategies and competing responsibilities), (2) surrogates' social networks (such as intrafamily discord about the "right" decision), (3) surrogate-patient relationships and communication (such as difficulties with honoring known preferences), and (4) surrogate-clinician communication and relationship (such as interacting with a single physician whom the surrogate recognizes as the clinical spokesperson vs. many clinicians).
These data provide insights into the challenges that surrogates encounter when making decisions for loved ones and indicate areas where clinicians could intervene to facilitate the process of surrogate decision-making. Clinicians may want to include surrogates in advance care planning prior to decision-making, identify and address surrogate stressors during decision-making, and designate one person to communicate information about the patient's condition, prognosis, and treatment options.
大多数临终医疗决策是由替代决策者做出的,他们对自己的角色准备程度和适应程度各不相同。有一位重病家庭成员对替代决策者来说压力很大。此外,大多数临床医生在与替代决策者有效合作方面接受的培训很少。
从替代决策者的角度更好地理解决策面临的挑战。
关于替代决策经历的半结构化电话访谈研究。
50名有过决策经验的指定替代决策者。
我们要求替代决策者描述并反思他们为他人做出医疗决策的经历。在对访谈记录进行编码后,我们进行了内容分析,以识别和分类那些使替代决策者决策难易程度不同的因素。
替代决策者识别出四种类型的因素:(1)替代决策者的特征和生活状况(如应对策略和相互冲突的责任),(2)替代决策者的社会网络(如家庭内部关于“正确”决策的分歧),(3)替代决策者与患者的关系及沟通(如难以尊重已知的偏好),以及(4)替代决策者与临床医生的沟通及关系(如与替代决策者认可为临床代言人的单一医生互动与与多名临床医生互动)。
这些数据为了解替代决策者在为亲人做决策时遇到的挑战提供了见解,并指出了临床医生可以进行干预以促进替代决策过程的领域。临床医生可能希望在决策前将替代决策者纳入预先护理计划,在决策过程中识别并解决替代决策者面临的压力源,并指定一人传达有关患者病情、预后和治疗选择的信息。