Radboudumc, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboudumc, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.042. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
Learning minimally invasive suturing can be challenging, creating a barrier to further implementation, especially with the development of easier methods. Nevertheless, mastering intracorporeal knot tying is crucial when alternative techniques prove inadequate. Therefore, the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) suturing skills of MIS experts are compared with a group of novices during their learning curve on a simulator.
The novice participants repeatedly performed the intracorporeal suturing task on the EoSim MIS simulator (up to a maximum of 20 repetitions). The experts (>50 MIS procedures and advanced MIS experience) completed the same task once. The first and last exercises of the novices and the expert tasks were all blindly recorded and assessed by two independent assessors using the Laparoscopic Suturing Competency Assessment Tool (LS-CAT). Additionally, objective assessment parameters, "time" and "distance", using instrument tracking, were collected. The scores of the experts were then compared with the novices.
At the end of the training, novices significantly outperformed the experts on both the expert assessment (LS-CAT: 16.8 versus 26.8, P = 0.001) and objective parameters (median time: 190 s versus 161 s, P < 0.001; median distance: 6.1 m versus 3.6 m, P < 0.001). Although the experts showed slightly better performance than the novices during their first task, the difference was not significant on the expert assessment (LS-CAT experts 16.8, novices 20.5, P = 0.057).
Our findings underscore the significance of continued MIS suturing training for both residents and surgeons. In this study, trained novices demonstrated a significant outperformance of experts on both quantitative and qualitative outcome parameters within a simulated setting.
学习微创缝合可能具有挑战性,尤其是在更容易的方法出现之后,这成为了进一步实施的障碍。然而,当替代技术证明不足时,掌握腔内打结至关重要。因此,在模拟器上比较了微创外科 (MIS) 专家和一组新手在学习曲线上的 MIS 缝合技能。
新手参与者在 EoSim MIS 模拟器上反复进行腔内缝合任务(最多重复 20 次)。专家(>50 次 MIS 手术和高级 MIS 经验)仅完成一次相同的任务。新手的前 1 次和最后 1 次练习以及专家任务都是由两名独立评估者盲目记录和使用腹腔镜缝合能力评估工具 (LS-CAT) 进行评估。此外,还使用仪器跟踪收集了“时间”和“距离”等客观评估参数。然后将专家的分数与新手进行比较。
在培训结束时,新手在专家评估(LS-CAT:16.8 与 26.8,P=0.001)和客观参数(中位数时间:190 s 与 161 s,P<0.001;中位数距离:6.1 m 与 3.6 m,P<0.001)上都明显优于专家。尽管专家在第一次任务中的表现略好于新手,但在专家评估上差异不显著(LS-CAT 专家 16.8,新手 20.5,P=0.057)。
我们的发现强调了继续进行微创缝合培训对于住院医师和外科医生的重要性。在这项研究中,经过培训的新手在模拟环境中无论是在定量还是定性结果参数上都明显优于专家。