Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 4618 Country Club Road, Winston-Salem, NC, 27104, USA.
Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Dec 12;316(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02758-4.
Drug efficacy is best evaluated by randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trials; however, safety is harder to assess. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) is used to track and categorize adverse events (AE) during clinical trials. Recent atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials were reviewed to illustrate how an understanding of MedDRA may be helpful when evaluating the rates and nature of adverse events related to herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. All completed AD clinical trials (excluding phase I studies) with results on clinicaltrials.gov (01/01/2018-01/31/2023) were queried in January 2023. MedDRA version, preferred term (PT) for AEs captured as "HSV", PTs for other AEs possibly related to HSV, frequency thresholds for reporting non-serious AEs, and route of treatment were recorded. Of the 46 clinical trials, 17 had PTs for AEs captured as "HSV". Among all studies, 11 different versions of MedDRA were utilized, from versions 10 to 24.1. In all studies, PTs for AEs captured as "HSV" were listed in the Infections and Infestations system organ class (SOC) classification of MedDRA. PTs varied from "herpes simplex", "herpes virus infection", "herpes ophthalmic", "ophthalmic herpes simplex", "nasal herpes", "oral herpes", "herpes dermatitis", "eczema herpeticum", "genital herpes simplex", and "genital herpes." While one clinical trial of dupilumab (NCT03359356) simply reported the PT "oral herpes" as an AE, a clinical trial of DS107 (NCT03817190) reported the PTs "oral herpes", "herpes simplex", and "herpes virus infection" separately. In the DS107 clinical trial, it is unclear if the same adverse event was reported under multiple PTs or if multiple HSV-related AEs occurred. Although the definition of HSV is unchanged from 2018 to 2023 and there are few changes between MedDRA versions, coding for HSV is complex. HSV events can be reported in different ways, which may impact the interpretation of a drug's safety profile.
药物疗效最好通过随机、对照、双盲临床试验进行评估;然而,安全性更难评估。《监管活动医学词典》(MedDRA)用于在临床试验中跟踪和分类不良事件(AE)。最近回顾了特应性皮炎(AD)临床试验,以说明当评估与单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)感染相关的不良事件的发生率和性质时,对 MedDRA 的理解可能会有所帮助。2023 年 1 月,查询了临床trials.gov 上所有已完成的 AD 临床试验(不包括 I 期研究)(2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日)的结果。记录了 MedDRA 版本、AE 的首选术语(PT)为“HSV”、可能与 HSV 相关的其他 AE 的 PT、报告非严重 AE 的频率阈值以及治疗途径。在 46 项临床试验中,有 17 项 PT 为“HSV”的 AE。在所有研究中,使用了从版本 10 到 24.1 的 11 种不同版本的 MedDRA。在所有研究中,AE 的 PT 为“HSV”被列入 MedDRA 的感染和寄生虫系统器官分类(SOC)分类。PT 从“单纯疱疹”、“疱疹病毒感染”、“疱疹性眼病”、“单纯疱疹性眼病”、“鼻疱疹”、“口腔疱疹”、“疱疹性皮炎”、“疱疹性湿疹”、“生殖器单纯疱疹”和“生殖器疱疹”不等。虽然一项度普利尤单抗的临床试验(NCT03359356)简单地报告了 PT“口腔疱疹”作为 AE,但一项 DS107 的临床试验(NCT03817190)分别报告了 PT“口腔疱疹”、“单纯疱疹”和“疱疹病毒感染”。在 DS107 临床试验中,不清楚是否报告了多个 PT 下的同一不良事件,或者是否发生了多个与 HSV 相关的 AE。尽管 2018 年至 2023 年 HSV 的定义保持不变,MedDRA 版本之间的变化也很少,但 HSV 的编码很复杂。HSV 事件可以以不同的方式报告,这可能会影响对药物安全性概况的解释。