Kwiecień S, Wojcik-Grzybek D, Sliwowski Z, Targosz A, Chmura A, Magierowska K, Strzalka M, Glowacka U, Ptak-Belowska A, Magierowski M, Brzozowski T
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Cracow, Poland.
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;74(5). doi: 10.26402/jpp.2023.5.08. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
The gut mucosal barrier plays a key role in the physiology of gastrointestinal (GI) tract, preventing under homeostatic conditions, the epithelial cells of the gastric mucosa from hydrochloric acid and intestinal mucosa from alkaline secretion, food toxins and pathogenic microbiota. Previous studies have documented that blockade of both isoforms of cyclooxygenase (COX): constitutive (COX-1) and inducible (COX-2), as well NO synthase in the stomach exacerbated the gastric damage induced by various ulcerogens, however, such as effects of non-selective and selective inhibition of COX-1, COX-2 and NOS enzymes on colonic damage have been little studied. The supplementation of NO by intragastric (i.g.) treatment with NO-releasing compound NO-aspirin (NO-ASA) or substrate for NO synthase L-arginine ameliorated the damage of upper GI-tract, but whether similar effect can be observed in colonic mucosa associated with the experimental colitis, and if above mentioned compounds can be effective in aggravation or protection of experimental colitis remains less recognized. In this study rats with experimental colitis induced by intrarectal administration of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzosulphonic acid (TNBS) were daily treated for 7 days with: 1) vehicle (i.g.), 2) ASA 40 mg/kg (i.g.), 3) rofecoxib 10 mg/kg (i.g.), 4) resveratrol 10 mg/kg (i.g.), 5) NO-ASA 40 mg/kg (i.g.), 6) L-arginine 200 mg/kg (i.g.) with or without of L-NNA 20 mg/kg (i.p.). The macroscopic and microscopic area of colonic damage was determined planimetrically, the colonic blood flow (CBF) was assessed by Laser flowmetry, and the oxidative stress biomarkers malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal (MDA+4-HNE), the antioxidative factors superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione (GSH), as well as proinflammatory cytokines in the colonic mucosa (tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-1beta (IL-1β)) were measured. We have documented that administration of TNBS produced gross and microscopic colonic damage and significantly decreased CBF (p<0.05). Treatment with ASA significantly increased the area of colonic damage (p<0.05), an effect accompanied by a significant decrease in the CBF, the significant increment of MDA+4-HNE, and the attenuation of the antioxidative properties in colonic mucosa, documented by a significant decrease of SOD activity and GSH concentration, and elevation of the colonic tissue levels of TNF-α and IL-1β comparing to control Veh-treated TNBS rats. Administration of rofecoxib or resveratrol also significantly increased the colonic damage and significantly decreased the CBF, causing an increase in MDA+4-HNE and mucosal content of TNF-α and IL-1α and a significant decrease of the SOD activity and GSH content (p<0.05), however, these changes were significantly less pronounced as compared with ASA. On the contrary, the treatment with NO-ASA, or L-arginine, significantly diminished the area of colonic lesions, the MDA+4-HNE concentration, attenuated the TNF-α and IL-1β levels, while increasing the CBF, SOD activity and GSH content (p<0.05). The concomitant treatment of L-NNA with rofecoxib or resveratrol reversed an increase in area of colonic damage and accompanying changes in CBF, colonic mucosa TNF-α and IL-1β levels, the MDA+4-HNE concentration, and SOD activity and GSH content comparing to those observed in TNBS rats treated with these COX-inhibitors alone (p<0.05). In contrast, co-treatment with L-NNA and NO-ASA or L-arginine failed to significantly affect the decrease of colonic lesions accompanied by the rise in CBF, the attenuation of MDA+4-HNE concentration, TNF-α and IL-1β levels, SOD activity and GSH content exerted by NO-ASA- or L-arginine treatment of the respective control TNBS-rats without L-NNA administration. These observations suggest that 1) the increase of NO availability either from NO-releasing donors such as NO-ASA or NO precursors such as L-arginine, can inhibit the inflammatory and microvasculature alterations, as well as increase in lipid peroxidation due to the enhanced efficacy of these compounds to increase the antioxidative properties of colonic mucosa, 2) unlike ASA which exacerbated the severity of colitis, the treatment with rofecoxib, the specific 'safer' COX-2 inhibitor or resveratrol, the polyphenolic compound known to act as the dual COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor, can attenuate the colonic damage during course of TNBS colitis possibly via anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties, and 3) the blockade of endogenous NO activity by L-NNA which also exacerbated the severity of mucosal damage in colitis, can abolish the sparing effect of rofecoxib and resveratrol indicating the NO bioavailability plays an important role in enhanced efficacy of both specific and dual COX inhibitors to ameliorate the experimental colitis.
