Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与腹腔镜缝合在模拟环境中的学习曲线。

Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre - Amalia Children's Hospital, Geert Grooteplein 10 Route 618, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3679-3689. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared to conventional laparoscopy, robot assisted surgery is expected to have most potential in difficult areas and demanding technical skills like minimally invasive suturing. This study was performed to identify the differences in the learning curves of laparoscopic versus robot assisted suturing.

METHOD

Novice participants performed three suturing tasks on the EoSim laparoscopic augmented reality simulator or the RobotiX robot assisted virtual reality simulator. Each participant performed an intracorporeal suturing task, a tilted plane needle transfer task and an anastomosis needle transfer task. To complete the learning curve, all tasks were repeated up to twenty repetitions or until a time plateau was reached. Clinically relevant and comparable parameters regarding time, movements and safety were recorded. Intracorporeal suturing time and cumulative sum analysis was used to compare the learning curves and phases.

RESULTS

Seventeen participants completed the learning curve laparoscopically and 30 robot assisted. Median first knot suturing time was 611 s (s) for laparoscopic versus 251 s for robot assisted (p < 0.001), and this was 324 s versus 165 (sixth knot, p < 0.001) and 257 s and 149 s (eleventh knot, p < 0.001) respectively on base of the found learning phases. The percentage of 'adequate surgical knots' was higher in the laparoscopic than in the robot assisted group. First knot: 71% versus 60%, sixth knot: 100% versus 83%, and eleventh knot: 100% versus 73%. When assessing the 'instrument out of view' parameter, the robot assisted group scored a median of 0% after repetition four. In the laparoscopic group, the instrument out of view increased from 3.1 to 3.9% (left) and from 3.0 to 4.1% (right) between the first and eleventh knot (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The learning curve of minimally invasive suturing shows a shorter task time curve using robotic assistance compared to the laparoscopic curve. However, laparoscopic outcomes show good end results with rapid outcome improvement.

摘要

背景

与传统腹腔镜相比,机器人辅助手术有望在微创手术缝合等困难领域和高难度技术技能方面具有最大的潜力。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜与机器人辅助缝合的学习曲线差异。

方法

新手参与者在 EoSim 腹腔镜增强现实模拟器或 RobotiX 机器人辅助虚拟现实模拟器上完成三项缝合任务。每位参与者完成一项体腔内缝合任务、一个倾斜平面针转移任务和一个吻合针转移任务。为了完成学习曲线,所有任务重复进行,最多重复二十次或直到达到时间平台。记录与时间、动作和安全性相关的临床相关且可比的参数。使用体腔内缝合时间和累积和分析来比较学习曲线和阶段。

结果

17 名参与者完成了腹腔镜学习曲线,30 名参与者完成了机器人辅助学习曲线。腹腔镜第一结缝合时间中位数为 611 秒(s),机器人辅助为 251 秒(p<0.001),这是基于发现的学习阶段,第六结为 324 秒和 165 秒(p<0.001),第十一节结为 257 秒和 149 秒(p<0.001)。腹腔镜组的“适当手术结”百分比高于机器人辅助组。第一结:71%比 60%,第六结:100%比 83%,第十一节结:100%比 73%。评估“器械视线外”参数时,机器人辅助组在重复四次后得分为中位数 0%。在腹腔镜组中,器械视线从第一结到第十一结从左 3.1%增加到 3.9%,从右 3.0%增加到 4.1%(p>0.05)。

结论

微创缝合的学习曲线显示,与腹腔镜曲线相比,机器人辅助具有更短的任务时间曲线。然而,腹腔镜结果显示出良好的最终结果,并且结果迅速改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb4/7326898/10ad6d9ec426/464_2019_7263_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验