• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并非如此简单——医学诊断背后的推理。

Not so elementary - the reasoning behind a medical diagnosis.

作者信息

Sooknanan Joanna, Seemungal Terence

机构信息

Independent Researcher.

The University of The West Indies.

出版信息

MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Dec 17;8:234. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000234.1. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.15694/mep.2019.000234.1
PMID:38089286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10712618/
Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Making a diagnosis is a complex process involving incomplete yet dynamic information. At no other time in the history of medicine has information been so readily available and accessible resulting in a greater need for clarity of thinking. A clear understanding of the underlying reasoning processes involved is necessary so as to avoid misdiagnosis and to avoid unnecessary often costly and time-consuming tests. This article explores the main reasoning processes inherent in the making of a diagnosis - deduction, induction and abduction.

摘要

本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐。做出诊断是一个复杂的过程,涉及不完整但动态的信息。在医学史上,从未有过如此容易获取信息的时期,这导致了对清晰思维的更大需求。有必要清楚地理解所涉及的潜在推理过程,以避免误诊并避免进行不必要的、通常既昂贵又耗时的检查。本文探讨了诊断过程中固有的主要推理过程——演绎、归纳和溯因推理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e0/10712618/0aa2266b689f/mep-8-19894-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e0/10712618/3adc131ea691/mep-8-19894-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e0/10712618/b5fa7a38e7ea/mep-8-19894-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e0/10712618/0aa2266b689f/mep-8-19894-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e0/10712618/3adc131ea691/mep-8-19894-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e0/10712618/b5fa7a38e7ea/mep-8-19894-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e0/10712618/0aa2266b689f/mep-8-19894-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Not so elementary - the reasoning behind a medical diagnosis.并非如此简单——医学诊断背后的推理。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Dec 17;8:234. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000234.1. eCollection 2019.
2
Abductive reasoning in nursing: Challenges and possibilities.护理中的溯因推理:挑战与可能性。
Nurs Inq. 2021 Jan;28(1):e12374. doi: 10.1111/nin.12374. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Enhancing clinical judgement in virtual care for complex chronic disease.提升虚拟医疗中复杂慢性病临床决策能力。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;27(3):677-683. doi: 10.1111/jep.13544. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
4
A concept analysis of abductive reasoning.溯因推理的概念分析
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Sep;70(9):1980-1994. doi: 10.1111/jan.12379. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
5
Fear of knowledge: Clinical hypotheses in diagnostic and prognostic reasoning.对知识的恐惧:诊断与预后推理中的临床假设
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):928-934. doi: 10.1111/jep.12664. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
6
Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology.临床推理中的推理过程:从认知心理学的视角
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Dec;31(4):299-308. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.140. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
7
Varieties of clinical reasoning.临床推理的种类
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):486-9. doi: 10.1111/jep.12309. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning.认识我们的错误:临床推理中的错误入门
Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):177-81. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000092580.
9
Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.模拟论据长度和有效性对归纳推理和演绎推理的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1317-30. doi: 10.1037/a0016648.
10
Executive Functions and Improvement of Thinking: An Intervention Program to Enhance Deductive Reasoning Abilities.执行功能与思维提升:一项增强演绎推理能力的干预计划。
Span J Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;25:e32. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2022.26.

本文引用的文献

1
The thinking doctor: clinical decision making in contemporary medicine.《思考型医生:当代医学中的临床决策》
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Aug;16(4):343-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-4-343.
2
A concept analysis of abductive reasoning.溯因推理的概念分析
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Sep;70(9):1980-1994. doi: 10.1111/jan.12379. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
3
Philosophy of science and the diagnostic process.科学哲学与诊断过程。
Fam Pract. 2013 Oct;30(5):501-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt031. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
Clinical reasoning: concept analysis.临床推理:概念分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 May;66(5):1151-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05262.x. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
5
Inferences of clinical diagnostic reasoning and diagnostic error.临床诊断推理和诊断错误的推论。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Jun;44(3):402-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
6
Iterative diagnosis.迭代诊断
BMJ. 2009 Sep 22;339:b3490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3490.
7
Teaching clinical thinking to first-year medical students.向一年级医学生传授临床思维
Med Teach. 2009 Feb;31(2):105-11. doi: 10.1080/01421590802512979.
8
Scientific method, abduction, and clinical reasoning.科学方法、溯因推理与临床推理。
J Clin Psychol. 2008 Sep;64(9):1013-8. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20505.
9
White coats and fingerprints: diagnostic reasoning in medicine and investigative methods of fictional detectives.白大褂与指纹:医学中的诊断推理及虚构侦探的调查方法
BMJ. 2005 Dec 24;331(7531):1491-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1491.
10
Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making: a methodological guide.识别医学决策中的推理策略:方法指南。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Apr;38(2):154-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.001.