肠道黏膜屏障在胃肠道生理功能中起关键作用,在稳态条件下可防止胃黏膜上皮细胞免受盐酸侵蚀,以及肠黏膜免受碱性分泌物、食物毒素和致病微生物群的侵害。先前的研究表明,同时阻断环氧化酶(COX)的两种同工型:组成型(COX-1)和诱导型(COX-2),以及胃中的一氧化氮合酶,会加剧各种致溃疡因素引起的胃损伤,然而,非选择性和选择性抑制COX-1、COX-2和NOS酶对结肠损伤的影响研究较少。通过胃内(i.g.)给予释放一氧化氮的化合物NO-阿司匹林(NO-ASA)或一氧化氮合酶底物L-精氨酸补充一氧化氮,可改善上消化道损伤,但在与实验性结肠炎相关的结肠黏膜中是否能观察到类似效果,以及上述化合物在加重或保护实验性结肠炎方面是否有效,仍鲜为人知。在本研究中,通过直肠内注射2,4,6-三硝基苯磺酸(TNBS)诱导实验性结肠炎的大鼠,每天接受以下治疗7天:1)赋形剂(i.g.),2)阿司匹林40mg/kg(i.g.),3)罗非昔布10mg/kg(i.g.),4)白藜芦醇10mg/kg(i.g.),5)NO-ASA 40mg/kg(i.g.),6)L-精氨酸200mg/kg(i.g.),同时或不伴有L-NNA 20mg/kg(腹腔注射)。通过平面测量法测定结肠损伤的宏观和微观面积,通过激光血流仪评估结肠血流量(CBF),并测量结肠黏膜中的氧化应激生物标志物丙二醛和4-羟基壬烯醛(MDA+4-HNE)、抗氧化因子超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和谷胱甘肽(GSH),以及促炎细胞因子(肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β))。我们已证明,给予TNBS会导致结肠出现肉眼可见和微观的损伤,并显著降低CBF(p<0.05)。用阿司匹林治疗显著增加了结肠损伤面积(p<0.05),这一效应伴随着CBF的显著降低、MDA+4-HNE的显著增加以及结肠黏膜抗氧化特性的减弱,表现为SOD活性和GSH浓度的显著降低,以及与对照赋形剂处理的TNBS大鼠相比,结肠组织中TNF-α和IL-1β水平的升高。给予罗非昔布或白藜芦醇也显著增加了结肠损伤并显著降低了CBF,导致MDA+4-HNE以及TNF-α和IL-1α的黏膜含量增加,SOD活性和GSH含量显著降低(p<0.05),然而,与阿司匹林相比,这些变化明显不那么显著。相反,用NO-ASA或L-精氨酸治疗显著减少了结肠病变面积、MDA+4-HNE浓度,降低了TNF-α和IL-1β水平,同时增加了CBF、SOD活性和GSH含量(p<0.05)。L-NNA与罗非昔布或白藜芦醇联合治疗可逆转结肠损伤面积的增加以及伴随的CBF、结肠黏膜TNF-α和IL-1β水平、MDA+4-HNE浓度以及SOD活性和GSH含量的变化,与单独用这些COX抑制剂治疗的TNBS大鼠相比(p<0.05)。相比之下,L-NNA与NO-ASA或L-精氨酸联合治疗未能显著影响NO-ASA或L-精氨酸治疗相应未给予L-NNA的对照TNBS大鼠所导致的结肠病变减少、CBF增加、MDA+4-HNE浓度降低、TNF-α和IL-1β水平降低、SOD活性和GSH含量增加的效果。这些观察结果表明:1)从释放一氧化氮的供体如NO-ASA或一氧化氮前体如L-精氨酸增加一氧化氮的可用性,可抑制炎症和微血管改变,以及由于这些化合物增强结肠黏膜抗氧化特性的功效而导致的脂质过氧化增加;2)与加剧结肠炎严重程度的阿司匹林不同,用罗非昔布(特定的“更安全”的COX-2抑制剂)或白藜芦醇(已知作为COX-1和COX-2双重抑制剂的多酚化合物)治疗,可能通过抗炎和抗氧化特性减轻TNBS结肠炎病程中的结肠损伤;3)L-NNA对内源性一氧化氮活性的阻断也加剧了结肠炎中黏膜损伤的严重程度,可消除罗非昔布和白藜芦醇的保护作用,表明一氧化氮的生物利用度在增强特异性和双重COX抑制剂改善实验性结肠炎的功效中起重要作用。