• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估替代标志物的统计方法。

Statistical Methods to Evaluate Surrogate Markers.

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Data Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2024 Feb 1;62(2):102-108. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001956. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001956
PMID:38079232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10842261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is tremendous interest in evaluating surrogate markers given their potential to decrease study time, costs, and patient burden.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this statistical workshop article is to describe and illustrate how to evaluate a surrogate marker of interest using the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained as a measure of the quality of the surrogate marker for: (1) a setting with a general fully observed primary outcome (eg, biopsy score); and (2) a setting with a time-to-event primary outcome which may be censored due to study termination or early drop out (eg, time to diabetes).

METHODS

The methods are motivated by 2 randomized trials, one among children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease where the primary outcome was a change in biopsy score (general outcome) and another study among adults at high risk for Type 2 diabetes where the primary outcome was time to diabetes (time-to-event outcome). The methods are illustrated using the Rsurrogate package with a detailed R code provided.

RESULTS

In the biopsy score outcome setting, the estimated PTE of the examined surrogate marker was 0.182 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.121, 0.240), that is, the surrogate explained only 18.2% of the treatment effect on the biopsy score. In the diabetes setting, the estimated PTE of the surrogate marker was 0.596 (95% CI: 0.404, 0.760), that is, the surrogate explained 59.6% of the treatment effect on diabetes incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This statistical workshop provides tools that will support future researchers in the evaluation of surrogate markers.

摘要

背景

由于替代标志物具有降低研究时间、成本和患者负担的潜力,因此人们对其评价非常感兴趣。

目的

本统计研讨会文章的目的是描述和说明如何使用治疗效果比例(PTE)来评估感兴趣的替代标志物,作为替代标志物质量的衡量标准:(1)具有一般完全观察主要结局(例如,活检评分)的设置;(2)具有因研究终止或早期退出而可能被删失的时间事件主要结局(例如,糖尿病时间)的设置。

方法

该方法源于两项随机试验,一项是针对非酒精性脂肪性肝病儿童的研究,主要结局是活检评分的变化(一般结局),另一项是针对 2 型糖尿病高危成人的研究,主要结局是糖尿病的时间(时间到事件结局)。该方法使用 Rsurrogate 包进行说明,并提供了详细的 R 代码。

结果

在活检评分结局设置中,所检查替代标志物的估计 PTE 为 0.182(95%置信区间[CI]:0.121,0.240),即替代标志物仅解释了活检评分治疗效果的 18.2%。在糖尿病设置中,替代标志物的估计 PTE 为 0.596(95%置信区间[CI]:0.404,0.760),即替代标志物解释了糖尿病发生率治疗效果的 59.6%。

结论

本统计研讨会提供了工具,将支持未来研究人员对替代标志物的评价。

相似文献

1
Statistical Methods to Evaluate Surrogate Markers.评估替代标志物的统计方法。
Med Care. 2024 Feb 1;62(2):102-108. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001956. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery.预防性使用非甾体抗炎药预防白内障手术后黄斑水肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD006683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006683.pub3.
4
Antioxidants for male subfertility.用于男性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(12):CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
7
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
8
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
9
Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者控制血糖的牙周疾病治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD004714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004714.pub3.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Surrogate Marker Evaluation: A Tutorial Using R.替代标志物评估:使用R语言的教程
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70048. doi: 10.1002/sim.70048.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating Covariates into Measures of Surrogate Paradox Risk.将协变量纳入替代悖论风险度量中。
Stats (Basel). 2023 Mar;6(1):322-344. doi: 10.3390/stats6010020. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Using a surrogate with heterogeneous utility to test for a treatment effect.使用具有异质效用的替代指标来检验治疗效果。
Stat Med. 2023 Jan 15;42(1):68-88. doi: 10.1002/sim.9602. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
3
Testing for heterogeneity in the utility of a surrogate marker.检测替代标志物效用的异质性。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):799-810. doi: 10.1111/biom.13600. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
4
Incorporating baseline covariates to validate surrogate endpoints with a constant biomarker under control arm.在对照臂下,通过纳入基线协变量来验证具有恒定生物标志物的替代终点。
Stat Med. 2021 Dec 20;40(29):6605-6618. doi: 10.1002/sim.9201. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
FDA allows drugs without proven clinical benefit to languish for years on accelerated pathway.美国食品药品监督管理局允许未经证实具有临床益处的药物在加速审批途径上搁置数年。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 29;374:n1898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1898.
6
Model-free approach to quantifying the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.一种无模型方法,用于量化替代标志物所解释的治疗效果比例。
Biometrika. 2020 Mar;107(1):107-122. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asz065. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
7
NAFLD in children: new genes, new diagnostic modalities and new drugs.儿童非酒精性脂肪性肝病:新基因、新诊断方法和新药物。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;16(9):517-530. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0169-z. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
8
Association of brain volume loss and long-term disability outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with teriflunomide.特立氟胺治疗多发性硬化症患者的脑容量损失与长期残疾结局的相关性。
Mult Scler. 2020 Sep;26(10):1207-1216. doi: 10.1177/1352458519855722. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Herpes Simplex Virus Shedding Rate: Surrogate Outcome for Genital Herpes Recurrence Frequency and Lesion Rates, and Phase 2 Clinical Trials End Point for Evaluating Efficacy of Antivirals.单纯疱疹病毒脱落率:生殖器疱疹复发频率和病变率的替代结局,以及评估抗病毒药物疗效的 2 期临床试验终点。
J Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 20;218(11):1691-1699. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy372.
10
Evaluating surrogate marker information using censored data.使用删失数据评估替代标志物信息。
Stat Med. 2017 May 20;36(11):1767-1782. doi: 10.1002/sim.7220. Epub 2017 Jan 15.